Marc Ziegler1,2, Mitsuhiro Nakamura3, Hideaki Hirashima2, Ryo Ashida2, Michio Yoshimura2, Christoph Bert1, Takashi Mizowaki2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. 3. Division of Medical Physics, Department of Information Technology and Medical Engineering, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inter-fractional changes of the daily anatomy of the patient are a source of error in radiotherapy. This effect is especially present in the abdomen, where there are daily differences in the filling of the stomach or the intestines. This study investigated the impact of inter-fractional changes of pancreatic cancer patients who underwent breath-hold volumetric modulated arc therapy on the applied dose by using deformable image registration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Deformable image registration was used to determine a displacement field which maps the computed tomography (CT) used for treatment planning onto daily breath-hold cone-beam CT images with limited field-of-view (FOV) which were acquired at the beginning of every treatment fraction. Different B-spline registration methods utilizing different metrics and regularizations were used and compared. The resulting deformed planning CT images were used to calculate the dose distributions on the anatomy of the day which can therefore be seen as a good estimation of the actually delivered dose during the treatment fractions. Additionally, the accumulated dose distribution was determined by accumulating all daily dose distributions using inverted deformation fields. The calculated dose distributions were then compared to the planned dose by comparison of dose volume histograms and dosimetric volumetric indices. RESULTS: Best registration results were obtained using a gradient magnitude metric and a regularization of λ = 0.05. The accumulated dose distributions showed that the mean dose delivered to the clinical target volume was on median reduced by 0.61 Gy after 15 fractions from the planned dose. For the organs at risk, the accumulated dose distributions were still fulfilling all clinical goals for the patient cohort used in this study. It was found that rotating and shearing motions of the tumor led to a greater reduction in the mean target dose which correlated with the proximity of the target to the spine (r = 0.54, P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: With the proposed method, it is possible to generate a deformed planning CT image which matches the anatomy of the day based on cone beam computed tomography images with a limited FOV and calculating the dose distribution of the day. The dosimetric impact of the inter-fractional variations was small for most patients but showed larger deviations if the tumor is located in close proximity to the spine.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inter-fractional changes of the daily anatomy of the patient are a source of error in radiotherapy. This effect is especially present in the abdomen, where there are daily differences in the filling of the stomach or the intestines. This study investigated the impact of inter-fractional changes of pancreatic cancerpatients who underwent breath-hold volumetric modulated arc therapy on the applied dose by using deformable image registration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Deformable image registration was used to determine a displacement field which maps the computed tomography (CT) used for treatment planning onto daily breath-hold cone-beam CT images with limited field-of-view (FOV) which were acquired at the beginning of every treatment fraction. Different B-spline registration methods utilizing different metrics and regularizations were used and compared. The resulting deformed planning CT images were used to calculate the dose distributions on the anatomy of the day which can therefore be seen as a good estimation of the actually delivered dose during the treatment fractions. Additionally, the accumulated dose distribution was determined by accumulating all daily dose distributions using inverted deformation fields. The calculated dose distributions were then compared to the planned dose by comparison of dose volume histograms and dosimetric volumetric indices. RESULTS: Best registration results were obtained using a gradient magnitude metric and a regularization of λ = 0.05. The accumulated dose distributions showed that the mean dose delivered to the clinical target volume was on median reduced by 0.61 Gy after 15 fractions from the planned dose. For the organs at risk, the accumulated dose distributions were still fulfilling all clinical goals for the patient cohort used in this study. It was found that rotating and shearing motions of the tumor led to a greater reduction in the mean target dose which correlated with the proximity of the target to the spine (r = 0.54, P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: With the proposed method, it is possible to generate a deformed planning CT image which matches the anatomy of the day based on cone beam computed tomography images with a limited FOV and calculating the dose distribution of the day. The dosimetric impact of the inter-fractional variations was small for most patients but showed larger deviations if the tumor is located in close proximity to the spine.
Authors: Joshua S Niedzielski; Yufei Liu; Sylvia S W Ng; Rachael M Martin; Luis A Perles; Sam Beddar; Neal Rebueno; Eugene J Koay; Cullen Taniguchi; Emma B Holliday; Prajnan Das; Grace L Smith; Bruce D Minsky; Ethan B Ludmir; Joseph M Herman; Albert Koong; Gabriel O Sawakuchi Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-08-13 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Xianjin Dai; Yang Lei; Jacob Wynne; James Janopaul-Naylor; Tonghe Wang; Justin Roper; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Pretesh Patel; Xiaofeng Yang Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 4.071