OBJECTIVE: We examined quality measures for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) among participants of the California Lupus Epidemiology Study across 25 different clinical sites to identify gaps in quality of care. METHODS: Data from 250 participants with lupus were analyzed across 3 sources (medical records, physician examination, and patient interviews). Overall performance on 8 quality measures was calculated separately for participants with and without LN. We used generalized estimating equations in which the outcome was performance on measures, adjusting for participant demographics, lupus disease severity, and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Of 148 patients without LN, 42% underwent screening laboratory tests for nephritis, 38% underwent lupus activity serum studies, and 81% had their blood pressure checked every 6 months. Of 102 LN patients, 67% had a timely kidney biopsy, at least 81% had appropriate treatment, and 78% achieved target blood pressure within 1 year of diagnosis. Overall performance in participants across quality measures was 54% (no LN) and 80% (LN). Significantly higher overall performance for screening measures for LN was seen at academic (63.4-73%) versus community clinics (37.9-38.4%). Similarly, among those with LN, higher performance in academic (84.1-85.2%) versus community clinics (54.8-60.2%) was observed for treatment measures. CONCLUSION: In this quality-of-care analysis across 25 diverse clinical settings, we found relatively high performance on measures for management of LN. However, future work should focus on bridging the gaps in lupus quality of care for patients without nephritis, particularly in community settings.
OBJECTIVE: We examined quality measures for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) among participants of the California Lupus Epidemiology Study across 25 different clinical sites to identify gaps in quality of care. METHODS: Data from 250 participants with lupus were analyzed across 3 sources (medical records, physician examination, and patient interviews). Overall performance on 8 quality measures was calculated separately for participants with and without LN. We used generalized estimating equations in which the outcome was performance on measures, adjusting for participant demographics, lupus disease severity, and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Of 148 patients without LN, 42% underwent screening laboratory tests for nephritis, 38% underwent lupus activity serum studies, and 81% had their blood pressure checked every 6 months. Of 102 LN patients, 67% had a timely kidney biopsy, at least 81% had appropriate treatment, and 78% achieved target blood pressure within 1 year of diagnosis. Overall performance in participants across quality measures was 54% (no LN) and 80% (LN). Significantly higher overall performance for screening measures for LN was seen at academic (63.4-73%) versus community clinics (37.9-38.4%). Similarly, among those with LN, higher performance in academic (84.1-85.2%) versus community clinics (54.8-60.2%) was observed for treatment measures. CONCLUSION: In this quality-of-care analysis across 25 diverse clinical settings, we found relatively high performance on measures for management of LN. However, future work should focus on bridging the gaps in lupus quality of care for patients without nephritis, particularly in community settings.
Authors: Bevra H Hahn; Maureen A McMahon; Alan Wilkinson; W Dean Wallace; David I Daikh; John D Fitzgerald; George A Karpouzas; Joan T Merrill; Daniel J Wallace; Jinoos Yazdany; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Karandeep Singh; Mazdak Khalighi; Soo-In Choi; Maneesh Gogia; Suzanne Kafaja; Mohammad Kamgar; Christine Lau; William J Martin; Sefali Parikh; Justin Peng; Anjay Rastogi; Weiling Chen; Jennifer M Grossman Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jinoos Yazdany; Candace H Feldman; Jun Liu; Michael M Ward; Michael A Fischer; Karen H Costenbader Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Kristina L Demas; Brendan T Keenan; Daniel H Solomon; Jinoos Yazdany; Karen H Costenbader Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Maria Dall'Era; Miriam G Cisternas; Kurt Snipes; Lisa J Herrinton; Caroline Gordon; Charles G Helmick Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2017-09-10 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Jinoos Yazdany; Laura Trupin; Chris Tonner; R Adams Dudley; Joann Zell; Pantelis Panopalis; Gabriela Schmajuk; Laura Julian; Patricia Katz; Lindsey A Criswell; Edward Yelin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ghalib A Bello; Michael A Brown; Jennifer A Kelly; Aikaterini Thanou; Judith A James; Courtney G Montgomery Journal: Lupus Sci Med Date: 2016-03-10
Authors: Sidha Sreedharan; Ning Li; Geoff Littlejohn; Russell Buchanan; Mandana Nikpour; Eric Morand; Alberta Hoi; Vera Golder Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 5.606