| Literature DB >> 31056077 |
Subhashisa Swain1,2, Minakshi Bhatt3, Sanghamitra Pati4, Ricardo J Soares Magalhaes5,6.
Abstract
This study is aimed to estimate the epidemiological burden of dengue in Odisha, India using the disability adjusted life year (DALY) methods and to explore the associated factors in the year 2010-2016. During the period of 2010-2016, 27 772 cases (68.4% male) were reported in the state. Mean age (years) of male and female was 31.63 and 33.82, respectively. Mean district wise disability adjusted life years (DALY) per 100 000 people was higher in the year 2016 (0.45) and mean DALY lost per person was highest in the year 2015 (34.90 years). Adjusted regression model indicates, every unit increase in humidity and population density increases DALY by 1.05 and 1.02 units respectively. Whereas, unit change in sex ratio (females per 1000 males) and forest coverage increases the DALY by 0.98 units. Our results indicate geographical variation of DALY in Odisha, which is associated with population density, humidity and forest cover. Discrepancies identified between standard incidence and DALY maps suggests, latter can be used to present disease burden more effectively. More prevalence among young males suggests the need of strengthening the targeted prevention and control measures.Entities:
Keywords: Burden; Dengue; Disability adjusted life year; Distribution; India
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31056077 PMCID: PMC6501402 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-019-0541-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Poverty ISSN: 2049-9957 Impact factor: 4.520
Descriptive statistics of variables between 2011 and 2016
| Variables | 2011 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Cochrane Armitage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (%, 95 | 77.41 (75.43–79.39) | 65.61 (64.49–66.74) | 68.65 (67.49–69.81) | 71.69 (69.90–73.49) | 67.64 (66.64–68.65) | Chi square- 111.45, df = 5, (< 0.001)* |
| Female (%, 95 | 22.58 (20.60–24.56) | 34.38 (33.25–35.50) | 31.34 (30.18–32.50) | 28.30 (26.50–30.09) | 32.35 (31.34–33.35) | |
| Age in year (Mean, 95% | 32.89 (32.29–33.50) | 32.98 (32.62–33.35) | 33.65 (33.29–34.01) | 31.00 (30.44–31.55) | 31.12 (30.80–31.43) | < 0.001* |
| Temperature in degree Celsius (Mean, 95% | NC | 29.07 (28.67–29.47) | 30.78 (30.68–30.89) | 31.62 (31.54–31.69) | 30.03 (29.60–30.46) | 3.51 (< 0.001)* |
| Rainfall in mm (Mean, 95% | NC | 1609.48 (1505.85–1713.11) | 1452.39 (1360.24–1544.53) | 1289.45 (1209.60–1369.31) | 1433.83 (1316.27–1551.40) | −3.12 (0.002)* |
| Humidity % (Mean, 95% | NC | 61.68 (59.88–63.47) | 59.69 (59.95–62.42) | 55.12 (52.93–57.32) | 61.25 (59.44–63.05) | −1.36 (0.173) |
| THI (Mean, 95% | NC | 21.55 (21.35–21.74) | 22.36 (22.31–22.41) | 22.72 (22.68–22.76) | 22.01 (21.80–22.22) | 3.50 (< 0.001)* |
| Death in number (count) | 33 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 11 | |
| Regional DALY per 100 000 population (Mean, 95% | NC | 0.09 (−0.03 to 0.21) | 0.15 (− 0.01 to 0.31) | 0.45 (− 0.04 to 0.93) | 0.15 (− 0.02 to 0.33) | 1.05 (0.292) |
| DALY per person in year (Mean, 95% | NC | 30.43 (15.38–45.30) | 33.52 (29.05–37.69) | 34.90 (25.64–43.27) | 29.10 (12.32–45.58) |
*significant at P value < 0.05; THI: Temperature-humidity index; CI: Confidence interval;
(Total cases in 2010 was 34; Total cases in 2012 was 2240. Because of unavailability of complete line listing, descriptive statistics could not be estimated for both the years. NC: Climatic data for the year 2011 was not analysed, as this year’s data was not included in the model)
Fig. 1a Distribution of cases across age in different years in males. b Distribution of cases across age in different years in females
Fig. 2Seasonality of cases per 10 000 population, month wise across three years
Fig. 3Incidences of dengue cases per 10 000 persons from 2010 to 2016
Fig. 4Death due to dengue per 100 000 persons from 2010 to 2016
Fig. 5Distribution of burden (regional DALY per 100 000 persons) from 2013 to 2016
Unadjusted and adjusted negative binomial model for estimating DALY per 100 000 population
| Variables | Unadjusted | Final best fit model |
|---|---|---|
| Sex ratio (Number of females per 1000 males) | 0.96(0.93–0.98)* | 0.98(0.97–0.99)* |
| Literacy rate (%) | 1.09(1.07–1.11)* | |
| Below poverty line (%) | 1.04(1.00–1.08)* | |
| Population density (per square kilometre) | 1.01(1.004–1.02)* | 1.02(1.01–1.04)* |
| Urban areas (%) | 0.97(0.89–1.05) | |
| Number of industries | 1.02(1.01–1.03)* | |
| Forest coverage (%) | 0.98(0.97–0.99)* | 0.98(0.96–0.99)* |
| Average yearly temperature (in Celsius) | 0.69(0.59–0.81)* | 0.71(0.57–0.89)* |
| Average yearly rainfall (in mm) | 1.01(0.99–1.04) | |
| Average yearly humidity (%) | 1.05(1.01–1.08)* | 1.05(1.01–1.09)* |
| Heat indexa | 0.48(0.35–0.67)* | |
| Year | ||
| 2013 | Reference | Reference |
| 2014 | 1.03(0.61–1.74) | 2.25(1.11–4.55)* |
| 2015 | 0.38(0.22–0.66)* | 1.72(0.75–3.95) |
| 2016 | 1.04(0.62–1.76) | 2.02(1.04–3.93)* |
*Significant at P value < 0.05; IRR Incident rate ratio; CI: Confidence interval
aHeat index was dropped from final model because of collinearity