| Literature DB >> 31057498 |
Xiaojie Hu1, Fuxing Kang1, Bing Yang1, Wei Zhang2, Chao Qin1, Yanzheng Gao1.
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance genes (class="Chemical">ARGs) iclass="Chemical">n bacteria are emergiclass="Chemical">ng coclass="Chemical">ntamiclass="Chemical">naclass="Chemical">nts as their proliferatioclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">n the eclass="Chemical">nviroclass="Chemical">nmeclass="Chemical">nt poses sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt threats toEntities:
Keywords: antibiotic resistance genes; binding; cell permeability; extracellular polymeric substances; lateral gene transfer; model computation; transformation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31057498 PMCID: PMC6479211 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Lateral transfer of pUC19 plasmid into Ca2+-induced competent E. coli cells with extracellular polymeric substances (EPS; circles) or without EPS (triangles) at pH 7.0. (A) Brief introduction of experimental procedures. (B) Number of transformants for the lateral transfer of pUC19 into E. coli DH5α. (C) Number of transformants for lateral transfer of pUC19 into E. coli XL1 Blue. (D) Transformation efficiency for lateral transfer of pUC19 into E. coli DH5α. Transformation efficiency was calculated as transformants per microgram of plasmids. (E) Transformation efficiency for lateral transfer of pUC19 into E. coli XL1 Blue. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates.
FIGURE 2Cell permeability of E. coli DH5α (A,B) and E. coli XL1 Blue (C,D) with EPS (blue) or without EPS (red) at pH 7.0 and 30-min incubation time in the absence of Ca2+ (A,C) and in the presence of Ca2+ (B,D).
FIGURE 3Binding between plasmids and EPS in the presence or absence of Ca2+ probed by fluorescence quenching at 25°C and pH 7.0. Stern–Volmer plots for E. coli DH5α (A) and E. coli XL1 Blue (C). Plots of log [(F0 -F)/F] vs. log [Q] for E. coli DH5α (B) and E. coli XL1 Blue (D). (E) Correlation between LGT enhancement percentage (%) due to the EPS removal and association constants (LogKA) between plasmids and EPS in the presence of Ca2+. The data for DH5α + pSHG298, DH5α + pSHG396, XL1 Blue + pSHG298, and XL1 Blue + pSHG396 are shown in the Supplementary Information.
FIGURE 4Binding sites of EPS with plasmid DNA in the absence or presence of Ca2+ at pH 7.0 and 25°C. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of C, N, and O of EPS before and after reaction with plasmids in the absence or presence of Ca2+, and XPS analysis of Ca in CaCl2, Ca2+–EPS, and Ca2+–EPS–DNA, for E. coli DH5α (A) and E. coli XL1 Blue (B).
FIGURE 5Model computation of the interaction of the –POO– group of DNA with amino acids (representing proteins in EPS; A–J) or with monosaccharides (representing polysaccharides in EPS; K–T), in the presence of Ca2+. (A,C,E,G,I,K,M,O,Q,S) Plots of the reduced density gradient versus the electron density multiplied by the sign of the second Hessian eigenvalues. (B,D,F,H,J,L,N,P,R,T) Gradient isosurfaces. A and B were for the glutamine; C and D were for the serine; E and F were for the threonine; G and H were for the tryptophan; I and J were for the tyrosine; K and L were for the glucose; M and N were for the rhamnose; O and P were for the galactose; Q and R were for the mannose; S and T were for the fructose. Atoms C, O, N, P, and H were labeled by green, red, blue, brown, and white, respectively. Solvent was taken into consideration.