Literature DB >> 31059732

Considerations for refining the risk assessment process for formaldehyde: Results from an interdisciplinary workshop.

Melvin E Andersen1, P Robinan Gentry2, James A Swenberg3, Kenneth A Mundt4, Kimberly W White5, Chad Thompson6, James Bus7, James H Sherman8, Helmut Greim9, Hermann Bolt10, Gary M Marsh11, Harvey Checkoway12, David Coggon13, Harvey J Clewell14.   

Abstract

Anticipating the need to evaluate and integrate scientific evidence to inform new risk assessments or to update existing risk assessments, the Formaldehyde Panel of the American Chemistry Council (ACC), in collaboration with the University of North Carolina, convened a workshop: "Understanding Potential Human Health Cancer Risk - From Data Integration to Risk Evaluation" in October 2017. Twenty-four (24) invited-experts participated with expertise in epidemiology, toxicology, science integration and risk evaluation. Including members of the organizing committee, there were 29 participants. The meeting included eleven presentations encompassing an introduction and three sessions: (1) "integrating the formaldehyde science on nasal/nasopharyngeal carcinogenicity and potential for causality"; (2) "integrating the formaldehyde science on lymphohematopoietic cancer and potential for causality; and, (3) "formaldehyde research-data suitable for risk assessment". Here we describe key points from the presentations on epidemiology, toxicology and mechanistic studies that should inform decisions about the potential carcinogenicity of formaldehyde in humans and the discussions about approaches for structuring an integrated, comprehensive risk assessment for formaldehyde. We also note challenges expected when attempting to reconcile divergent results observed from research conducted within and across different scientific disciplines - especially toxicology and epidemiology - and in integrating diverse, multi-disciplinary mechanistic evidence.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence integration; Formaldehyde; Inconsistent human epidemiology; Integrating data streams; Mode-of-action in animal studies; Reconciling conflicting conclusions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31059732     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  3 in total

Review 1.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 2.  Formaldehyde exposure and leukemia risk: a comprehensive review and network-based toxicogenomic approach.

Authors:  Doo Seok Kang; Hyun Soo Kim; Jong-Hyeon Jung; Cheol Min Lee; Yeon-Soon Ahn; Young Rok Seo
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2021-04-12

3.  Nanocellulose Removes the Need for Chemical Crosslinking in Tannin-Based Rigid Foams and Enhances Their Strength and Fire Retardancy.

Authors:  André Luiz Missio; Caio G Otoni; Bin Zhao; Marco Beaumont; Alexey Khakalo; Tero Kämäräinen; Silvia H F Silva; Bruno D Mattos; Orlando J Rojas
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 9.224

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.