Literature DB >> 31058683

Patient Stakeholder Versus Physician Preferences Regarding Amyloid PET Testing.

Melissa J Armstrong1, Gary S Gronseth2, Gregory S Day3, Carol Rheaume4, Slande Alliance1, C D Mullins5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient and caregiver perspectives on amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) use are largely unexplored, particularly as compared with clinician views.
METHODS: We surveyed clinicians, patients, caregivers, and dementia advocates on topics relating to an evidence-based guideline on amyloid PET use. Topic importance was rated on a 9-point scale. Patient stakeholder and clinician views were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: Patient representatives (n=107) rated all survey topics as equal to or more important than clinicians (n=114) except 1 item discussing potential harms of false-positive diagnoses. Differences between patient representative and clinician populations were greatest when comparing the competing values of false-positive and false-negative diagnoses and the value of testing asymptomatic individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients and caregivers emphasized the importance of having a dementia diagnosis and placed more value on testing and outcomes for asymptomatic populations than clinicians. This underscores the importance of research investigating the effect of amyloid PET results on asymptomatic individuals and the need for amyloid PET ordering and disclosure standards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31058683      PMCID: PMC6710130          DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord        ISSN: 0893-0341            Impact factor:   2.703


  37 in total

1.  GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Regina Kunz; David Atkins; Jan Brozek; Gunn Vist; Philip Alderson; Paul Glasziou; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Disclosure of positron emission tomography amyloid imaging results: A preliminary study of safety and tolerability.

Authors:  Yen Ying Lim; Paul Maruff; Christine Getter; Peter J Snyder
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Safety of disclosing amyloid status in cognitively normal older adults.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Burns; David K Johnson; Edward P Liebmann; Rebecca J Bothwell; Jill K Morris; Eric D Vidoni
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 21.566

4.  Association of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography With Changes in Diagnosis and Patient Treatment in an Unselected Memory Clinic Cohort: The ABIDE Project.

Authors:  Arno de Wilde; Wiesje M van der Flier; Wiesje Pelkmans; Femke Bouwman; Jurre Verwer; Colin Groot; Marieke M van Buchem; Marissa Zwan; Rik Ossenkoppele; Maqsood Yaqub; Marleen Kunneman; Ellen M A Smets; Frederik Barkhof; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Andrew Stephens; Erik van Lier; Geert Jan Biessels; Bart N van Berckel; Philip Scheltens
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 18.302

5.  On the personal utility of Alzheimer's disease-related biomarker testing in the research context.

Authors:  Eline M Bunnik; Edo Richard; Richard Milne; Maartje H N Schermer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Diagnosis and disclosure of a memory problem is associated with quality of life in community based older Australians with dementia.

Authors:  Karen E Mate; Constance D Pond; Parker J Magin; Susan M Goode; Patrick McElduff; Nigel P Stocks
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.878

7.  Expectations, experiences, and tensions in the memory clinic: the process of diagnosis disclosure of dementia within a triad.

Authors:  Orit Karnieli-Miller; Perla Werner; Judith Aharon-Peretz; Gary Sinoff; Shmuel Eidelman
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.878

8.  Attitudes of Research Participants and the General Public Regarding Disclosure of Alzheimer Disease Research Results.

Authors:  Jonathan Gooblar; Catherine M Roe; Natalie J Selsor; Matthew J Gabel; John C Morris
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 9.  NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Clifford R Jack; David A Bennett; Kaj Blennow; Maria C Carrillo; Billy Dunn; Samantha Budd Haeberlein; David M Holtzman; William Jagust; Frank Jessen; Jason Karlawish; Enchi Liu; Jose Luis Molinuevo; Thomas Montine; Creighton Phelps; Katherine P Rankin; Christopher C Rowe; Philip Scheltens; Eric Siemers; Heather M Snyder; Reisa Sperling
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 21.566

10.  A review of barriers and enablers to diagnosis and management of persons with dementia in primary care.

Authors:  Faranak Aminzadeh; Frank J Molnar; William B Dalziel; Debbie Ayotte
Journal:  Can Geriatr J       Date:  2012-09-20
View more
  3 in total

1.  Aducanumab Use in Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease Evidence in Focus: A Report of the AAN Guidelines Subcommittee.

Authors:  Gregory S Day; Nikolaos Scarmeas; Richard Dubinsky; Katherine Coerver; Anitra Mostacero; Brooks West; Scott R Wessels; Melissa J Armstrong
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 11.800

2.  What Influences the Willingness of Blacks and African Americans to Enroll in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker Research? A Qualitative Vignette Analysis.

Authors:  Fred B Ketchum; Claire M Erickson; Nathaniel A Chin; Carey E Gleason; Nickolas H Lambrou; Susan Flowers Benton; Lindsay R Clark
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.160

3.  Participation and consultation engagement strategies have complementary roles: A case study of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guideline development.

Authors:  Melissa J Armstrong; Gary S Gronseth; Anna R Gagliardi; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 3.377

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.