| Literature DB >> 31058823 |
Silvia Zappavigna1, Daniela Vanacore2, Stefania Lama3, Nicoletta Potenza4, Aniello Russo5, Pasquale Ferranti6, Marcello Dallio7, Alessandro Federico8, Carmelina Loguercio9, Pasquale Sperlongano10, Michele Caraglia11, Paola Stiuso12.
Abstract
Silybin is a flavonolignan extracted from Silybum marianum (milk thistle) with hepatoprotective, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity. Several studies have shown that silybin is highly effective to prevent and treat different types of cancer and that its antitumor mechanisms involve the arrest of the cell cycle and/or apoptosis. An MTT assay was performed to study cell viability, lipid peroxidation, extracellular NO production, and scavenger enzyme activity were studied by Thiobarbituric Acid-Reactive Species (TBARS) assay, NO assay, and MnSOD assay, respectively. Cell cycle and apoptosis analysis were performed by FACS. miRNA profiling were evaluated by real time PCR. In this study, we demonstrated that Silybin induced growth inhibition blocking the Hepg2 cells in G1 phase of cell cycle and activating the process of programmed cell death. Moreover, the antiproliferative effects of silybin were paralleled by a strong increase of the number of ceramides involved in the modulation of miRNA secretion. In particular, after treatment with silybin, miR223-3p and miR16-5p were upregulated, while miR-92-3p was downregulated (p < 0.05). In conclusion, our results suggest that silybin-Induced apoptosis occurs in parallel to the increase of ceramides synthesis and miRNAs secretion in HepG2 cells.Entities:
Keywords: PTEN; apoptosis; ceramides; hepatocarcinoma; miRNAs; silybin; sorafenib
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31058823 PMCID: PMC6539179 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20092190
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Dose-response effects of silybin on HCC cells. HepG2 cells were seeded and treated with different concentrations of Silybin (0–200 mM) for 72 h, and thereafter cell viability was assessed as described in “Materials and Methods”. The experiment was repeated three times and the results are the mean of the different data. Bars represent standard deviations.
Figure 2Antioxidant activity of silybin. HepG2 cells were seeded and treated with IC50 of Silybin for 72 h, and thereafter thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS), NO production, and MnSOD activity were assessed as described in “Materials and Methods”. The experiment was repeated three times and the results are the mean of the different data. Bars represent standard deviations.
Figure 3Effects of silybin on cell cycle. (up) Cell cycle distribution after 72 h of treatment with silybin IC50 (68 μM) in HepG2 cells, evaluated by FACS, as described in Materials and Methods. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of the percentage of cells in the different phases of the cell cycle, as compared with untreated control cells. (down) Effects of silybin on p21 and cyclin A expression in HepG2 cells. γ-tubulin was used as loading control. The intensity of each band was expressed as % arbitrary units compared to that of the untreated cells. Error bars showed standard deviation from the mean in at least three independent experiments.
Figure 4Effects of silybin on apoptosis. Apoptosis after 72 h from treatment with silybin IC50 (68 μM) in HepG2 cells was evaluated by FACS as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Untreated cells (Ctr); (B) silybin-treated cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of the percentage of cells in the different phases of the cell cycle, as compared with untreated control cells.
MALDI-TOF mass spectra of cellular lipids.
| Assignment | Ctr | Sil | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 545.56 ± 1 | Cer(t20:0/26:0) | + | + |
| 551.49 ± 1 | Cer(m18:1(4E)/18:0) | + | − |
| 599.92 ± 1 | Cer(t18:0/18:0(2OH)) | − | + |
| 567.63 ± 1 | Cer(d18:0/18:0) | + | + |
| 637.8 ± 1 | Cer(d14:1(4E)/26:0(2OH)) | − | + |
| 659.84 ± 1 | PE-Cer(d14:2(4E,6E)/20:0) | − | + |
| 675.76 ± 1 | PE-Cer(d16:1(4E)/19:0) | − | + |
| 703.9 ± C16 | Sphingomyelin | + | + |
| 725.84 ± 1 | Cer(t20:0/26:0) | + | + |
| 732.77 ± 1 | GlcCer(t18:1(8Z)/16:0(2OH[S])) | − | − |
| 760.98 ± 1 | GlcCer(t18:1(8Z)/18:0 | − | + |
| 782.76 ± 1 | PI-Cer(d20:0/14:0) | + | + |
| 788.77 ± 1 | C22 Sphingomyelin | − | − |
Ctr: untreated cells; sil: silybin-treated cells.
Figure 5miRNA profiling. Fold regulation of miRNA levels detectable in the medium of silybin-treated cells versus untreated cells. p-values of the Student’s t-test were * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, or *** p < 0.001.
Synergism between silybin and sorafenib.
| Drug | IC50 μM | IC50 μM | CI50 | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorafenib | 5±0.02 | 1.25±0.003 | 0.4 | Strong synergism |
| Silybin | 68±0.03 | 51±0.01 |
Figure 6Silybin increases the cytotoxic effect of sorafenib. Effects of silybin (sil), sorafenib (sor) on AKT, GSK3 expression, in HepG2 cells transfected or not, with mutated PTEN (PTEN mut) was evaluated by Western blotting. γ-tubulin was used as loading control; standard deviation from the mean in at least three independent experiments.
Fold regulation of miRNA levels detectable in the medium of silybin (sil), sorafenib (sor), and silybin/sorafenib-treated cells versus untreated cells (ctr). * highly significant.
| hsa-miR-92a-3p | ||
|---|---|---|
| Fold Regulation | ||
| Sil vs. ctr | −2.55 | 0.036 * |
| Sor vs. ctr | n.d | n.d |
| Sil/Sor vs. ctr | −5.55 | 0.002 * |