| Literature DB >> 31057592 |
Władysław Polcyn1, Ewelina Paluch-Lubawa1, Teresa Lehmann1, Robert Mikuła2.
Abstract
Under fertilizationpan> levels specific to intensive farming, the impact of compensationpan> of soil nutritionpan>al value by arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) might be limited. Therefore, the questionpan> arises whEntities:
Keywords: Rhizophagus irregularis; Zea mays; arbuscular mycorrhiza; drought tolerance; fertilization limits; senescence reversal
Year: 2019 PMID: 31057592 PMCID: PMC6478757 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Effect of mycorrizae and fertilization level0 on nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) accumulation in leaves at three vertical canopy positions. P and N content of non-mycorrhized (NM) and mycorrhized (AM) plants, grown at four fertilization levels (0.125xD, 0.25xD, 0.5xD, 1xD). The data represent averaged values (n = 4), taken as mixed samples from two adjacent leaves (joined leaf numbers: L2+3, L4+5, and L6+7), representing four plants for each fertilization and symbiotic variant The measurements were made at the time of tasseling (10 weeks after sowing), after 4 weeks fertilization with one of four fertilizer dilution. The minerals content was expressed as weight units per leaf dry mass (g 100g-1). Asterisks represent statistical significance between NM and NM means according to t-Student test at p < 0.05.
FIGURE 3Correlation between the Nitrogen Balance Index (NBI) and the nitrogen content of the middle leaves. NM, non-mycorrhized plants; AM, mycorrhized plants. Data was collected for analysis (n = 32) from four fertilization variants (1xD, 0.5xD, 0.25xD, 0.125xD). Both nitrogen content (expressed as weight units per leaf dry mass) and NBI measurements were done on the same plants and leaves (L4 + 5, ear leaf and leaf above the ear). Pearson’s correlation coefficient (value R2) significant at the level of 0.01% (p < 0.0001).
FIGURE 2Long-term intraradical hyphae vitality under different fertilization and drought regimes. (A) Fertilizer or drought effect on hyphal root colonization and arbuscules abundance. F% – frequency of fungal structures in the root system, M% – intensity of the mycorrhizal colonization, a% – arbuscular abundance in colonized parts of root fragments, after 6 weeks on 0.25xD fertilizer dilution and additional 4 weeks on fertilization levels annotated in the table (10th week after sowing). Drought impact was examined after additional 2 weeks of drought and 1 week-long recovery; (B) Developmental stages and hyphae vitality. 1: non mycorrhized control roots, 2 and 3: acceleration of arbuscules development between 6th and 8th week of growth on 0.25xD fertilization level, 4: vesicles abundance after additional 4 weeks on 1xD dose, 5: sporulation level at the time of silage harvest (20th week after sowing); (C) Effect of fertilizer dose on AM vesicles abundance, after 6 weeks on 0.25xD fertilizer dilution and additional 4 weeks on fertilization levels annotated in the table (10th week after sowing); (D) Effect of drought and recovery on AM vesicles abundance, after 6 weeks on 0.25xD fertilizer dilution and additional 4 weeks on 1xD fertilization levels annotated in the table (10th week after sowing). Different letters symbolize statistically significant difference between means according to non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance (p < 0.0001) followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (p < 0.01). The error bars show the standard error of the mean values (n = 300–400).
FIGURE 4Effect of increasing fertilization on nitrogen status (A) and PSII quantum conversion (B) of the middle leaves, as indicators of nutritional status of NM and AM plants. Rfd, chlorophyll fluorescence decrease ratio; Fv/Fm, maximum quantum yield of PSII in the dark-adapted state. The bars represent average values taken from middle leaves (L4 + 5, ear leaf and leaf above) at the time of tasseling (10 weeks after sowing), after 4 weeks fertilization with one of 4 dilutions of maximal (1xD) dose. The error bars show the standard error of the mean (n = 80 for NBI, Chl and Flv: 4 plants × 2 leaves × 10 sampling points covering upper half of leaf length, n = 8 for Rfd, Fv/Fm: 4 plants × 2 leaves). Asterisks show statistically significant difference between NM and NM means according to t-Student test ( 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
Effect of mycorrizae and fertilization level on light-saturated photosynthetic efficiency of the middle leaves.
| Fertilization | NM | AM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amax | 0.5xD | 16.9 | ±3.6 | 19.4 | ±2.9 |
| 1xD | 32.2 | ±7.2 | 30.5 | ±6.1 | |
| gs | 0.5xD | 0.11 | ±0.03 | 0.15 | ±0.03 |
| 1xD | 0.22 | ±0.06 | 0.29 | ±0.06 | |
| PNUE | 0.5xD | 10.6 | ±0.64 | 11.2 | ±0.46 |
| 1xD | 19.9 | ±0.69 | 17.7 | ±0.54 | |
| PPUE | 0.5xD | 76.1 | ±16 | 88.2 | ±13 |
| 1xD | 161 | ±36 | 154 | ±31 | |
FIGURE 5Effect of progressive drought and recovery on leaf nitrogen (A) and water (B) status, PSII quantum conversion (C) and light-saturated photosynthetic efficiency (D). Rfd, chlorophyll fluorescence decrease ratio; Amax, light-saturated photosynthetic rate; gs, maximum stomatal conductance to H2O. Non-mycorrhized (NM) and mycorrhized (AM) plants were evaluated during full hydration (S0), drought conditions (S9, S11, S13) and rehydration (R3, R4, R5). The bars represent average values taken from combined measurements from the middle leaves (L4 + 5, ear leaf and leaf above); n = 100 for NBI, Chl and Flv: 5 plants × 2 leaves × 10 sampling points covering upper half of leaf length; n = 8 for Rfd, Amax, gs: 4 plants × 2 leaves. Asterisks show statistically significant difference between NM and NM means according to t-Student test ( 0.05, 0.01, < 0.001).
FIGURE 6Leaf nitrogen status (A), chlorophyll (B) and flavonoids (C) level and leaf area (D) at 8 leaf positions after 2-week drought imposed at silking time (10 weeks after sowing, fertilized with 1xD dose) and 7 days of rehydratation. The error bars show the standard error of the mean (n = 60 for NBI, Chl and Flv: 6 plants × 10 sampling points covering upper half of leaf length, n = 6 for leaf area measurements). Asterisks show statistically significant difference between NM and AM means according to t-Student test ( 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001).