| Literature DB >> 31057769 |
Abraham Colin-Molina1, Marcus J Jellen2, Eduardo García-Quezada1, Miguel Eduardo Cifuentes-Quintal3, Fernando Murillo3, Jorge Barroso3, Salvador Pérez-Estrada4, Rubén A Toscano1, Gabriel Merino3, Braulio Rodríguez-Molina1.
Abstract
Herein we report two crystalline molecular rotors 1 and 4 that show extremely narrow signals in deuterium solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Although this line shape is typically associated with fast-moving molecular components, our VT 2H NMR experiments, along with X-ray diffraction analyses and periodic DFT computations show that this spectroscopic feature can also be originated from low-frequency intramolecular rotations of the central phenylene with a cone angle of 54.7° that is attained by the cooperative motion of the entire structure that distorts the molecular axis to rotation. In contrast, two isomeric structures (2 and 3) do not show a noticeable intramolecular rotation, because their crystallographic arrays showed very restricting close contacts. Our findings clearly indicate that the multiple components and phase transitions in crystalline molecular machines can work in concert to achieve the desired motion.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31057769 PMCID: PMC6482440 DOI: 10.1039/c8sc04398a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 1Molecular rotors 1–4 reported here with dibrominated carbazole stators.
Scheme 1Synthesis of rotors 1–4 and deuterated analogues, see the ESI† for the synthesis of the precursors.
Fig. 2(a) Supramolecular interactions of the molecular rotor 1 and (b) interactions of the solvate of rotor 4. Both rotors show a sharp deuterium signal at high temperatures.
Fig. 3Comparison of the powder X-ray diffraction diffractograms of compound 4, (a) calculated data starting from the solvent-free structure, (b) experimental data obtained from crystals kept at room temperature over three days, (c) experimental data obtained by heating the sample above 165 °C, see details in the main text.
Fig. 4Experimental 2H NMR line shapes of (a) compound 1 and (b) compound 4 at the indicated temperatures.
Fig. 5Rotational barriers for compounds 1 and 4. (a) Rigid model; (b) relaxed model.
Fig. 6(a) Comparison of the experimental and calculated 2H line shapes, (b) distortion of the molecular axis, (c) representation of the asymmetric rotational potential and (d) Arrhenius plot with resulting activation parameters.