Literature DB >> 31055765

Regional-surface-based registration for image-guided neurosurgery: effects of scan modes on registration accuracy.

Yuan Dong1,2, Chenxi Zhang3,4, Dafeng Ji1,2,5, Manning Wang1,2, Zhijian Song6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The conventional surface-based method only registers the facial zone with preoperative point cloud, resulting in low accuracy away from the facial area. Acquiring a point cloud of the entire head for registration can improve registration accuracy in all parts of the head. However, it takes a long time to collect a point cloud of the entire head. It may be more practical to selectively scan part of the head to ensure high registration accuracy in the surgical area of interest. In this study, we investigate the effects of different scan regions on registration errors in different target areas when using a surface-based registration method.
METHODS: We first evaluated the correlation between the laser scan resolution and registration accuracy to determine an appropriate scan resolution. Then, with the appropriate resolution, we explored the effects of scan modes on registration error in computer simulation experiments, phantom experiments and two clinical cases. The scan modes were designed based on different combinations of five zones of the head surface, i.e., the sphenoid-frontal zone, parietal zone, left temporal zone, right temporal zone and occipital zone. In the phantom experiment, a handheld scanner was used to acquire a point cloud of the head. A head model containing several tumors was designed, enabling us to calculate the target registration errors deep in the brain to evaluate the effect of regional-surface-based registration. RESULT: The optimal scan modes for tumors located in the sphenoid-frontal, parietal and temporal areas are mode 4 (i.e., simultaneously scanning the sphenoid-frontal zone and the temporal zone), mode 4 and mode 6 (i.e., simultaneously scanning the sphenoid-frontal zone, the temporal zone and the parietal zone), respectively. For the tumor located in the occipital area, no modes were able to achieve reliable accuracy.
CONCLUSION: The results show that selecting an appropriate scan resolution and scan mode can achieve reliable accuracy for use in sphenoid-frontal, parietal and temporal area surgeries while effectively reducing the operation time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image-guided neurosurgery; Point-based registration; Regional-surface-based registration; Target registration error

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31055765     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-019-01990-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  20 in total

1.  Cortical surface registration for image-guided neurosurgery using laser-range scanning.

Authors:  Michael I Miga; Tuhin K Sinha; David M Cash; Robert L Galloway; Robert J Weil
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  Image-guidance for surgical procedures.

Authors:  Terry M Peters
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Comparison of laser surface scanning and fiducial marker-based registration in frameless stereotaxy. Technical note.

Authors:  Kurt Schicho; Michael Figl; Rudolf Seemann; Markus Donat; Michael L Pretterklieber; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Astrid Reichwein; Felix Wanschitz; Franz Kainberger; Helmar Bergmann; Arne Wagner; Rolf Ewers
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Laser surface scanning for patient registration in intracranial image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Andreas Raabe; René Krishnan; Robert Wolff; Elvis Hermann; Michael Zimmermann; Volker Seifert
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  In vivo accuracy of image guidance performed using optical tracking and optimized registration.

Authors:  Christopher R Mascott
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Quantification of true in vivo (application) accuracy in cranial image-guided surgery: influence of mode of patient registration.

Authors:  Christopher R Mascott; Jean-Christophe Sol; Philippe Bousquet; Jacques Lagarrigue; Yves Lazorthes; Valérie Lauwers-Cances
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Automated rejection of contaminated surface measurements for improved surface registration in image guided neurosurgery.

Authors:  R Bucholz; W Macneil; P Fewings; A Ravindra; L McDurmont; C Baumann
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2000

8.  Automated laser registration in image-guided surgery: evaluation of the correlation between laser scan resolution and navigation accuracy.

Authors:  R Marmulla; T Lüth; J Mühling; S Hassfeld
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  High-resolution laser surface scanning for patient registration in cranial computer-assisted surgery.

Authors:  R Marmulla; J Mühling; C R Wirtz; S Hassfeld
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2004-04

10.  Application accuracy in frameless image-guided neurosurgery: a comparison study of three patient-to-image registration methods.

Authors:  Peter A Woerdeman; Peter W A Willems; Herke J Noordmans; Cornelis A F Tulleken; Jan Willem Berkelbach van der Sprenkel
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  2 in total

1.  A hybrid feature-based patient-to-image registration method for robot-assisted long bone osteotomy.

Authors:  Chunlei Zhang; Yu Liu; Yunguang Zhang; He Li
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Correlation between 3D scanner image and MRI for tracking volume changes in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Jung-In Kim; Joo-Hyun Chung; Ohyun Kwon; Jong Min Park; Hong-Gyun Wu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.