| Literature DB >> 31057206 |
Uduak-Obong Morgan Morgan1, Etiobong Akpan Etukumana1, Festus Abasiubong2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the last few decades, the evaluation of the quality of life (QoL) among older adults has become increasingly important in health as well as in social sciences. There has been growing emphasis on the need to understand what influences older people's QoL as it is argued to be of greater value than the traditional outcome measures, such as health status. AIM ANDEntities:
Keywords: Elderly; Uyo; hospital; quality of life
Year: 2017 PMID: 31057206 PMCID: PMC6496980 DOI: 10.4103/nmj.NMJ_124_17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Niger Med J ISSN: 0300-1652
Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents
| Characteristics | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | 133 (42.9) |
| Female | 177 (57.1) |
| Total | 310 (100) |
| Educational level | |
| No formal education | 78 (25.2) |
| Primary education | 130 (41.9) |
| Secondary education | 22 (7.1) |
| Postsecondary education | 80 (25.8) |
| Total | 310 (100) |
| Income source | |
| None | 136 (43.9) |
| Pension | 102 (32.9) |
| Trading | 36 (11.6) |
| Gifts | 14 (4.5) |
| Salary | 18 (5.8) |
| Farming | 2 (0.6) |
| Driving | 1 (0.3) |
| Carpentry | 1 (0.3) |
| Total | 310 (100) |
| Marital status | |
| Single | 6 (1.9) |
| Married | 161 (51.9) |
| Divorced | 6 (1.9) |
| Widowed | 137 (44.3) |
| Total | 310 (100) |
| Average income grade | |
| No income | 136 (43.9) |
| <₦50,000 | 128 (41.3) |
| ₦50,000 <₦100,000 | 29 (9.3) |
| >₦100,000 | 17 (5.5) |
| Total | 310 (100) |
| Religion | |
| Christianity | 310 (100) |
| Islam | 0 |
| Others | 0 |
| Tribe | |
| Ibibio | 224 (72.2) |
| Annang | 61 (19.7) |
| Oron | 13 (4.2) |
| Igbo | 9 (2.9) |
| Others | 3 (1.0) |
| Total | 310 (100) |
| Type of settlement | |
| Rural | 184 (59.4) |
| Urban | 126 (40.6) |
| Total | 310 (100) |
| Social class | |
| 1 | 35 (12.3) |
| 2 | 32 (10.3) |
| 3 | 44 (14.2) |
| 4 | 102 (32.9) |
| 5 | 97 (31.3) |
| Total | 310 (100) |
Quality of life of respondents
| Characteristics | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|
| QoL | |
| Good | 265 (85.5) |
| Poor | 45 (14.5) |
| Total | 310 (100) |
QoL – Quality of life
Association between sociodemographic factors and quality of life of respondents
| Variables | QoL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | Poor | |||
| Age | ||||
| 60-69 | 166 (89.4) | 24 (12.6) | 2.681 | 0.444 |
| 70-79 | 85 (83.3) | 17 (16.7) | ||
| 80-89 | 12 (75.0) | 4 (25.0) | ||
| 90-99 | 2 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 115 (86.5) | 18 (13.5) | 0.181 | 0.670 |
| Female | 150 (84.7) | 27 (15.3) | ||
| Educational level | ||||
| No formal | 57 (73.1) | 21 (26.9) | 16.342 | 0.001* |
| Primary | 114 (87.7) | 16 (12.3) | ||
| Secondary | 18 (81.8) | 4 (18.2) | ||
| Postsecondary | 76 (95.0) | 4 (5.0) | ||
| Income grade | ||||
| <N50,000 | 109 (85.2) | 19 (14.8) | 7.943 | 0.019* |
| N50,000-<N100,000 | 28 (96.6) | 1 (3.4) | ||
| >100,000.00 | 17 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Social class | ||||
| 1 | 33 (94.3) | 2 (5.7) | 10.267 | 0.036* |
| 2 | 29 (90.6) | 3 (9.4) | ||
| 3 | 39 (88.6) | 5 (11.4) | ||
| 4 | 90 (88.2) | 12 (11.8) | ||
| 5 | 74 (76.3) | 23 (23.7) | ||
| Settlement | ||||
| Urban | 112 (88.9) | 14 (11.1) | 1.983 | 0.159 |
| Rural | 153 (83.1) | 31 (16.9) | ||
| Marital status | ||||
| Single | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | 4.356 | 0.226 |
| Married | 142 (88.2) | 19 (11.8) | ||
| Divorced | 6 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Widowed | 112 (81.8) | 25 (18.2) | ||
| Chronic medical illness | ||||
| Yes | 127 (84.1) | 24 (15.9) | 0.450 | 0.520 |
| No | 138 (86.8) | 21 (13.3) | ||
*Significant P value. QoL – Quality of life