| Literature DB >> 31057607 |
Kennedy Diema Konlan1, Milipaak Japiong2, Kennedy Dodam Konlan3, Agani Afaya2, Solomon Mohammed Salia2, Joseph M Kombat4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Ghana, attempts to control malaria through antimalarial medications are currently threatened by the emergence and spread of drug resistant malaria parasites. This, together with the increasing incidence of malaria, has heightened the need for a more effective method of controlling the spread. The use of Insecticide Treated Bed Net (ITN) has been recognised as an effective measure in the prevention of malaria. OBJECTIVE/Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31057607 PMCID: PMC6463554 DOI: 10.1155/2019/3693450
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis ISSN: 1687-708X
Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents.
| Variables | Attributes | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Age | 17-25 | 51 | 18.0 |
| 26-35 | 128 | 45.2 | |
| 36+ | 104 | 36.7 | |
|
| |||
| Educational level | None | 36 | 12.7 |
| Primary | 30 | 10.6 | |
| JHS | 66 | 23.3 | |
| SHS | 50 | 17.7 | |
| Tertiary | 101 | 35.7 | |
|
| |||
| Marital status | Never married | 67 | 23.7 |
| Co-habiting | 9 | 3.2 | |
| Married | 182 | 64.3 | |
| Separated | 22 | 7.8 | |
| Divorced | 3 | 1.1 | |
|
| |||
| Religion | Christian | 262 | 92.6 |
| Muslim | 19 | 6.7 | |
| Other | 2 | 0.7 | |
Factors associated with ITN utilization.
| Variables | Frequency [N=260] N(%) | COR (95%) p-value | AOR(95%) p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age distribution | 17-25 | Ref. | ||
| 26-35 | 49(32.3) | 0.51(0.27,0.98)0.045 | 2.00(0.00,0.02)<0.001 | |
| 36 and above | 41(39.4) | 0.54(0.28,1.06)0.071 | ||
|
| ||||
| Education status | None | Ref. | ||
| JHS | 32(48.5) | 0.54(0.24,1.25)0.149 | 1.16(0.91,1.49)0.240 | |
| Primary | 20(66.7) | 2.07(0.86,5.02)0.106 | ||
| SHS | 23(46.0) | 0.91(0.44,1.88)0.794 | ||
| Tertiary | 31(30.7) | 0.47(0.25,0.90)0.022 | ||
|
| ||||
| Employment status | Unemployed | Ref. | ||
| Employed | 102(39.7) | 0.42(0.19,0.95)0.036 | 1.51(0.47,4.92)0.490 | |
|
| ||||
| Marital status | Co-habiting | Ref. | ||
| Married | 70(38.5) | 11.91(0.68,207.78)0.090 | 5.50(0.15,200.76)0.353 | |
| Separated | 18(81.82) | 78.11(3.79,1608.07)0.005 | 4.96(0.60,41.24)0.139 | |
| Single | 30(44.8) | 15.45(0.86,276.31)0.063 | 0.60(0.47,7.69)0.698 | |
|
| ||||
| Religion | Christian | Ref. | ||
| Moslem | 4(21.0) | 0.38(0.13,1.11)0.076 | 0.43(0.13,1.44)0.173 | |
|
| ||||
| Awareness of ITN use | No | Ref. | ||
| Yes | 278(98.2) | 10.50(3.87,28.54)<0.001 | 0.41(0.13,1.23)0.118 | |
|
| ||||
| Household size | 1-4 | Ref. | ||
| 5-10 | 11(35.5) | 0.76(0.36,1.63)0.480 | 1.82(0.44,7.44)0.402 | |
|
| ||||
| Awareness of ITN side effects | No | Ref. | ||
| Yes | 64(33.7) | 0.37(0.22,0.61)<0.001 | 0.51(0.19,1.37)0.180 | |
|
| ||||
| ITN too costly | No | Ref. | ||
| Yes | 25(36.8) | 0.77(0.44,1.34)0.354 | 1.34(0.50,3.60)0.552 | |