Gilad Karavani1, Natali Schachter-Safrai2, Ariel Revel3, Talya Mordechai-Daniel3, Dvora Bauman2, Tal Imbar3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. Electronic address: Giladk84@gmail.com. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Fertility Preservation Service, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in vitro maturation (IVM) efficacy and oocyte retrieval rates after ovarian tissue cryopreservation in young premenarche girls facing chemo- and radiotherapy. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary medical center. PATIENT(S): A total of 84 chemotherapy-naïve patients ages 0-18 years referred for fertility preservation between 2004 and 2017: 33 premenarche and 51 postmenarche patients. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): IVM in the pre- and postmenarche groups and in the subgroups of very young (up to age 5 years) and older (5-10 years) premenarche girls. RESULTS: The number of oocytes retrieved did not significantly differ between the postmenarche and premenarche groups (10.8 ± 8.5 and 8.1 ± 6.8, respectively). However, the overall IVM rate was significantly higher in the postmenarche group (28.2% vs. 15.5%, respectively; odds ratio = 0.47). A separate analysis for patients up to 5 years of age demonstrated significantly lower oocyte yield compared with the older (5-10 years) premenarche girls (4.7 ± 5.2 vs.10.3 ± 7.0 oocytes, respectively) and much lower IVM rates (4.9% and 18.2%, respectively). Correlation of age with number of retrieved and matured oocytes showed a positive significant correlation (r = 0.45 and r = 0.64, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: IVM performed after ovarian tissue cryopreservation in premenarche girls and specifically in very young girls (4 years and younger) yields substantially decreased maturation rates compared with postmenarche patients, raising a question as to the utility of current IVM technique in this age group. Further studies are required to assess modification of the IVM technique for young girls.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in vitro maturation (IVM) efficacy and oocyte retrieval rates after ovarian tissue cryopreservation in young premenarche girls facing chemo- and radiotherapy. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary medical center. PATIENT(S): A total of 84 chemotherapy-naïve patients ages 0-18 years referred for fertility preservation between 2004 and 2017: 33 premenarche and 51 postmenarche patients. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): IVM in the pre- and postmenarche groups and in the subgroups of very young (up to age 5 years) and older (5-10 years) premenarche girls. RESULTS: The number of oocytes retrieved did not significantly differ between the postmenarche and premenarche groups (10.8 ± 8.5 and 8.1 ± 6.8, respectively). However, the overall IVM rate was significantly higher in the postmenarche group (28.2% vs. 15.5%, respectively; odds ratio = 0.47). A separate analysis for patients up to 5 years of age demonstrated significantly lower oocyte yield compared with the older (5-10 years) premenarche girls (4.7 ± 5.2 vs.10.3 ± 7.0 oocytes, respectively) and much lower IVM rates (4.9% and 18.2%, respectively). Correlation of age with number of retrieved and matured oocytes showed a positive significant correlation (r = 0.45 and r = 0.64, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: IVM performed after ovarian tissue cryopreservation in premenarche girls and specifically in very young girls (4 years and younger) yields substantially decreased maturation rates compared with postmenarche patients, raising a question as to the utility of current IVM technique in this age group. Further studies are required to assess modification of the IVM technique for young girls.
Authors: Hafiza Faiza; Majida Khan; Muhammad Rafiq; Anoshiya Ali Khan; Nadir Ali Rind; Syed Habib Ahmed Naqvi Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci Date: 2021-05-29 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Ashley A Diaz; Hana Kubo; Nicole Handa; Maria Hanna; Monica M Laronda Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 6.055
Authors: Sarina N Hanfling; Toral Parikh; Allison Mayhew; Erin Robinson; James Graham; Veronica Gomez-Lobo; Jacqueline Y Maher Journal: F S Rep Date: 2021-04-08
Authors: Gilad Karavani; Peera Wasserzug-Pash; Talya Mordechai-Daniel; Dvora Bauman; Michael Klutstein; Tal Imbar Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2021-06-18