Literature DB >> 31059665

Impact of Cribriform Pattern and Intraductal Carcinoma on Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy.

Martin C Tom1, Jane K Nguyen2, Roberta Lucianò3, Omar Y Mian1, Kevin L Stephans1, Jay P Ciezki1, Timothy D Smile1, Wei Wei4, Jesse K McKenney2, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi5, Rahul D Tendulkar1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the impact of cribriform pattern and/or intraductal carcinoma on Gleason 7 prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy.
METHODS: We evaluated men with Gleason 7 (Grade Groups 2 and 3) prostate cancer treated with dose escalated external beam radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation. We reviewed biopsies for the presence of cribriform pattern and/or intraductal carcinoma. Study end points included biochemical recurrence-free, distant metastasis-free and disease specific survival.
RESULTS: In the 237 patients median followup was 117 months (range 3 to 236). According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network® risk groups 24% of patients were at favorable intermediate risk, 53% were at unfavorable intermediate risk and 23% were at high risk. The rate of cribriform pattern without intraductal carcinoma, cribriform pattern with intraductal carcinoma, intraductal carcinoma without cribriform pattern and none of these morphologies was 36%, 13%, 0% and 51%, respectively. On multivariable analysis cribriform pattern with intraductal carcinoma (HR 4.22, 95% CI 2.08-8.53, p <0.0001), prostate specific antigen 10 to 20 ng/ml (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.03-3.79, p=0.04) and prostate specific antigen greater than 20 ng/ml (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.21-4.23, p=0.01) were associated with worse biochemical recurrence-free survival. On multivariable analysis only cribriform pattern with intraductal carcinoma was associated with inferior distant metastasis-free survival (HR 4.18, 95% CI 1.43-12.28, p=0.01) and disease specific survival (HR 14.26, 95% CI 2.75-74.04, p=0.0016). Factors associated with cribriform pattern with or without intraductal carcinoma included Grade Group 3, high risk group and 50% or more positive biopsy cores. When stratified by neither morphology present, cribriform pattern without intraductal carcinoma and cribriform pattern with intraductal carcinoma the differences in biochemical recurrence-free, distant metastasis-free and disease specific survival were statistically significant (p=0.00042, p=0.017 and p <0.0001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Cribriform pattern with intraductal carcinoma was associated with adverse outcomes in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy while cribriform pattern without intraductal carcinoma was not so associated. Future studies may benefit from dichotomizing these 2 histological entities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenocarcinoma; carcinoma; histology; intraductal; noninfiltrating; prostatic neoplasms; survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31059665     DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cribriform Prostate Cancer: Clinical Pathologic and Molecular Considerations.

Authors:  Amanda B Hesterberg; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Paula J Hurley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.633

2.  Clinical significance of IDC-P as predictive factor after intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rihito Aizawa; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Hironori Haga; Kiyonao Nakamura; Takashi Ogata; Takahiro Inoue; Takashi Kobayashi; Shusuke Akamatsu; Takayuki Goto; Osamu Ogawa; Takashi Mizowaki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.518

3.  Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading.

Authors:  Geert J L H van Leenders; Esther I Verhoef; Eva Hollemans
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 4.  Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate as a Cause of Prostate Cancer Metastasis: A Molecular Portrait.

Authors:  Helen Pantazopoulos; Mame-Kany Diop; Andrée-Anne Grosset; Frédérique Rouleau-Gagné; Afnan Al-Saleh; Teodora Boblea; Dominique Trudel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer.

Authors:  James G Kench; Mahul B Amin; Daniel M Berney; Eva M Compérat; Ian A Cree; Anthony J Gill; Arndt Hartmann; Santosh Menon; Holger Moch; George J Netto; Maria R Raspollini; Mark A Rubin; Puay Hoon Tan; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Samra Turjalic; Theo H van der Kwast; Ming Zhou; John R Srigley
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 7.778

6.  Assessment of MYC/PTEN Status by Gene-Protein Assay in Grade Group 2 Prostate Biopsies.

Authors:  Daniela C Salles; Thiago Vidotto; Farzana A Faisal; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Liana B Guedes; Andrea Muranyi; Isaac Bai; Shalini Singh; Dongyao Yan; Kandavel Shanmugam; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 5.568

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.