| Literature DB >> 31055669 |
Camila Paula de Oliveira1, Márcio Rocha Francelino2,3, Mayara Daher4, Emanuel José Gomes de Araújo1, Leonardo de Souza Sanches1, Kauanna Domingues Cabral de Andrade1, Júlia Santos Nunes de Campos1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Cerrado is the second largest biome in Brazil and the most biodiverse tropical savannah in the world and acts as a great sequester of atmospheric carbon. The lack of studies related to the quantification of its total biomass compromises the understanding of the dynamics of CO2 in this biome. Thus, it is relevant to develop studies aiming at obtaining accurate estimates of the carbon stock in the different phytophysiognomies that make the Cerrado, to include them in appropriate forest management models. Based on the hypothesis that the amount of carbon stored can vary according to the vegetation typology and vegetation compartments, the aerial stock of dry biomass and carbon were estimated in different compartments (arboreal, herbaceous-shrub and litter). The study was developed in open Brazilian savannah and soils on the sandstone and discussed the effect of fire on this phytophysiognomy. For the arboreal compartment were adjusted mathematical models to fit the biomass equations to estimate the individual stock of the trees in this compartment. The results of the stocks were discussed considering the effect of fire on the phytophysiognomy.Entities:
Keywords: Allometric equations; Biomass models; Sand soil; Savannic formations
Year: 2019 PMID: 31055669 PMCID: PMC7227269 DOI: 10.1186/s13021-019-0121-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Carbon Balance Manag ISSN: 1750-0680
Fig. 1Location of study area, boundaries of the states of Bahia, Minas Gerais and Goiás
Frequency of arboreal individuals sampled by diametric class in the OBS for quantification of biomass by a direct method
| Classes of d30cm | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency (%) | Frequency of trees sampled |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0–8.9 | 829 | 74.62 | 23 |
| 9.0–12.9 | 195 | 17.55 | 17 |
| 13.0–16.9 | 59 | 5.31 | 13 |
| 17.0–20.9 | 17 | 1.42 | 5 |
| > 20.9 | 11 | 0.87 | 2 |
| Total | 1.111 | 100 | 60 |
Estimation of the parameters and precision measurements of the adjusted equations for the estimation of the dry biomass stock (kg) as a function of the d30cm in the open Brazilian savannah
| Model |
|
|
|
| R2 % (adjust.) | Sxy (kg) | Sxy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hohenald Krenm | 7.7068* | − 2.4160* | 0.2447 | – | 71.20 | 11.13 | 70.13 |
| Brenac | − 1.8494* | 2.0488 | − 7.8893* | – | 89.46 | 11.58 | 72.89 |
| Spurr | − 2.8828* | 0.0352 | – | – | 89.04 | 6.87 | 43.26 |
| Schumacher-Hall (logarithmic) | − 4.32 | 2.0157 | 1.5258 | – | 94.19 | 5.72 | 35.99 |
| Stoate (Australian) | 4.1867* | − 0.1461 | 0.0649 | − 0.6371* | 93.87 | 5.14 | 32.34 |
| Spurr (logarithmic) | − 4.446 | 1.1305 | – | – | 93.95 | 6.79 | 42.74 |
| Honner | − 5.5889 | 57.2571 | – | – | 94.50 | 4.87 | 30.65 |
| Takata | 40.3464 | − 0.5224 | – | – | 88.67 | 6.98 | 43.98 |
| Schumacher-Hall | 0.01313 | 1.7793 | 2.0228 | – | 94.55 | 4.85 | 30.50 |
*Non-significant coefficients (p > 0.05)
Minimum and maximum values, mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation relative to the dendrometric characteristics and different stocks per compartment of the trees sampled for the adjustment of the models in the OBS
| Variáveis | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Standard deviation | CV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d30 (cm) | 5.09 | 23.55 | 11.11 | 4.48 | 40.42 |
| h (m) | 1.75 | 6.2 | 3.2 | 0.92 | 28.75 |
| Weight—leaves (kg) | 0.06 | 6.39 | 1.148 | 1.557 | 135.96 |
| Weight—thin branches (kg) | 0.18 | 26.344 | 3.609 | 4.376 | 121.38 |
| Weight—thick branches (kg) | 0.135 | 41.745 | 6.512 | 9.037 | 138.72 |
| Weight—trunk (kg) | 1.021 | 119.32 | 16.584 | 21.411 | 129.13 |
| Weight—fruits (kg) | 0.22 | 3.087 | 1.203 | 1.632 | 135.49 |
| Weight—total (kg) | 1.777 | 193.574 | 27.703 | 34.618 | 124.93 |
| Total dry biomass (kg) | 0.883 | 124.564 | 15.882 | 20.755 | 130.66 |
| Total carbon (kg) | 0.415 | 58.545 | 7.465 | 9.755 | 130.68 |
Dry biomass and carbon stocks, density and dominance of individuals in the arboreal compartment of the OBS
| Variable | Mean | Sӯt | (Sӯt) % | Inferior limit | Superior limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density (ind. ha−1) | 556 | 95 | 17.04 | 461 | 650 |
| Basal area (m2 ha−1) | 3.5 | 0.55 | 15.9 | 2.9 | 4.0 |
| Biomass (t ha−1) | 3.5 | 1.1 | 31.19 | 2.4 | 4.6 |
| Carbon (t ha−1) | 1.6 | 0.51 | 31.19 | 1.1 | 2.2 |
Sӯt: absolute sample error; (Sӯt) %: Relative sample error; α: 0.05
Distribution of dry biomass (Mg ha−1) by species and diametric classes in OBS
| Species | Diametric classes (cm) | ∑ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5–8.9 | 9–12.9 | 13–16.9 | 17–20.9 | 21–24.9 | > 25 | ||
|
| 0.235 | 0.255 | 0.085 | 0.022 | – | – | 0.598 |
|
| 0.085 | 0.174 | 0.051 | 0.054 | 0.074 | – | 0.438 |
|
| 0.223 | 0.175 | 0.039 | – | – | – | 0.437 |
|
| 0.185 | 0.099 | 0.073 | 0.003 | 0.041 | – | 0.401 |
|
| 0.003 | – | – | – | – | 0.369 | 0.372 |
|
| 0.043 | 0.044 | 0.032 | 0.021 | 0.072 | 0.130 | 0.341 |
|
| 0.048 | 0.1 | 0.026 | 0.106 | – | – | 0.281 |
|
| 0.017 | 0.037 | 0.074 | – | – | – | 0.129 |
|
| 0.003 | 0.039 | – | 0.084 | – | – | 0.125 |
|
| – | – | – | 0.062 | – | – | 0.062 |
|
| 0.005 | 0.005 | – | 0.049 | – | – | 0.059 |
|
| 0.001 | – | – | – | 0.052 | – | 0.053 |
|
| 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.023 | – | – | – | 0.033 |
|
| 0.002 | 0.006 | – | 0.019 | – | – | 0.027 |
|
| 0.000 | – | 0.016 | – | – | – | 0.016 |
|
| 0.01 | 0.004 | 0.002 | – | – | – | 0.016 |
|
| – | 0.015 | – | – | – | – | 0.015 |
|
| 0.007 | 0.005 | – | – | – | – | 0.012 |
|
| 0.002 | 0.009 | – | – | – | – | 0.011 |
|
| – | – | 0.011 | – | – | – | 0.011 |
|
| 0.002 | 0.005 | – | – | – | – | 0.007 |
| – | 0.007 | – | – | – | – | 0.007 | |
|
| – | 0.006 | – | – | – | – | 0.006 |
|
| 0.005 | 0.001 | – | – | – | – | 0.006 |
|
| 0.004 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.004 |
|
| 0.002 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.002 |
|
| 0.002 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.002 |
| – | 0.001 | – | – | – | – | 0.001 | |
|
| 0.001 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.001 |
| 0.001 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.001 | |
| 0.001 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.001 | |
|
| 0.001 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.001 |
|
| 0.001 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.001 |
|
| 0.000 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.000 |
| ∑ | 0.896 | 0.993 | 0.431 | 0.420 | 0.239 | 0.499 | 3.477 |
| % of total | 25.76 | 28.56 | 12.40 | 12.08 | 6.86 | 14.34 | 100.00 |
aHigher importance value index (IVI) in open Brazilian savannah
Dry biomass and carbon stocks in the different components of the herbaceous-shrub compartment of OBS
| Variable | Mean | Sӯt | (Sӯt) % | Inferior limit | Superior limit | % of Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biomass—total (Mg ha−1) | 5.63 | 0.64 | 11.39 | 5.00 | 6.28 | 100 |
| Biomass—grasses (Mg ha−1) | 5.42 | 0.57 | 10.48 | 4.85 | 5.98 | 96.28 |
| Biomass—branches (kg ha−1) | 17.67 | 15.05 | 85.15 | 2.62 | 32.73 | 0.31 |
| Biomass—leaves (kg ha−1) | 4.74 | 3.61 | 76.30 | 1.12 | 8.35 | 0.08 |
Sӯt: absolute sample error; (Sӯt) %: relative sample error; α: 0.05
Dry biomass and carbon stocks present in the litter of OBS
| Variable | Mean | Sӯt | (Sӯt) % | Inferior limit | Superior limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry biomass (Mg ha−1) | 3.75 | 0.95 | 12.05 | 2.80 | 4.70 |
| Carbon (Mg ha−1) | 1.66 | 0.42 | 12.05 | 1.24 | 2.08 |
Sӯt: absolute sample error; (Sӯt) %: relative sample error; α: 0.05
Fig. 2The distribution of the total aboveground biomass stock per compartment evaluated in the OBS