Literature DB >> 31058545

Flash Glucose Monitoring Accepted in Daily Life of Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes and Reduction of Severe Hypoglycemia in Real-Life Use.

Anissa Messaaoui1, Sylvie Tenoutasse1, Laurent Crenier2.   

Abstract

Background: Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) is covered by the Belgian public health insurance for type 1 diabetes since 2016. The objective of this study was to describe the use of FGM and diabetes outcomes in type 1 diabetic children and adolescents 1 year after reimbursement.
Methods: All patients had the choice to convert to FGM or to continue with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Clinical data were collected at baseline, at the next visit, and after 12 months; glucose profiles at next visit and after 12 months. Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of FGM acceptance and changes in metabolic control.
Results: A total of 334 subjects were included, of whom 278 (83.2%) switched to FGM. They were younger (13.6 vs. 15.2 years; P = 0.012) and performed more SMBG testing at baseline than patients who did not switch (4.3 vs. 4.1 tests daily; P = 0.008). At the end of follow-up, the rate of severe hypoglycemia decreased by 53% in the group of FGM users (P = 0.012) while it remained stable in SMBG users. Median glycated hemoglobin did not change significantly in both groups. Among subjects who switched to FGM, 15.8% reverted to SMBG after a median use of 5.3 months. Adverse events, diabetes duration, and FGM utilization were independent predictors of the risk for reverting. FGM-related adverse events were associated with a fivefold increased risk to revert to SMBG (hazard ratio = 5.12; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: FGM is relatively well accepted and decreases the risk of severe hypoglycemic events in our pediatric population. FGM is more often discontinued in patients experiencing adverse events and with longer diabetes duration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HbA; Self-monitoring of blood glucose; Type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31058545     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2018.0339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  10 in total

1.  Cutaneous Complications With Continuous or Flash Glucose Monitoring Use: Systematic Review of Trials and Observational Studies.

Authors:  Nurul A Mohd Asarani; Andrew N Reynolds; Sara E Boucher; Martin de Bock; Benjamin J Wheeler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-27

2.  Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Summary Review of Recent Real-World Evidence.

Authors:  Clifford J Bailey; James R Gavin
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2021-01

3.  Flash monitor initiation is associated with improvements in HbA1c levels and DKA rates among people with type 1 diabetes in Scotland: a retrospective nationwide observational study.

Authors:  Anita Jeyam; Fraser W Gibb; John A McKnight; Joseph E O'Reilly; Thomas M Caparrotta; Andreas Höhn; Stuart J McGurnaghan; Luke A K Blackbourn; Sara Hatam; Brian Kennon; Rory J McCrimmon; Graham Leese; Sam Philip; Naveed Sattar; Paul M McKeigue; Helen M Colhoun
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Sensor-Based Technology: Bringing Value to People with Diabetes and the Healthcare System in an Evolving World.

Authors:  Judith L Glennie; Lori Berard; Fleur Levrat-Guillen
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-02-10

5.  Impact of flash glucose monitoring on glycemic control varies with the age and residual β-cell function of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Liyin Zhang; Yaling Xu; Xiaofang Jiang; Jieru Wu; Fang Liu; Li Fan; Xia Li; Guangming Yin; Lin Yang
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.232

6.  Comparison Between Continuous Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Anissa Messaaoui; Sylvie Tenoutasse; Lucia Hajselova; Laurent Crenier
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.595

7.  Practical Considerations for Initiating and Utilizing Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Carol H Wysham; Davida F Kruger
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2021-04-09

8.  Efficacy and safety of flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Castellana; Claudia Parisi; Sergio Di Molfetta; Ludovico Di Gioia; Annalisa Natalicchio; Sebastio Perrini; Angelo Cignarelli; Luigi Laviola; Francesco Giorgino
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-06

9.  Acceptability of the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System: The Experience of Young Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Ayman A Al Hayek; Asirvatham A Robert; Mohamed A Al Dawish
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2020-03-16

10.  Metabolic Control of the FreeStyle Libre System in the Pediatric Population with Type 1 Diabetes Dependent on Sensor Adherence.

Authors:  Isabel Leiva-Gea; Maria F Martos-Lirio; Ana Gómez-Perea; Ana-Belen Ariza-Jiménez; Leopoldo Tapia-Ceballos; Jose Manuel Jiménez-Hinojosa; Juan Pedro Lopez-Siguero
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.