| Literature DB >> 31056796 |
Tanjala T Gipson1,2, Andrea Poretti3, Sarah A Kelley4, Kathryn A Carson5,6, Michael V Johnston7, Thierry A G M Huisman2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Tuberous sclerosis complex; autism; behavior; diffusion tensor imaging; intellectual disability; self-injurious behavior
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31056796 PMCID: PMC6618151 DOI: 10.1111/jon.12628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroimaging ISSN: 1051-2284 Impact factor: 2.486
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with TSC with and without Self‐Injurious Behavior
| TSC with SIB | TSC without SIB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic |
|
|
|
| Sex, | .31 | ||
| Male | 5 (83) | 5 (50) | |
| Female | 1 (17) | 5 (50) | |
| Mean (SD) age at MRI, years | 9.0 (4.0) | 8.8 (5.0) | .94 |
| Range (min, max), years | 4.1, 14.5 | 2.1, 17.5 | |
| Cognitive development, | .03 | ||
| Delayed | 6 (100) | 4 (40) | |
| Typical | 0 (0) | 6 (60) | |
| Genetic mutation, | .18 | ||
| TSC1/truncating | 0 (0) | 1 (10) | |
| TSC1/frameshift | 1 (17) | 0 (0) | |
| TSC2/truncating | 1 (17) | 0 (0) | |
| TSC2/frameshift | 0 (0) | 1 (10) | |
| TSC2/missense | 1 (17) | 0 (0) | |
| TSC2/unknown | 1 (17) | 1 (100) | |
| NT | 2 (33) | 7 (70) |
MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; NT = not tested; SD = standard deviation; SIB = self‐injurious behavior; TSC = tuberous sclerosis complex.
Diffusion Tensor Imaging and MRI Measures for Patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex by Self‐Injurious Behavior Status
| TSC with SIB | TSC without SIB | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region |
|
|
| FDR |
| Globus pallidus right: | ||||
| Number of voxels | 218 (203‐222) | 260 (252‐316) | .008 | .18 |
| FA | .233 (.226‐.246) | .272 (.265‐.277) | .003 | .12 |
| MD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | .839 (.830‐.842) | .828 (.818‐.870) | .79 | 1.0 |
| AD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | 1.060 (1.051‐1.084) | 1.077 (1.049‐1.085) | .55 | 1.0 |
| RD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | .722 (.718‐.727) | .706 (.698‐.765) | .70 | 1.0 |
| Globus pallidus left: | ||||
| Number of voxels | 222 (215‐233) | 274 (248‐288) | .002 | .12 |
| FA | .223 (.203‐.231) | .247 (.238‐.264) | .004 | .12 |
| MD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | .820 (.796‐.831) | .822 (.813‐.832) | .99 | 1.0 |
| AD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | 1.007 (.996‐1.022) | 1.032 (1.004‐1.040) | .14 | 1.0 |
| RD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | .723 (.701‐.741) | .719 (.699‐.731) | .55 | 1.0 |
| Caudate nucleus right: | ||||
| Number of voxels | 712 (619‐814) | 896 (831‐981) | .01 | .26 |
| FA | .163 (.150‐.192) | .184 (.161‐.198) | .21 | 1.0 |
| MD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | .870 (.856‐.892) | .849 (.810‐.885) | .25 | 1.0 |
| AD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | 1.026 (1.017‐1.030) | 1.001 (.951‐1.032) | .30 | 1.0 |
| RD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | .800 (.772‐.825) | .773 (.726‐.800) | .18 | 1.0 |
| Caudate nucleus left: | ||||
| Number of voxels | 702 (655‐841) | 921 (836‐964) | .03 | .44 |
| FA | .162 (.154‐.170) | .186 (.174‐.198) | .03 | .39 |
| MD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | .840 (.828‐.878) | .844 (.799‐.853) | .48 | 1.0 |
| AD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | .993 (.979‐1.028) | .978 (.954‐1.006) | .36 | 1.0 |
| RD (× 10–3 mm/second2) | .765 (.750‐.803) | .769 (.722‐.776) | .48 | 1.0 |
AD = axial diffusivity; FA = fractional anisotropy; FDR = false discovery rate; MD = mean diffusivity; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; RD = radial diffusivity; SIB = self‐injurious behavior; TSC = tuberous sclerosis complex.
Results presented are median and interquartile range, and the P value is from the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Figure 1Box plots of DTI scalars that were significantly different by self‐injurious behavior for the (A) globus pallidus and (B) caudate nucleus.
Note: The middle line in the box represents the median value, the ends of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the whiskers represent the 5th and 95th percentiles.