| Literature DB >> 31057267 |
Balakrishnan Nirmal1, Belavendra Antonisamy2, C V Dincy Peter1, Leni George1, Anu A George1, Gauri M Dinesh1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stability in vitiligo is an important concept in guiding patient management and a vital prerequisite before vitiligo surgery. Disease activity of vitiligo based on patient's history is imprecise. It is practically impossible to perform biopsy from all lesions of vitiligo to ascertain stability. Dermatoscopy can be used to examine all clinical lesions in a patient of vitiligo. There is a need to validate many reported dermatoscopic findings for universal use. AIMS: To analyze the significance of dermatoscopic findings in the activity of vitiligo and to devise a cutoff score for stable vitiligo.Entities:
Keywords: Dermatoscopy; stability; vitiligo
Year: 2019 PMID: 31057267 PMCID: PMC6484572 DOI: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_75_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cutan Aesthet Surg ISSN: 0974-2077
Figure 1Border. (A) Sharp. (B) Ill-defined. (C) Trichrome
Figure 2Pigment network within the vitiligo lesion. (A) Absent. (B) Reticular. (C) Reduced. (D) Reverse
Figure 3(A) Perilesional hyperpigmentation. (B) Perifollicular pigmentation. (C) Satellite lesions. (D) Micro-Koebner phenomenon
Scoring for stability in vitiligo: BPLeFoSK criteria
| 1. | +1 | |
| 2. | +1 | |
| 3. | Peri | +1 |
| 4. | Peri | +1 |
| 5. | –1.5 | |
| 6. | Micro-Koebner phenomenon | –2 |
Assessment of the six dermatoscopic parameters of stability of vitiligo
| 1. | Border (sharp) | 94.1% | 100% | 100% | 95.5% | - | 0.254 | - |
| 2. | Pigment network (absent/reticulate) | 92.9% | 96.8% | 96% | 94.3% | 21.8 | 0.3 | 181 |
| 3. | Perilesional hyperpigmentation | 89.2% | 85.4% | 84% | 90.2% | 5.15 | 0.443 | 29.1 |
| 4. | Perifollicular pigmentation | 66.5% | 81.4% | 73.6% | 75.6% | 2.63 | 1.13 | 5.01 |
| 5. | Absence of satellite lesion | 99.6% | 34% | 60.8% | 98.6% | 1.43 | 0.618 | - |
| 6. | Absence of micro-Koebner | 100% | 11.9% | 55.9% | 100% | 1.1 | - | - |
PPV = positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value, LR = likelihood ratio
LR value of 1 indicates that the tests provide no additional information and LR above or below 1 increases or decrease the likelihood of stable vitiligo, respectively.
Figure 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: Area under ROC curve = 0.95 (95% CI = 0.90–0.99)
Cutoff point assessment for stability
| ≥ –3.5 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 45.80% |
| ≥ –1.5 | 100.00% | 4.23% | 48.09% |
| ≥ –0.5 | 100.00% | 11.27% | 51.91% |
| ≥0 | 98.33% | 19.72% | 55.73% |
| ≥0.5 | 93.33% | 66.20% | 78.63% |
| ≥1 | 93.33% | 69.01% | 80.15% |
| ≥1.5 | 90.00% | 94.37% | 92.37% |
| ≥2 | 88.33% | 94.37% | 91.60% |
| ≥3 | 75.00% | 100.00% | 88.55% |
| ≥4 | 16.67% | 100.00% | 61.83% |
| >4 | 0.00% | 100.00% | 54.20% |