Uwe Güth1,2, Constanze Elfgen3,4, Giacomo Montagna5,6, Seraina Margaretha Schmid5,7. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, Brust-Zentrum Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland, uwe.gueth@unibas.ch. 2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel (UHB), Basel, Switzerland, uwe.gueth@unibas.ch. 3. Department of Breast Surgery, Brust-Zentrum Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland. 4. Senology Department, Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany. 5. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel (UHB), Basel, Switzerland. 6. Breast Center, UHB, Basel, Switzerland. 7. Breast Center St. Gallen, Location Spital Grabs, Grabs, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous data showed that distant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) might be curable in up to 3% of the cases in selected patients, mostly young, with good performance status and with low-volume metastatic disease, mainly by an aggressive multidisciplinary approach including aggressive combination chemotherapy regimens. These long-lasting responses question the belief that MBC is wholly incurable. This study evaluates the rate of long-term survivors and potentially cured patients in an unselected cohort of MBC patients. METHODS: We analyzed the data from 342 patients in whom distant MBC was diagnosed from 1990 to 2011. For this study, we defined a metastatic disease survival (MDS) of 9 years as inclusion criterion for long-term survivorship. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (5.3%) were long-term survivors (MDS: 126 months; range, 108-300 months). The rate of long-term survivors was equally distributed over time (1990-1999: 4.3% vs. 2000-2011: 5.9%, p = 0.63). Compared to patients who had a lower MDS, long-term survivors had significantly more often primary MBC (p = 0.005) and hormone receptor-positive carcinomas (p = 0.015). Age at MBC diagnosis, presence of visceral metastases, and limited number of metastatic sites at the time of MBC diagnosis appeared to have no significant impact on long-term survival. Long-term survival was not associated with the use of chemotherapy (50.0% vs. 65.7% in the control group, p = 0.21). Eight patients (2.3%) developed a complete remission and presented with no evidence of disease at the time of last follow-up (MDS: 234.5 months). CONCLUSION: Since long-term survivors in MBC comprise a relatively heterogeneous group, the factors that lead to the quite rare and felicitous case of long-term survival or even cure can hardly be evaluated systematically. Some patients may be considered cured of their disease. This fraction may be small, but the chance of survival, and even of cure, truly exists. Perhaps we must accept that the factors contributing to long-term survival remain an enigma. It appears, however, that aggressive chemotherapy is not the only key factor to long-term remission.
BACKGROUND: Previous data showed that distant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) might be curable in up to 3% of the cases in selected patients, mostly young, with good performance status and with low-volume metastatic disease, mainly by an aggressive multidisciplinary approach including aggressive combination chemotherapy regimens. These long-lasting responses question the belief that MBC is wholly incurable. This study evaluates the rate of long-term survivors and potentially cured patients in an unselected cohort of MBCpatients. METHODS: We analyzed the data from 342 patients in whom distant MBC was diagnosed from 1990 to 2011. For this study, we defined a metastatic disease survival (MDS) of 9 years as inclusion criterion for long-term survivorship. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (5.3%) were long-term survivors (MDS: 126 months; range, 108-300 months). The rate of long-term survivors was equally distributed over time (1990-1999: 4.3% vs. 2000-2011: 5.9%, p = 0.63). Compared to patients who had a lower MDS, long-term survivors had significantly more often primary MBC (p = 0.005) and hormone receptor-positive carcinomas (p = 0.015). Age at MBC diagnosis, presence of visceral metastases, and limited number of metastatic sites at the time of MBC diagnosis appeared to have no significant impact on long-term survival. Long-term survival was not associated with the use of chemotherapy (50.0% vs. 65.7% in the control group, p = 0.21). Eight patients (2.3%) developed a complete remission and presented with no evidence of disease at the time of last follow-up (MDS: 234.5 months). CONCLUSION: Since long-term survivors in MBC comprise a relatively heterogeneous group, the factors that lead to the quite rare and felicitous case of long-term survival or even cure can hardly be evaluated systematically. Some patients may be considered cured of their disease. This fraction may be small, but the chance of survival, and even of cure, truly exists. Perhaps we must accept that the factors contributing to long-term survival remain an enigma. It appears, however, that aggressive chemotherapy is not the only key factor to long-term remission.
Authors: Maurizio Cardi; Marc Pocard; Rea Lo Dico; Gianmaria Fiorentini; Mario Valle; Roberta Gelmini; Marco Vaira; Enrico Maria Pasqual; Salvatore Asero; Gianluca Baiocchi; Andrea Di Giorgio; Alessandra Spagnoli; Francesco Di Marzo; Bianca Sollazzo; Giuseppe D'Ermo; Daniele Biacchi; Franco Iafrate; Paolo Sammartino Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Greta Bütepage; Peter Carlqvist; Johanna Jacob; Asbjørn Toft Hornemann; Simona Vertuani Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-10-14 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Stefan Stefanovic; Thomas M Deutsch; Sabine Riethdorf; Chiara Fischer; Andreas Hartkopf; Peter Sinn; Manuel Feisst; Klaus Pantel; Michael Golatta; Sara Y Brucker; Marc Sütterlin; Andreas Schneeweiss; Markus Wallwiener Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-03-21 Impact factor: 5.923