Literature DB >> 31056040

Utility of 24-hour pharyngeal pH monitoring and clinical feature in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

Gang Wang1, Changmin Qu2, Lei Wang1, Hongdan Liu1, Haolun Han1, Bingxin Xu1, Ying Zhou1, Baowei Li1, Yiyan Zhang1, Zhezhe Sun1, Jing Gong1, Lianyong Li2, Wei Wu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: pH monitoring can reflect the changes in H+ in the airway.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the utility of pharyngeal pH monitoring in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical data from 956 suspected LPRD patients from February 2016 to March 2018 were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-one patients had positive Ryan score. The positive rates of reflux symptom index (RSI), reflux finding score (RFS), RSI and RFS and RSI or RFS were 14.7%, 32.5%, 21.9%, 7.8% and 46.5%, respectively. The RFS in the positive Ryan score group was higher than that in the negative Ryan score group [(6 ± 3.5) vs. (4.8 ± 2.9)], while the RSI was not significantly different from that in the negative Ryan score group [(10.9 ± 8) vs. (11.3 ± 7.1)]. Regarding Ryan score as the gold standard in the diagnosis of LPRD, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of identifying LPRD by RSI/RFS were 15.9%, 86.3%, 50.4% and 54%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Ryan score, RSI and RFS have poor correlation in detecting LPRD. Some patients may be missed with the Ryan score as a diagnostic criterion. SIGNIFICANCE: Pharyngeal pH monitoring is useful and more appropriate index is expected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease; Ryan score; pH monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31056040     DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1571280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  4 in total

1.  Does hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux have to be 24 h?

Authors:  Jinhong Zhang; Xiaoyu Wang; Jiasen Wang; Jing Zhao; Chun Zhang; Zhi Liu; Jinrang Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.236

2.  Laryngopharyngeal reflux in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a multi-centre study.

Authors:  Julia Sanchez; Desiree M Schumann; Meropi Karakioulaki; Eleni Papakonstantinou; Frank Rassouli; Matthias Frasnelli; Martin Brutsche; Michael Tamm; Daiana Stolz
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2020-08-21

3.  Poor consistency between reflux symptom index and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring in laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis in Chinese population.

Authors:  Jun-Yao Wang; Tao Peng; Li-Li Zhao; Gui-Jian Feng; Yu-Lan Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

4.  Evaluation of Oropharyngeal pH-Monitoring in the Assessment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Lukas Horvath; Patricia Hagmann; Emanuel Burri; Marcel Kraft
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.