Anissa Messaaoui1, Sylvie Tenoutasse1, Laurent Crenier2. 1. 1 Diabetology Clinic, Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola, Brussels, Belgium-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium. 2. 2 Department of Endocrinology, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium.
Abstract
Background: Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) is covered by the Belgian public health insurance for type 1 diabetes since 2016. The objective of this study was to describe the use of FGM and diabetes outcomes in type 1 diabetic children and adolescents 1 year after reimbursement. Methods: All patients had the choice to convert to FGM or to continue with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Clinical data were collected at baseline, at the next visit, and after 12 months; glucose profiles at next visit and after 12 months. Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of FGM acceptance and changes in metabolic control. Results: A total of 334 subjects were included, of whom 278 (83.2%) switched to FGM. They were younger (13.6 vs. 15.2 years; P = 0.012) and performed more SMBG testing at baseline than patients who did not switch (4.3 vs. 4.1 tests daily; P = 0.008). At the end of follow-up, the rate of severe hypoglycemia decreased by 53% in the group of FGM users (P = 0.012) while it remained stable in SMBG users. Median glycated hemoglobin did not change significantly in both groups. Among subjects who switched to FGM, 15.8% reverted to SMBG after a median use of 5.3 months. Adverse events, diabetes duration, and FGM utilization were independent predictors of the risk for reverting. FGM-related adverse events were associated with a fivefold increased risk to revert to SMBG (hazard ratio = 5.12; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: FGM is relatively well accepted and decreases the risk of severe hypoglycemic events in our pediatric population. FGM is more often discontinued in patients experiencing adverse events and with longer diabetes duration.
Background: Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) is covered by the Belgian public health insurance for type 1 diabetes since 2016. The objective of this study was to describe the use of FGM and diabetes outcomes in type 1 diabeticchildren and adolescents 1 year after reimbursement. Methods: All patients had the choice to convert to FGM or to continue with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Clinical data were collected at baseline, at the next visit, and after 12 months; glucose profiles at next visit and after 12 months. Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of FGM acceptance and changes in metabolic control. Results: A total of 334 subjects were included, of whom 278 (83.2%) switched to FGM. They were younger (13.6 vs. 15.2 years; P = 0.012) and performed more SMBG testing at baseline than patients who did not switch (4.3 vs. 4.1 tests daily; P = 0.008). At the end of follow-up, the rate of severe hypoglycemia decreased by 53% in the group of FGM users (P = 0.012) while it remained stable in SMBG users. Median glycated hemoglobin did not change significantly in both groups. Among subjects who switched to FGM, 15.8% reverted to SMBG after a median use of 5.3 months. Adverse events, diabetes duration, and FGM utilization were independent predictors of the risk for reverting. FGM-related adverse events were associated with a fivefold increased risk to revert to SMBG (hazard ratio = 5.12; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: FGM is relatively well accepted and decreases the risk of severe hypoglycemic events in our pediatric population. FGM is more often discontinued in patients experiencing adverse events and with longer diabetes duration.
Entities:
Keywords:
HbA; Self-monitoring of blood glucose; Type 1 diabetes
Authors: Anita Jeyam; Fraser W Gibb; John A McKnight; Joseph E O'Reilly; Thomas M Caparrotta; Andreas Höhn; Stuart J McGurnaghan; Luke A K Blackbourn; Sara Hatam; Brian Kennon; Rory J McCrimmon; Graham Leese; Sam Philip; Naveed Sattar; Paul M McKeigue; Helen M Colhoun Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Marco Castellana; Claudia Parisi; Sergio Di Molfetta; Ludovico Di Gioia; Annalisa Natalicchio; Sebastio Perrini; Angelo Cignarelli; Luigi Laviola; Francesco Giorgino Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-06
Authors: Isabel Leiva-Gea; Maria F Martos-Lirio; Ana Gómez-Perea; Ana-Belen Ariza-Jiménez; Leopoldo Tapia-Ceballos; Jose Manuel Jiménez-Hinojosa; Juan Pedro Lopez-Siguero Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 4.241