| Literature DB >> 31058183 |
Deepak Rajmohan1, Danielle Bellmer2.
Abstract
Spirulina (blue-green algae) is one of the cheapest sources of protein and essential vitamins. However, bitterness and bad flavor of spirulina protein may limit its use in food products. In this study, spirulina was encapsulated using ionic gelation to facilitate protein delivery. The objective was to study the effects of different types of gelation methods on particle size, texture, morphology, and crude protein content of the beads. Spirulina protein was encapsulated in alginate using both internal and external gelation methods and varying concentrations of sodium alginate and calcium chloride. A total of six different treatments were evaluated, and characterization of the beads included crude protein content, hardness measured using a texture analyzer, and thickness and width of the beads. The morphology was also studied using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results from the texture analysis show that the hardness of the external gelation beads is three times that of the internal gelation beads, and an increase in the alginate percentage in both gelation methods increased the firmness of the beads. The crude protein content was significantly higher with the beads formed using external gelation than with internal gelation. The SEM micrographs also show that the surface morphology of the beads produced with internal gelation has a more heterogeneous structure. Overall, the beads formed with external gelation were superior to those formed with internal gelation methods. Results from this study suggest that alginate is suitable for encapsulation of spirulina protein and these hydrogel beads could be used to enhance the protein delivery and facilitate the design of foods with alternative sources of protein.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31058183 PMCID: PMC6463590 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7101279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
Figure 1Bead formation using the external gelation process.
Dependent variables and number of observations for statistical analysis.
| Dependent Variable | Number of Observations (n) |
|---|---|
| Thickness (mm) | 60 (6 treatments |
| Length (mm) | 60 (6 treatments |
| Hardness (g) | 180 (6 treatments |
| Protein Content (%) | 18 (6 treatments |
Mean length and thickness of spirulina-alginate beads.
| Gelation | Sodium Alginate % | Calcium Chloride % | Thickness (mm) | Length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| External | 1% | 10% | 1.40 ± 0.09c | 2.11 ± 0.25c |
| 1% | 15% | 1.58 ± 0.09cb | 2.08 ± 0.16c | |
| 7% | 10% | 2.48 ± 0.09a | 4.77 ± 0.30a | |
| 7% | 15% | 2.39 ± 0.017a | 4.48 ± 0.25a | |
| Internal | 0.50% | 2% | 1.42 ± 0.12c | 3.03 ± 0.23b |
| 1.50% | 2% | 1.68 ± 0.23b | 2.98 ± 0.28b |
Data reported is mean ± standard deviation (n=10). Values for each treatment with different letters are significantly different (α = 0.05).
Figure 2SEM micrographs showing the cross-sectional morphology of spirulina-alginate beads at 50x magnification made with (a) EG: alginate 1%, CaCl2 10%, (b) EG: alginate 1%, CaCl2 15%, (c) EG: alginate 7%, CaCl2 10%, (d) EG: alginate 7%, CaCl2 15%, (e) IG: alginate 0.5%, CaCl2 2%, and (f) IG: alginate 1.5%, CaCl2 2%.
Figure 3Hardness of spirulina-alginate beads for different formulations. Error bars represent ±S.D (n = 30). The bars with different letters are significantly different (α =0.05).
Figure 4Crude protein content of spirulina-alginate beads for different formulations. Error bars represent ±S.D (n= 3). The bars with different letters are significantly different (α =0.05).