Literature DB >> 31056718

Comprehensive cardiac phenotyping in large animals: comparison of pressure-volume analysis and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in pig post-myocardial infarction systolic heart failure.

Philip W J Raake1,2, Jens Barthelmes3, Birgit Krautz3, Sebastian Buss3, Regina Huditz3, Philipp Schlegel3, Christophe Weber3, Manfred Stangassinger4, Uwe Haberkorn5, Hugo A Katus3, Patrick Most3, Sven T Pleger3.   

Abstract

Large animal ischemic cardiomyopathy models are widely used for preclinical testing of promising novel therapeutic approaches. Pressure volume (PV) loop analysis and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) allow functional and morphological phenotyping. In this study we performed a comparative analysis of both methods highlighting the strength of each and their synergistic potential. Myocardial infarction (MI) was created in German farm pigs (German Landrace) by 2 h LCX occlusion (n = 11) and subsequent reperfusion. Cardiac function was assessed by PV-loops and CMRI 56 and 112 days post-MI. Two hours occlusion of the LCX led to mid-size left ventricular (LV) MI represented by high-sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) 3 days post-MI, correlating well with cardiac CMRI late enhancement. CMRI determined end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes significantly increased post-MI, while ejection fraction was reduced in infarcted animals compared to the sham group (n = 6). PV-loop derived preload-insensitive parameters of systolic and diastolic function were diminished post-MI compared to sham animals while preload-dependent parameters only deteriorated in advanced HF. PV-loop analysis significantly correlates with CMRI analysis of cardiac function in pig post-MI ischemic cardiomyopathy. PV-Loop analysis accurately quantifies LV volumetry and function in post-MI HF, and thus eccentric LV morphology. PV-loop analysis correlates well to cardiac MRI. Preload-insensitive parameters show high sensitivity to quantify HF while preload-sensitive parameters are not able to quantify early-stages of LV HF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac function; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Heart failure; Ischemic cardiomyopathy; Pig model; Pressure–volume loops

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31056718     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01610-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  18 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of systolic and diastolic ventricular properties via pressure-volume analysis: a guide for clinical, translational, and basic researchers.

Authors:  Daniel Burkhoff; Israel Mirsky; Hiroyuki Suga
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Is magnetic resonance imaging the 'reference standard' for cardiac functional assessment? Factors influencing measurement of left ventricular mass and volumes.

Authors:  H Steen; K Nasir; E Flynn; I El-Shehaby; S Lai; H A Katus; D Bluemcke; J A C Lima
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Clinical practice. Systolic heart failure.

Authors:  John J V McMurray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Troponin T concentrations 72 hours after myocardial infarction as a serological estimate of infarct size.

Authors:  M Licka; R Zimmermann; J Zehelein; T J Dengler; H A Katus; W Kübler
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Quantitative assessment of cardiac output and left ventricular function by noninvasive phase-contrast and cine MRI: validation study with invasive pressure-volume loop analysis in a swine model.

Authors:  Hung-Yu Lin; Darren Freed; Trevor W R Lee; Rakesh C Arora; Ayyaz Ali; Waiel Almoustadi; Bo Xiang; Fei Wang; Stephen Large; Scott B King; Boguslaw Tomanek; Ganghong Tian
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Cardiac AAV9-S100A1 gene therapy rescues post-ischemic heart failure in a preclinical large animal model.

Authors:  Sven T Pleger; Changguang Shan; Jan Ksienzyk; Raffi Bekeredjian; Peter Boekstegers; Rabea Hinkel; Stefanie Schinkel; Barbara Leuchs; Jochen Ludwig; Gang Qiu; Christophe Weber; Philip Raake; Walter J Koch; Hugo A Katus; Oliver J Müller; Patrick Most
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Intracoronary adenovirus encoding adenylyl cyclase VI increases left ventricular function in heart failure.

Authors:  N Chin Lai; David M Roth; Mei Hua Gao; Tong Tang; Nancy Dalton; Yin Yin Lai; Matthew Spellman; Paul Clopton; H Kirk Hammond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Recirculating cardiac delivery of AAV2/1SERCA2a improves myocardial function in an experimental model of heart failure in large animals.

Authors:  M J Byrne; J M Power; A Preovolos; J A Mariani; R J Hajjar; D M Kaye
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 9.  Large animal models of heart failure: a critical link in the translation of basic science to clinical practice.

Authors:  Jennifer A Dixon; Francis G Spinale
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 10.  Targeting myocardial beta-adrenergic receptor signaling and calcium cycling for heart failure gene therapy.

Authors:  Sven T Pleger; Matthieu Boucher; Patrick Most; Walter J Koch
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.712

View more
  1 in total

1.  Left Ventricular Pressure Volume Assessment Using Carotid Artery Access in the Rat.

Authors:  Spyros A Mavropoulos; Kiyotake Ishikawa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.