Pierre-François Laterre1, Gwenhael Colin2, Pierre-François Dequin3, Thierry Dugernier4, Thierry Boulain5, Samareh Azeredo da Silveira6, Frédéric Lajaunias6, Antonio Perez6, Bruno François7. 1. Intensive Care Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: pierre-francois.laterre@uclouvain.be. 2. Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, District Hospital Center, La Roche-sur-Yon, France. 3. Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital, Tours, France. 4. Soins Intensifs, Clinique Saint-Pierre, Ottignies, Belgium. 5. Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital La Source, Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, Orléans, France. 6. Combioxin, Geneva, Switzerland. 7. Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Limoges Dupuytren Hospital, Limoges, France; Inserm CIC-1435, University Hospital Limoges Dupuytren Hospital, Limoges, France; Inserm UMR 1092, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Severe community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. CAL02, a novel antitoxin agent with an unprecedented mode of action, consists of liposomes that capture bacterial toxins known to dysregulate inflammation, cause organ damage, and impede immune defence. We aimed to assess the safety of CAL02 as an add-on therapy to antibiotics. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial was done in ten intensive care units (ICUs) in France and Belgium (but only six units enrolled patients), in patients with severe community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia who required ICU admission and had been identified as being infected with S pneumoniae. We randomly assigned participants in two stages-the first stage randomly assigned six patients (1:1) to either low-dose CAL02 or placebo, and the second stage randomly assigned 18 patients (14:4) to either high-dose CAL02 or placebo, and stratified in four blocks (4:1, 4:1, 3:1, and 3:1), in addition to standard of care. Block randomisation was done with a computer-generated random number list. Participants, investigators, other site study personnel, the sponsor, and the sponsor's designees involved in study management and monitoring were masked to the randomisation list and treatment assignment. Patients were treated with low-dose (4 mg/kg) or high-dose (16 mg/kg) CAL02 or placebo (saline), in addition to standard antibiotic therapy. Two intravenous doses of study treatment were infused, with a 24 h interval, at a concentration of 10 mg/mL, stepwise, over a maximum of 2 h on days 1 and 2. The primary objective of the study was to assess the safety and tolerability of low-dose and high-dose CAL02 in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia treated with standard antibiotic therapy, and the primary analysis was done on the safety population (all patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment). Efficacy was a secondary outcome. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02583373. FINDINGS: Between March 21, 2016, and Jan 13, 2018, we screened 280 patients with community-acquired pneumonia. 19 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, resulting in 13 patients in the CAL02 groups (three assigned to low-dose CAL02 and ten assigned to high-dose CAL02) and six in the placebo group. One patient randomly assigned to placebo was allocated to the wrong treatment group and received high-dose CAL02 instead of placebo. Thus, 14 patients received CAL02 (three received low-dose CAL02 and 11 received high-dose CAL02) and five patients received placebo, constituting the safety population. At baseline, the mean APACHE II score for the total study population was 21·5 (SD 4·9; 95% CI 19·3-23·7) and 11 (58%) of 19 patients had septic shock. Adverse events occurred in 12 (86%) of 14 patients in the CAL02 treatment groups combined and all five (100%) patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred in four (29%) of 14 patients in the CAL02 treatment groups combined and two (40%) of five patients in the placebo group. One non-serious adverse event (mild increase in triglycerides) in a patient in the high-dose CAL02 group was reported as related to study drug. However, analysis of the changes in triglyceride levels in the CAL02 groups compared with the placebo group revealed no correlation with administration of CAL02. No adverse events were linked to local tolerability events. All patients, apart from one who died in the low CAL02 group (death not related to the study drug) achieved clinical cure at the test of cure visit between days 15 and 22. The sequential organ failure assessment score decreased by mean 65·0% (95% CI 50·7-79·4) in the combined CAL02 groups compared with 29·2% (12·8-45·5) in the placebo group between baseline and day 8. INTERPRETATION: The nature of adverse events was consistent with the profile of the study population and CAL02 showed a promising safety profile and tolerability. However, the difference between high-dose and low-dose CAL02 could not be assessed in this study. Efficacy was in line with the expected benefits of neutralising toxins. The results of this study support further clinical development of CAL02 and provide a solid basis for a larger clinical study. FUNDING: Combioxin.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Severe community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. CAL02, a novel antitoxin agent with an unprecedented mode of action, consists of liposomes that capture bacterial toxins known to dysregulate inflammation, cause organ damage, and impede immune defence. We aimed to assess the safety of CAL02 as an add-on therapy to antibiotics. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial was done in ten intensive care units (ICUs) in France and Belgium (but only six units enrolled patients), in patients with severe community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia who required ICU admission and had been identified as being infected with S pneumoniae. We randomly assigned participants in two stages-the first stage randomly assigned six patients (1:1) to either low-dose CAL02 or placebo, and the second stage randomly assigned 18 patients (14:4) to either high-dose CAL02 or placebo, and stratified in four blocks (4:1, 4:1, 3:1, and 3:1), in addition to standard of care. Block randomisation was done with a computer-generated random number list. Participants, investigators, other site study personnel, the sponsor, and the sponsor's designees involved in study management and monitoring were masked to the randomisation list and treatment assignment. Patients were treated with low-dose (4 mg/kg) or high-dose (16 mg/kg) CAL02 or placebo (saline), in addition to standard antibiotic therapy. Two intravenous doses of study treatment were infused, with a 24 h interval, at a concentration of 10 mg/mL, stepwise, over a maximum of 2 h on days 1 and 2. The primary objective of the study was to assess the safety and tolerability of low-dose and high-dose CAL02 in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia treated with standard antibiotic therapy, and the primary analysis was done on the safety population (all patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment). Efficacy was a secondary outcome. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02583373. FINDINGS: Between March 21, 2016, and Jan 13, 2018, we screened 280 patients with community-acquired pneumonia. 19 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, resulting in 13 patients in the CAL02 groups (three assigned to low-dose CAL02 and ten assigned to high-dose CAL02) and six in the placebo group. One patient randomly assigned to placebo was allocated to the wrong treatment group and received high-dose CAL02 instead of placebo. Thus, 14 patients received CAL02 (three received low-dose CAL02 and 11 received high-dose CAL02) and five patients received placebo, constituting the safety population. At baseline, the mean APACHE II score for the total study population was 21·5 (SD 4·9; 95% CI 19·3-23·7) and 11 (58%) of 19 patients had septic shock. Adverse events occurred in 12 (86%) of 14 patients in the CAL02 treatment groups combined and all five (100%) patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred in four (29%) of 14 patients in the CAL02 treatment groups combined and two (40%) of five patients in the placebo group. One non-serious adverse event (mild increase in triglycerides) in a patient in the high-dose CAL02 group was reported as related to study drug. However, analysis of the changes in triglyceride levels in the CAL02 groups compared with the placebo group revealed no correlation with administration of CAL02. No adverse events were linked to local tolerability events. All patients, apart from one who died in the low CAL02 group (death not related to the study drug) achieved clinical cure at the test of cure visit between days 15 and 22. The sequential organ failure assessment score decreased by mean 65·0% (95% CI 50·7-79·4) in the combined CAL02 groups compared with 29·2% (12·8-45·5) in the placebo group between baseline and day 8. INTERPRETATION: The nature of adverse events was consistent with the profile of the study population and CAL02 showed a promising safety profile and tolerability. However, the difference between high-dose and low-dose CAL02 could not be assessed in this study. Efficacy was in line with the expected benefits of neutralising toxins. The results of this study support further clinical development of CAL02 and provide a solid basis for a larger clinical study. FUNDING: Combioxin.
Authors: John H Rex; Holly Fernandez Lynch; I Glenn Cohen; Jonathan J Darrow; Kevin Outterson Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Despoina Koulenti; Elena Xu; Andrew Song; Isaac Yin Sum Mok; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Apostolos Armaganidis; Sotirios Tsiodras; Jeffrey Lipman Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2020-01-30