| Literature DB >> 31055282 |
Bruce Crosson1,2, Amy D Rodriguez3,2, David Copland4,5, Julius Fridriksson6, Lisa C Krishnamurthy3,7, Marcus Meinzer8, Anastasia M Raymer9, Venkatagiri Krishnamurthy3,2, Alexander P Leff10.
Abstract
Given the profound impact of language impairment after stroke (aphasia), neuroplasticity research is garnering considerable attention as means for eventually improving aphasia treatments and how they are delivered. Functional and structural neuroimaging studies indicate that aphasia treatments can recruit both residual and new neural mechanisms to improve language function and that neuroimaging modalities may hold promise in predicting treatment outcome. In relatively small clinical trials, both non-invasive brain stimulation and behavioural manipulations targeting activation or suppression of specific cortices can improve aphasia treatment outcomes. Recent language interventions that employ principles consistent with inducing neuroplasticity also are showing improved performance for both trained and novel items and contexts. While knowledge is rapidly accumulating, larger trials emphasising how to select optimal paradigms for individualised aphasia treatment are needed. Finally, a model of how to incorporate the growing knowledge into clinical practice could help to focus future research. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: aphasia; brain mapping; functional imaging; rehabilitation; stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31055282 PMCID: PMC8014302 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ISSN: 0022-3050 Impact factor: 10.154