Literature DB >> 31057684

Development of Predictive Models in Patients with Epiphora Using Lacrimal Scintigraphy and Machine Learning.

Yong-Jin Park1, Ji Hoon Bae1, Mu Heon Shin1, Seung Hyup Hyun1, Young Seok Cho1, Yearn Seong Choe1, Joon Young Choi1, Kyung-Han Lee1, Byung-Tae Kim1, Seung Hwan Moon1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We developed predictive models using different programming languages and different computing platforms for machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) that classify clinical diagnoses in patients with epiphora. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of these models.
METHODS: Between January 2016 and September 2017, 250 patients with epiphora who underwent dacryocystography (DCG) and lacrimal scintigraphy (LS) were included in the study. We developed five different predictive models using ML tools, Python-based TensorFlow, R, and Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio (MAMLS). A total of 27 clinical characteristics and parameters including variables related to epiphora (VE) and variables related to dacryocystography (VDCG) were used as input data. Apart from this, we developed two predictive convolutional neural network (CNN) models for diagnosing LS images. We conducted this study using supervised learning.
RESULTS: Among 500 eyes of 250 patients, 59 eyes had anatomical obstruction, 338 eyes had functional obstruction, and the remaining 103 eyes were normal. For the data set that excluded VE and VDCG, the test accuracies in Python-based TensorFlow, R, multiclass logistic regression in MAMLS, multiclass neural network in MAMLS, and nuclear medicine physician were 81.70%, 80.60%, 81.70%, 73.10%, and 80.60%, respectively. The test accuracies of CNN models in three-class classification diagnosis and binary classification diagnosis were 72.00% and 77.42%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: ML-based predictive models using different programming languages and different computing platforms were useful for classifying clinical diagnoses in patients with epiphora and were similar to a clinician's diagnostic ability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convolutional neural network; Dacryocystography; Deep learning; Epiphora; Lacrimal scintigraphy; Machine learning

Year:  2019        PMID: 31057684      PMCID: PMC6473022          DOI: 10.1007/s13139-019-00574-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1869-3474


  20 in total

1.  Assessment of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction--a survey of ophthalmologists in the southwest.

Authors:  F M Cuthbertson; S Webber
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  The value of lacrimal scintillography in the assessment of patients with epiphora.

Authors:  O A Vonica; E Obi; Z Sipkova; C Soare; A R Pearson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Machine learning-based kinetic modeling: a robust and reproducible solution for quantitative analysis of dynamic PET data.

Authors:  Leyun Pan; Caixia Cheng; Uwe Haberkorn; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Comparing humans and deep learning performance for grading AMD: A study in using universal deep features and transfer learning for automated AMD analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Burlina; Katia D Pacheco; Neil Joshi; David E Freund; Neil M Bressler
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 5.  Lacrimal scintigraphy: "interpretation more art than science".

Authors:  Suresh Sagili; Dinesh Selva; Raman Malhotra
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2012-04

6.  The Dropout Learning Algorithm.

Authors:  Pierre Baldi; Peter Sadowski
Journal:  Artif Intell       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 9.088

Review 7.  A Review of Feature Selection and Feature Extraction Methods Applied on Microarray Data.

Authors:  Zena M Hira; Duncan F Gillies
Journal:  Adv Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-11

8.  Regularized machine learning in the genetic prediction of complex traits.

Authors:  Sebastian Okser; Tapio Pahikkala; Antti Airola; Tapio Salakoski; Samuli Ripatti; Tero Aittokallio
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms Can Classify Open-Text Feedback of Doctor Performance With Human-Level Accuracy.

Authors:  Chris Gibbons; Suzanne Richards; Jose Maria Valderas; John Campbell
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Predicting sample size required for classification performance.

Authors:  Rosa L Figueroa; Qing Zeng-Treitler; Sasikiran Kandula; Long H Ngo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.