Signature microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs in laryngeal cancer recurrence identified using a competing endogenous RNA network.

The aim of the present study was to identify novel microRNA (miRNA) or long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) signatures of laryngeal cancer recurrence and to investigate the regulatory mechanisms associated with this malignancy. Datasets of recurrent and nonrecurrent laryngeal cancer samples were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE27020 and GSE25727) to examine differentially expressed miRNAs (DE‑miRs), lncRNAs (DE‑lncRs) and mRNAs (DEGs). miRNA‑mRNA and lncRNA‑miRNA networks were constructed by investigating the associations among these RNAs in various databases. Subsequently, the interactions identified were combined into a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) regulatory network. Feature genes in the miRNA‑mRNA network were identified via topological analysis and a recursive feature elimination algorithm. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier was established using the betweenness centrality values in the miRNA‑mRNA network, consisting of 32 optimal feature‑coding genes. The classification effect was tested using two validation datasets. Furthermore, coding genes in the ceRNA network were examined via pathway enrichment analyses. In total, 21 DE‑lncRs, 507 DEGs and 55 DE‑miRs were selected. The SVM classifier exhibited an accuracy of 94.05% (79/84) for sample classification prediction in the TCGA dataset, and 92.66 and 91.07% in the two validation datasets. The ceRNA regulatory network comprised 203 nodes, corresponding to mRNAs, miRNAs and lncRNAs, and 346 lines, corresponding to the interactions among RNAs. In particular, the interactions with the highest scores were HLA complex group 4 (HCG4)‑miR‑33b, HOX transcript antisense RNA (HOTAIR)‑miR‑1‑MAGE family member A2 (MAGEA2), EMX2 opposite strand/antisense RNA (EMX2OS)‑miR‑124‑calcitonin related polypeptide α (CALCA) and EMX2OS‑miR‑124‑γ‑aminobutyric acid type A receptor γ2 subunit (GABRG2). Gene enrichment analysis of the genes in the ceRNA network identified that 11 pathway terms and 16 molecular function terms were significantly enriched. The SVM classifier based on 32 feature coding genes exhibited high accuracy in the classification of laryngeal cancer samples. miR‑1, miR‑33b, miR‑124, HOTAIR, HCG4 and EMX2OS may be novel biomarkers of recurrent laryngeal cancer, and HCG4‑miR‑33b, HOTAIR‑miR‑1‑MAGEA2 and EMX2OS‑miR‑124‑CALCA/GABRG2 may be associated with the molecular mechanisms regulating recurrent laryngeal cancer.

Introduction

Laryngeal cancer is the commonest cancer in the larynx. Squamous cell carcinoma is the predominant physiological type of laryngeal cancer, as it originates from the glottic region of the larynx. At present, to the best of the authors' knowledge, effective treatment for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) primarily relies on radiotherapy and surgery. Tobacco and alcohol consumption are the principal risk factors for the development of laryngeal cancer (1). The annual incidence of laryngeal cancer is ~5 per 100,000 individuals and the 5-year survival rate is 60.6% in the USA (2,3). It was estimates that 23,400 new cases of laryngeal cancer occurred in China in 2014 (4).

Patients with upper-airway malignancies exhibit an increased risk of developing locoregional cancer recurrence and second primary malignancies, and the larynx and nasopharynx are among the most frequent sites of locoregional cancer recurrence (5,6). Although the available therapeutic strategies exhibit promising results, the clinical outcomes of patients with LSCC remain poor (4). Understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease may contribute to the development of novel and more effective therapeutic strategies. Numerous studies have aimed to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying laryngeal cancer development (7–9). Cell cycle proteins have been identified to serve important roles in the carcinogenesis of laryngeal cancer, and the upregulation of cellular tumor antigen p53 (p53), p21 and cyclin dependent kinase 1 in the surgical margin of early cancer is associated with local tumor recurrence (10). Recurrence rates in patients with p27- and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-negative carcinoma were identified to be increased compared with patients with increased expression levels of these factors (11).

Multiple types of RNA, including long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs), pseudogenes and protein-coding mRNAs may serve as key competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) to regulate the expression levels of various mRNAs in mammalian cells (12,13). miR-196a may promote tumor progression in numerous cancer types, and its expression level was identified to be increased in laryngeal cancer (14). miR-221 may increase the cell proliferation rate by inhibiting apoptotic protease activating factor-1 in laryngeal cancer (15), whereas miRNA-299-3p targets the transcript of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (16). NF-κB-interacting lncRNA was identified to inhibit tumor cell viability and to promote apoptosis (17). A previous study analyzed an lncRNA expression dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and identified that two lncRNAs, RP11-169K16.4 and RP11-107E5.3, were associated with the prediction of recurrence of laryngeal cancer (18).

Although various previous studies have investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying laryngeal cancer, the etiology of this malignancy, and in particular of its recurrence, remains unclear. Notably, the regulatory interactions among noncoding and coding RNAs is only partially understood. The present study investigated novel potential molecular biomarkers involved in the recurrence of laryngeal cancer by constructing a ceRNA regulatory network consisting of miRNAs, lncRNAs and mRNAs.

Materials and methods

Training and validation datasets and data processing

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) mRNA samples were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/) on August 8th, 2016. The samples of laryngeal cancer were selected according to the following criteria: i) Laryngeal origin; ii) recurrence status was recorded; and iii) matched mRNAs and miRNAs were barcoded. In total, 84 primary laryngeal cancer samples, including 19 recurrent and 65 nonrecurrent samples, were selected from 501 HNSCC tissues. The training dataset was constructed using the RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data downloaded from the TCGA database.

The gene expression datasets GSE27020 and GSE25727 were downloaded from the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and used as validation datasets. GSE27020 dataset was obtained using the GPL96 platform (Affymetrix human genome U133A array; Affymetrix, Inc.; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and included 34 recurrent and 75 non-recurrent samples. Patients included in this dataset exhibited primary squamous cell laryngeal carcinoma and underwent surgical tumor removal (19). The raw data of this dataset in CIMFast Event Language format were downloaded and processed with gene expression background correction and were normalized using the oligo package version 1.46.0 (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/oligo.html) in R (version 3.1.0; R Foundation, Vienna, Austria; https://www.R project.org/) (20). GSE25727 dataset was generated using the GPL8432 Illumina platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and included 17 recurrent and 39 non-recurrent samples. All the patients were treated locally with surgery or radiotherapy, and none of them received chemotherapy (21). The data from this dataset were downloaded as text files, and the probe identification numbers were converted into gene symbols. In the case of multiple probes corresponding to one gene, the average value was considered as the expression value of this gene using the limma package 3.22.1 (22).

Analysis of differentially expressed lncRNAs, mRNAs and miRNAs

In the training dataset, the mRNAs and lncRNAs were annotated based on the information recorded in the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (http://www.genenames.org/) database. Subsequently, the differentially expressed RNAs, including differentially expressed mRNAs (DEGs), differentially expressed lncRNAs (DE-lncRs) and differentially expressed miRNAs (DE-miRs), between recurrent and nonrecurrent laryngeal cancer samples were analyzed using the EdgeR package version 3.8.5, which adopted an overdispersed Poisson model and an empirical Bayesian approach to improve the reliability of the prediction (23). The thresholds for DEG and DE-lncR selection were based on a false discovery rate (FDR; adjusted P-value) <0.05, whereas for DE-miRs, P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to analyze sample similarity.

Analysis DE-lncRs associated with recurrence

Samples in the training dataset were classified into recurrent and nonrecurrent groups. The DE-lncRs that were significantly differentially expressed between recurrent and nonrecurrent samples were used to perform univariate Cox regression analysis, which was used to select the lncRNAs associated with recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to examine the association between the upregulated or downregulated lncRNAs, and recurrence and survival status.

Prediction of miRNA-regulated lncRNAs and mRNAs

The regulatory interactions among miRNAs and lncRNAs were investigated using the miRcode (http://www.mircode.org/) and starBase (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/) databases. All miRNA-regulated mRNAs were collected from the miRTarBase (http://mirtarbase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw) database. Associations among coding genes were examined using BioGRID (http://thebiogrid.org/), HPRD (http://www.hprd.org/) and DIP (http://dip.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/) databases.

The identified DE-lncRs, DEGs and DE-miRs between recurrent and nonrecurrent samples were included in these regulatory interactions to obtain the lncRNA-miRNA and miRNA-mRNA regulatory networks. These two networks were combined to construct the ceRNA regulatory network, containing the associations among lncRNAs, miRNAs and mRNAs. The ceRNA regulatory network was constructed to investigate the regulatory mechanism underlying the associations among various RNAs. The network was visualized using Cytoscape software version 3.6.1 (24).

Analysis of feature coding genes in the miRNA-mRNA regulatory network

Topological structure analysis was conducted to identify the feature coding genes in the miRNA-mRNA network. The betweenness centrality (BC) of genes, corresponding to the importance of a certain node, or gene, in the network, was calculated using the following formula (25):

Where v, s and t represent the nodes in the network, σst is the number of shortest paths from s to t, and σst (v) is the number of shortest paths from s to t, going through node v. BC values exhibited a range between 0 and 1, and the BC value was correlated with the importance of that node in the network. Therefore, the nodes exhibiting interactions with numerous mRNAs, miRNAs or lncRNAs, were more important in the construction of the network.

The DEGs in the miRNA-mRNA network presenting the 100 highest BC values were selected as candidate feature-coding genes.

Construction of a support vector machine (SVM) classifier for various samples

The candidate genes that were significantly differentially expressed between recurrent and nonrecurrent samples were selected, and the unsupervised clustering classification method was used to validate the sample classification performance of these feature-coding genes (26). The 100 DEGs exhibiting the highest BC values were used to identify the optimal feature-coding gene set using the recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm (27). Through the iterative random feature combination, classification assessment and determination of the performance of various samples (28), the optimal feature-coding gene set was obtained. Subsequently, the set of optimal feature-coding genes was used to construct an SVM classifier, which considered the expression levels of the feature genes within the samples as the feature value to classify and distinguish the samples. The recurrence status of the samples was predicted using the SVM classifier.

The robustness of the classifier were validated using the GSE27020 and GSE25727 datasets. The classification performance was evaluated using sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Molecular function and pathway enrichment analysis

The candidate feature coding genes selected from the ceRNA network were analyzed using Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (29) to investigate the enriched molecular functions and signaling pathways in recurrent laryngeal cancer. Fisher's exact test (Fisher's noncentral hypergeometric distribution) was used to perform the enrichment analysis with the following formula (30):

Where ‘N’ is the total number of genes, ‘M’ is the number of genes in the enriched pathway, ‘K’ is the number of DEGs, and ‘p’ is the probability that at least one DEG belongs to the functional pathway. Multiple hypothesis testing correction was used to identify the categories of GO molecular functions and KEGG pathways.

Results

Screening of DE-lncRs, DEGs and DE-miRs

Using the aforementioned methods for the analysis of the RNA-seq data from the TCGA database, 853 lncRNAs, 18,924 mRNAs and 1,047 human miRNAs were identified. A total of 21 DE-lncRs and 507 DEGs were identified between recurrent and nonrecurrent samples (FDR<0.05). In addition, 55 DE-miRs were identified (P<0.05). The results of the heat maps constructed for DEGs, DE-lncRs and DE-miRs suggested that the differentially expressed RNAs clustered according to the two sample types (Fig. 1). Numerous DEGs (507) were identified between recurrent and nonrecurrent samples.

Figure 1.

Heat map of DE-lncRNAs, DEGs and DE-miRNAs in recurrent and nonrecurrent laryngeal cancer samples. Heat map corresponding to (A) DE-lncRNAs, (B) DEGs and (C) DE-miRNAs. Yellow represents recurrent samples and blue represents nonrecurrent samples. Red indicates upregulated genes and green indicates downregulated genes. DE, differentially expressed; lncRNAs, long noncoding RNAs; DEGs, differentially expressed coding genes; miRNAs, microRNAs.

DE-lncRs associated with recurrence

Following the selection of DE-lncRs between recurrent and nonrecurrent samples, univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the lncRNAs associated with recurrence. In total, five DE-lncRs, including testis-specific transcript, Y-linked 15 (TTTY15), EMX2 opposite strand/antisense RNA (EMX2OS), family with sequence similarity 138 member F, human leukocyte antigen complex group 4 (HCG4) and HOX transcript Antisense RNA (HOTAIR), were identified to be significantly associated with recurrence-free survival time and survival ratio (P<0.05). Survival analysis was conducted and the Kaplan-Meier survival curves (Fig. 2) suggested that the increased expression levels of the five DE-lncRs were associated with poor prognosis.

Figure 2.

KM survival curves for five differentially expressed lncRNAs associated with laryngeal cancer recurrence. Blue curves represent samples with downregulated lncRNAs, and red curves represent samples with upregulated lncRNAs. KM curves corresponding to (A) HCG4, (B) EMX2OS, (C) FAM138F, (D) HOTAIR and (E) TTTY15. KM, Kaplan-Meier; HCG4, HLA complex group 4; EMX2OS, EMX2 opposite strand/antisense RNA; FAM138F, family with sequence similarity 138 member F; HOTAIR, HOX transcript antisense RNA; TTTY15, testis-specific transcript, Y-linked 15; lncRNA, long noncoding RNA.

lncRNA-miRNA, miRNA-mRNA and mRNA-mRNA regulatory networks

By investigating the miRcode and starBase databases, a total of 268 lncRNA-miRNA regulatory interactions were screened. Among these 268 interactions, 14 interactions were present among DE-miRs and DE-lncRNAs. This lncRNA-miRNA regulatory network comprised four DE-lncRs associated with recurrence and seven DE-miRs (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Regulatory network of differentially expressed miR-lncRNA. Diamonds represent miRs and squares represent lncRNAs. Green represents downregulated genes and pink represents upregulated genes. HCG4, HLA complex group 4; HOTAIR, HOX transcript antisense RNA; TTTY15, testis-specific transcript, Y-linked 15; lncRNA, long noncoding RNA; miR, microRNA.

According to the information in the miRTarBase database, the DEGs regulated by the seven DE-miRs were investigated. A total of 55, 59, 34, 7, 17, 69 and 0 interacting DEGs were reported for hsa-miR-1, hsa-miR-124, hsa-miR-133a, hsa-miR-184, hsa-miR-208a, hsa-miR-33b and hsa-miR-499, respectively. Therefore, an miRNA-mRNA regulatory network was established comprising six miRNAs and 193 mRNAs (Fig. 4). Additionally to the DEGs, 22 coding genes exhibiting interactions with at least five DEGs were included in the network, as determined using the BioGRID, HPRD and DIP databases.

Figure 4.

miRNA-mRNA regulatory network corresponding to genes differentially expressed between recurrent and nonrecurrent samples. Circles represent mRNAs and diamonds represent miRNAs. Green represents downregulated genes, pink represents upregulated genes, and white circles represent genes associated with at least five miRNA-interacting genes.

Feature coding gene identification

The 100 coding genes, including 86 DEGs and 14 DEG-associated genes, exhibiting the highest BC values in the miRNA-mRNA network were examined. The 86 DEGs were used to perform clustering analysis, and the results suggested that the DEGs clustered according to the two types of samples (Fig. 5). Similar results were identified when all the DEGs were considered for the clustering analysis (Fig. 2). The present results suggested that the 86 DEGs may be used as feature-coding genes for sample grouping.

Figure 5.

Heat map of 86 feature coding genes identified by the betweenness centrality values in the microRNA-mRNA network. Yellow represents recurrent samples and blue represents nonrecurrent samples. Red indicates upregulated genes and green indicates downregulated genes.

SVM classifier

The RFE algorithm was used to refine the list of feature-coding genes, and 32 optimal feature-coding genes exhibiting the highest predictive accuracy (94.05%) for sample grouping were selected. The 32 coding genes are presented in Table I. The SVM classifier constructed using the 32 feature-coding genes presented high accuracy (94.05%, 79/84) in separating the recurrent samples from the nonrecurrent samples.

Table I.

Basic information of 32 optimal feature-coding genes, among the genes significantly differentially expressed between recurrent and nonrecurrent cancer samples.

Gene symbol	Betweenness centrality	Number of interactions	P-value	Log2 fold-change
SHISA6	0.240	4	0.028	0.544
MAGEA2	0.215	5	0.047	−0.394
TRDN	0.156	6	0.002	0.601
RGS7	0.149	4	0.001	1.331
CPNE4	0.142	4	0.020	0.657
CALCA	0.111	3	0.004	1.214
GABRG2	0.101	2	0.035	0.599
TECRL	0.083	3	0.043	0.846
MYLK2	0.073	3	0.005	0.543
MYO3A	0.058	3	0.048	0.365
ASB10	0.057	3	0.001	1.261
WT1	0.039	4	0.015	0.712
CALCB	0.038	2	0.006	0.986
OPCML	0.038	2	0.011	0.693
KY	0.038	2	0.011	0.502
CYP3A43	0.038	2	0.027	−2.312
EPHA6	0.038	2	0.001	1.216
SLC6A20	0.038	2	0.001	0.583
NCAM2	0.036	2	0.026	0.451
FLRT3	0.033	2	0.022	0.312
TMC5	0.033	2	0.034	−0.334
AADACL3	0.033	2	0.011	0.983
ANKRD1	0.026	6	0.005	0.520
CLDN22	0.020	2	0.005	−1.662
FGF5	0.018	2	0.015	0.593
SCN5A	0.016	2	0.009	0.475
PTPRR	0.016	2	0.005	0.561
LDHC	0.015	2	0.000	−1.366
OLFM3	0.012	2	0.036	1.283
HRASLS5	0.012	2	0.042	−0.560
SPINK6	0.010	2	0.011	−0.533
SPESP1	0.008	2	0.004	0.499

By examining the two validation datasets, the SVM classifier was able to distinguish 101 samples (30 recurrent and 71 non-recurrent) and 51 samples (16 recurrent and 35 non-recurrent) from the GSE27020 and GSE25727 datasets (Fig. 6) with an accuracy of 92.66 and 91.07%, respectively. The scatter plot of sample classifications is presented in Fig. 7. The five indicators (Se, Sp, PPV, NPV and AUC) presented high scores (Table II). AUC exhibited the highest score among the five indicators (Fig. 8). The present results suggested that the SVM classifier exhibited high accuracy and reliability in grouping samples from various datasets.

Figure 6.

Classification effect of the support vector machine classifier. Classification effect was investigated on the two validation datasets, (A) GSE27020 and (B) GSE25727. Yellow represents recurrent samples and blue represents nonrecurrent samples. Red indicates upregulated genes and green indicates downregulated genes.

Figure 7.

Scatter plot of samples classification using the SVM classifier. (A) Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. (B) GSE27020 dataset. (C) GSE25727 dataset. Blue represents nonrecurrent samples and red represents recurrent samples. SVM, support vector machine.

Table II.

Classifying parameters of the support vector machine classifier for the three datasets analyzed.

Dataset	Number of samples	Accuracy	Sensitivity	Specificity	Positive predictive value	Negative predictive value	Area under receiver operating characteristic curve
TCGA	84	0.9410	0.947	0.938	0.818	0.984	0.986
GSE27020	109	0.9266	0.882	0.947	0.882	0.947	0.946
GSE25727	56	0.9107	0.941	0.897	0.8	0.972	0.921

TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Figure 8.

AUC of the support vector machine classifier on sample classification. (A) Sample grouping of The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. (B) Sample grouping of the GSE27020 dataset. (C) Sample grouping of the GSE25727 dataset. AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

The ceRNA regulatory network comprised 203 nodes and 346 lines and was constructed by combining the lncRNA-miRNA regulatory network and the miRNA-mRNA regulatory network (Fig. 9). In the network, a node indicated a transcript (mRNA, miRNA or lncRNA), whereas a line indicated the association between two nodes. The coding genes in the ceRNA network were significantly enriched in 11 pathway categories, including ‘neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction’, ‘salivary secretion’ and ‘tight junction’ (Table III), and 16 molecular function categories, including ‘muscle contraction’, ‘muscle system process’ and ‘blood circulation’ (Table IV). The multiple hypotheses testing correction results for the GO molecular function and KEGG pathway categories were not statistically significant (data not shown).

Figure 9.

Competing endogenous RNA regulatory network of all DE-miRNAs, DE-lncRNAs and DEGs. Circles represent mRNAs, diamonds represent miRNAs and squares represent lncRNAs. Green represents downregulated genes, pink represents upregulated genes and white circles represent genes associated with at least five miRNA-interacting genes. miRNA, microRNA; DE, differentially expressed; lncRNA, long noncoding RNA.

Table III.

Significantly enriched pathways in the competing endogenous RNA regulatory network.

KEGG pathway ID	KEGG pathway name	Gene count	P-value	Differentially expressed genes
hsa04530	Tight junction	5	0.001	MYH1, CLDN6, MYH4, CTNNA2, CLDN10
hsa04970	Salivary secretion	4	0.001	HTN3, ATP1B4, ATP1A2, STATH
hsa04080	Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction	6	0.004	GABRA2, GABRG2, PTH2R, OPRK1, CHRNA1, GRIK2
hsa04918	Thyroid hormone synthesis	3	0.007	6528, ATP1B4, ATP1A2
hsa04964	Proximal tubule bicarbonate reclamation	2	0.008	ATP1B4, ATP1A2
hsa04960	Aldosterone-regulated sodium reabsorption	2	0.020	ATP1B4, ATP1A2
hsa05033	Nicotine addiction	2	0.020	GABRA2, GABRG2
hsa04973	Carbohydrate digestion and absorption	2	0.025	ATP1B4, ATP1A2
hsa04670	Leukocyte transendothelial migration	3	0.026	CLDN6, CTNNA2, CLDN10
hsa04978	Mineral absorption	2	0.032	ATP1B4, ATP1A2
hsa04514	Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)	3	0.041	CLDN6, NCAM2, CLDN10

KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Table IV.

Significantly enriched molecular functions in the competing endogenous RNA regulatory network.

GO term ID	GO term name	Gene count	P-value	Genes
GO:0006936	Muscle contraction	11	4.17×10−7	TRDN, ACTC1, MYH1, MYL1, MYLK2, MYH4, SMPX, TTN, CHRNA1, SCN5A, CASQ2
GO:0003012	Muscle system process	11	9.88×10−7	TRDN, ACTC1, MYH1, MYL1, MYLK2, MYH4, SMPX, TTN, CHRNA1, SCN5A, CASQ2
GO:0008015	Blood circulation	10	1.89×10−5	CALCA, CALCB, ACTC1, MYL1, MYLK2, CARTPT, ATP1A2, TAC4, SCN5A, EPO
GO:0003013	Circulatory system process	10	1.89×10−5	CALCA, CALCB, ACTC1, MYL1, MYLK2, CARTPT, ATP1A2, TAC4, SCN5A, EPO
GO:0007267	Cell-cell signaling	16	9.03×10−5	FGF5, GABRG2, GABRA2, GRIK2, OPRK1, MYLK2, ATP1A2, CXCL6, IL22, CTNNA2, CALCA, PNOC, SLC1A6, CARTPT, SLC30A8, CHRNA1
GO:0006811	Ion transport	18	1.32×10−4	GABRG2, SLC5A5, GABRA2, GRIK2, ATP1B4, KCNA6, ATP1A2, TCN1, BEST3, SLC1A6, SLC5A8, LTF, ANO5, ANO4, CHRNA1, SLC30A8, SCN5A, ADD2
GO:0007268	Synaptic transmission	11	1.44×10−4	GABRG2, GABRA2, PNOC, GRIK2, OPRK1, SLC1A6, MYLK2, CARTPT, ATP1A2, CHRNA1, CTNNA2
GO:0030182	Neuron differentiation	13	2.09×10−4	NCAM2, SLITRK4, SOX1, OPCML, FOXA2, PKHD1, EMX2, MDGA2, PTPRR, POU4F1, OLFM3, NEFL, CTNNA2
GO:0019226	Transmission of nerve impulse	11	5.20×10−4	GABRG2, GABRA2, PNOC, GRIK2, OPRK1, SLC1A6, MYLK2, CARTPT, ATP1A2, CHRNA1, CTNNA2
GO:0055082	Cellular chemical homeostasis	10	3.60×10−3	CALCA, CALCB, XIRP1, GRIK2, SLC1A6, LTF, CARTPT, ATP1A2, SLC30A8, CHRNA1
GO:0019725	Cellular homeostasis	10	1.29×10−2	CALCA, CALCB, XIRP1, GRIK2, SLC1A6, LTF, CARTPT, ATP1A2, SLC30A8, CHRNA1
GO:0048878	Chemical homeostasis	10	2.24×10−2	CALCA, CALCB, XIRP1, GRIK2, SLC1A6, LTF, CARTPT, ATP1A2, SLC30A8, CHRNA1
GO:0007155	Cell adhesion	12	2.54×10−2	IBSP, FLRT3, CALCA, NCAM2, AMBN, OPCML, FAT3, PKHD1, CLDN6, CLDN22, CLDN10, CTNNA2
GO:0022610	Biological adhesion	12	2.56×10−2	IBSP, FLRT3, CALCA, NCAM2, AMBN, OPCML, FAT3, PKHD1, CLDN6, CLDN22, CLDN10, CTNNA2
GO:0050877	Neurological system process	17	3.28×10−2	GABRG2, GABRA2, MYO3A, GRIK2, OPRK1, MYLK2, ATP1A2, TAS1R1, CTNNA2, CALCA, NCAM2, PNOC, SLC1A6, CARTPT, POU4F1, CHRNA1, NEFL
GO:0042592	Homeostatic process	12	3.94×10−2	CALCA, CALCB, XIRP1, GRIK2, PKHD1, SLC1A6, LTF, CARTPT, ATP1A2, SLC30A8, CHRNA1, EPO

GO, Gene Ontology.

ceRNA regulatory network of 32 optimal feature-coding genes

The ceRNA regulatory network corresponding to the 32 optimal feature coding genes was established and consisted of six DE-miRs, four DE-lncRs and 32 feature-coding genes (Fig. 10). In the ceRNA network, the interactions between HCG4-miR-33b, HOTAIR-miR-1-MAGE family member A2 (MAGEA2), EMX2OS-miR-124-calcitonin related polypeptide α (CALCA) and EMX2OS-miR-124-γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor γ2 subunit (GABRG2) exhibited the highest scores. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves of these six DE-miRs suggested a significant association between recurrence-free survival times and the expression levels of the miRNAs examined, including hsa-miR-33b, hsa-miR-124, hsa-miR-133a and hsa-miR-208a (P<0.05; Fig. 11).

Figure 10.

Competing endogenous RNA regulatory network of DE-miRNAs, DE-lncRNAs, and 32 optimal feature coding genes. Circles represent mRNAs, diamonds represent miRNAs and squares represent lncRNAs. Green represents downregulated genes, pink represents upregulated genes and white circles represent genes associated with at least five miRNA-interacting genes. DE, differentially expressed; miRNA, microRNA; lncRNA, long noncoding RNA.

Figure 11.

KM survival curves of the differentially expressed miRs in the competing endogenous RNA regulatory network constructed using 32 optimal feature coding genes. Blue curves represent samples with downregulated miRs and red curves represent samples with upregulated miRs. (A) hsa-miR-1. (B) hsa-miR-33b. (C) hsa-miR-124. (D) hsa-miR-133a. (E) hsa-miR-184. (F) hsa-miR-208a. KM, Kaplan-Meier; miR, microRNA.

Discussion

By analyzing the RNA-seq data downloaded from TCGA, the DE-miRs, DEGs and DE-lncRs between recurrent and nonrecurrent laryngeal cancer samples were identified. Based on the associations identified in various databases, numerous networks (miRNA-mRNA, lncRNA-mRNA and ceRNA networks) were constructed to examine the potential interactions among feature-coding genes, miRNAs and lncRNAs. The aim of the present study was to identify the regulatory mechanisms underlying the recurrence of laryngeal cancer. In the ceRNA network, the interactions between HCG4-miR-33b, HOTAIR-miR-1- MAGEA2, EMX2OS-miR-124- CALCA and EMX2OS-miR-124-GABRG2 exhibited the highest scores. According to the BC values in the miRNA-mRNA network and the RFE algorithm, 32 optimal feature-coding genes, including MAGEA2, CALCA and GABRG2 were identified to be associated with recurrent laryngeal cancer samples. Since the 32 feature-coding genes were identified by analyzing the miRNA-mRNA network, all 32 coding genes were associated with DE-miRs. The SVM classifier constructed using these feature-coding genes exhibited high accuracy in grouping samples from the TCGA dataset (94.05%) and from the two validation datasets (GSE27020: 92.66%; GSE25727: 91.07%).

miR-206 serves an important role in the inhibition of tumor proliferation and metastasis in numerous cancer types (31–33). In laryngeal cancer, miR-206 may serve as a tumor suppressor by targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (34). miR-1, a homolog of miR-206 (35), was identified as a DE-miR in the present ceRNA network and may serve a role in the control of laryngeal cancer recurrence. The present bioinformatics analyses identified that miR-1 may be associated with the lncRNA HOTAIR in laryngeal cancer. In LSCC, HOTAIR is upregulated and associated with the risk of lymphatic metastasis, and with poor prognosis (36,37). In addition, the oncogenic role of HOTAIR may be associated with PTEN methylation (38). To the best of the authors' knowledge, no previous study has investigated the regulatory association between miR-1 and HOTAIR in laryngeal cancer. However, miR-1 was demonstrated to be a direct downstream target of HOTAIR in thyroid cancer cells, and miR-1 inhibition may promote HOTAIR-mediated tumor progression (39). In bladder cancer cells, the increased expression of miR-1 is negatively associated with HOTAIR (40). In the present ceRNA network, MAGEA2 was identified to be a potential target of miR-1. In HNSCC, MAGEA2 is upregulated and promotes the growth of normal oral keratinocytes, partly via the p53 pathway (41). Collectively, the interaction HOTAIR-miR-1-MAGEA2 may serve a regulatory role in the progression of laryngeal cancer.

miR-33b belongs to the miR-33 family and regulates cholesterol homeostasis, and lipid and glucose metabolism (42). A previous study observed that miR-33b may inhibit the metastasis of breast cancer (43). In gastric cancer, curcumin exerts its inhibitory activity by upregulating the expression level of miR-33b (44). In laryngeal cancer, a previous study identified that miR-33a may exert antiproliferative effects by targeting pim-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (45). In the present ceRNA network, miR-33b was associated with the lncRNA HCG4, which was identified to be a candidate gene in multiple sclerosis (46); however, its role in laryngeal cancer remains unclear. The present results suggested that HCG4 was a DE-lncR associated with the recurrence of laryngeal cancer, which interacted with miR-33b. Therefore, these two molecular factors may be associated with and may serve important functional roles during the recurrence of laryngeal cancer.

miR-124 has been identified to serve a role in numerous cancer types (47,48). Hypermethylation of miR-124 may result in the development of colon, breast and lung cancer (49). The downregulation of miR-124 expression may suppress nasopharyngeal carcinoma (50). Furthermore, the expression level of miR-124 is associated with recurrence in patients with lung cancer (51). In HNSCC, miR-124 serves as a tumor suppressor gene (52) and inhibits the epithelial-restricted with serine box/epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway (53). In the present study, miR-124 was identified to be differentially expressed between recurrent and nonrecurrent laryngeal cancer samples. Therefore, miR-124 may serve as a tumor suppressor gene in laryngeal cancer and may be associated with laryngeal cancer recurrence. The present ceRNA network results suggested that EMX2OS and TTTY15 were two lncRNAs that may interact with miR-124. EMX2OS was previously identified to be associated with brain diseases (54). In comparison with healthy controls, patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome exhibited an increase in the expression level of EMX2OS (55). EMX2OS is expressed in the central nervous system, similarly to empty spiracles homeobox 2 (54). The gene fusion zinc finger DHHC-type containing 2-TTTY15 was identified as one of four fusion genes in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia, by whole genome sequencing (56). The fusion gene TTTY15-ubiquitin specific peptidase 9 Y-linked (USP9Y) exhibited high prevalence among Chinese patients with prostate cancer, and the TTTY15-USP9Y fusion is an independent predictor of prostate cancer (57). To the best of the authors' knowledge, no previous studies have reported the association between TTTY15 or EMX2OS and laryngeal cancer. Therefore, these lncRNAs may represent novel biomarkers or may exhibit gene fusion in laryngeal cancer. In addition, miR-184 expression is upregulated in the majority of HNSCC tumors (58). In the present study, miR-124 and miR-184 were associated with the lncRNA EMX2OS, suggesting a potential role EMX2OS in the regulation of laryngeal cancer. Among the genes interacting with miR-124, the present study identified that CALCA and GABRG2 were associated with recurrent laryngeal carcinoma. A previous study demonstrated that methylation of CALCA was identified to be detected in 70% of patients with recurrent thyroid cancer (59). Therefore, CALCA and GABRG2 may serve important roles in the recurrence of laryngeal cancer, and the regulatory mechanism underlying laryngeal cancer recurrence may involve the EMX2OS-miR-124-CALCA/GABRG2 axis.

The SVM classifier is an effective classification method. The SVM classifier has been used to classify various cancer samples, in cancer subtypes including melanoma (60), metastatic breast cancer (61) and lung cancer (62). The SVM classifier was constructed to identify the feature-coding genes that may be able to discriminate recurrent from nonrecurrent laryngeal cancer samples. In the present study, the SVM classifier comprising 32 feature coding genes exhibited high accuracy in sample classification. Specifically, the SVM classifier exhibited high accuracy in the two validation datasets, suggesting that this method was a reliable classification method.

Although the present bioinformatics results were tested using validation datasets, the present study exhibited two limitations. Since the samples were derived from TCGA and GEO databases, the sample size may be limited. Furthermore, the present results require validation in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, further experiments are required to be performed in the future to confirm the present study. Nevertheless, the present results may provide useful insights for improving the understanding of the pathogenesis of laryngeal cancer recurrence.

In conclusion, an SVM classifier composed of 32 feature-coding genes classified recurrent and nonrecurrent laryngeal cancer samples with high accuracy. miR-1, miR-33b, miR-124, HOTAIR, HCG4 and EMX2OS may represent a signature of noncoding RNAs in recurrent laryngeal cancer. The interactions HCG4-miR-33b, HOTAIR-miR-1-MAGEA2 and EMX2OS-miR-124-CALCA/GABRG2 may be important in the regulation of the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of recurrent laryngeal cancer.