Literature DB >> 31059250

Massively Parallel Implementation of Steered Molecular Dynamics in Tinker-HP: Comparisons of Polarizable and Non-Polarizable Simulations of Realistic Systems.

Frédéric Célerse1,2, Louis Lagardère3,4,5, Etienne Derat2, Jean-Philip Piquemal1,6,7.   

Abstract

Steered molecular dynamic (SMD) is a powerful technique able to accelerate rare event sampling in Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations by applying an external force to a set of chosen atoms. Despite generating nonequilibrium simulations, SMD remains capable of reconstructing equilibrium properties such as the Potential of Mean Force (PMF). Of course, one would like to use all types of force fields (FF) ranging from classical ones to more advanced polarizable models using point induced dipoles and distributed multipoles such as AMOEBA. To enable such studies, the SMD methodology has been implemented in the framework of the massively parallel Tinker-HP software allowing for both long polarizable and non-polarizable MD simulations of large proteins. To validate this new implementation, we first compared the Tinker-HP SMD results to the literature. Tests have been performed on three different benchmark systems: the M-A deca-alanine (112 atoms), the ubiquitin (9737 atoms), and the CD2CD58 complex (97594 atoms). Non-polarizable (AMBER99, AMBER99SB, CHARMM22/CMAP, and OPLS-AA/L) and polarizable (AMOEBAPRO13 and AMOEBABIO18) force fields have been used. For each one of them, PMFs have been reconstructed and compared in terms of free energy barrier and hydrogen bonding fluctuations behavior over time. Using a SMD velocity of 0.01 Å/ps applied to a set of 20 trajectories, we show that polarizable and non-polarizable force fields do not always agree. As it could be anticipated, strong discrepancies are noticed between polarizable and non-polarizable models when considered in vacuum, whereas results are more comparable when a water environment is added. However, for the largest system, i.e., the CD2CD58 complex, strong differences related to the modeling of a salt bridge are noticed exhibiting some potential issues with classical FFs. Overall, such simulations highlight the importance of the inclusion of polarization effects as PMF free energy barriers computed with AMOEBA always decrease compared to non-polarizable force fields.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31059250     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  6 in total

1.  Integration of Experimental Data and Use of Automated Fitting Methods in Developing Protein Force Fields.

Authors:  Marcelo D Polêto; Justin A Lemkul
Journal:  Commun Chem       Date:  2022-03-18

2.  Reconciling NMR Structures of the HIV-1 Nucleocapsid Protein NCp7 Using Extensive Polarizable Force Field Free-Energy Simulations.

Authors:  Léa El Khoury; Frédéric Célerse; Louis Lagardère; Luc-Henri Jolly; Etienne Derat; Zeina Hobaika; Richard G Maroun; Pengyu Ren; Serge Bouaziz; Nohad Gresh; Jean-Philip Piquemal
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Tinker-HP: Accelerating Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Large Complex Systems with Advanced Point Dipole Polarizable Force Fields Using GPUs and Multi-GPU Systems.

Authors:  Olivier Adjoua; Louis Lagardère; Luc-Henri Jolly; Arnaud Durocher; Thibaut Very; Isabelle Dupays; Zhi Wang; Théo Jaffrelot Inizan; Frédéric Célerse; Pengyu Ren; Jay W Ponder; Jean-Philip Piquemal
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Benchmarking Adaptive Steered Molecular Dynamics (ASMD) on CHARMM Force Fields.

Authors:  Caley Allen; Hailey R Bureau; T Dwight McGee; Stephen Quirk; Rigoberto Hernandez
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.520

5.  High-resolution mining of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease conformational space: supercomputer-driven unsupervised adaptive sampling.

Authors:  Théo Jaffrelot Inizan; Frédéric Célerse; Olivier Adjoua; Dina El Ahdab; Luc-Henri Jolly; Chengwen Liu; Pengyu Ren; Matthieu Montes; Nathalie Lagarde; Louis Lagardère; Pierre Monmarché; Jean-Philip Piquemal
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  Accurate Biomolecular Simulations Account for Electronic Polarization.

Authors:  Josef Melcr; Jean-Philip Piquemal
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2019-12-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.