| Literature DB >> 31054568 |
Shenghong Hu1,2, Yuanhai Li3, Shengbin Wang2, Siqi Xu2, Xia Ju2, Li Ma4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine treatments have been proposed as methods for inhibiting cough. We compared the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine treatments on inhibiting cough during the tracheal extubation period after thyroid surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Cough; Dexmedetomidine; Lidocaine; Thyroid surgery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31054568 PMCID: PMC6500031 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0739-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Anesthesiol ISSN: 1471-2253 Impact factor: 2.217
Fig. 1CONSORT flow diagram for the study
Demographic and clinical characteristics
| Variables | LIDO group | DEX group | CON group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Age (yr) | 48.4 ± 8.8 | 47.6 ± 7.8 | 49.3 ± 7.2 | 0.661 |
| Weight (kg) | 58.8 ± 6.9 | 57.6 ± 5.7 | 60.1 ± 6.4 | 0.320 |
| Height (cm) | 158.6 ± 5.1 | 157.7 ± 4.5 | 158.9 ± 6.1 | 0.815 |
| ASA class (I/II) | 55/5 | 58/2 | 57/3 | 0.477 |
| Gender, Female/Male | 35/25 | 37/23 | 34/26 | 0.933 |
| PLT(10 × 109/L) | 197.3 ± 39.9 | 198.5.6 ± 34.2 | 181.044.8 | 0.412 |
| PT(s) | 10.6 ± 0.8 | 10.4 ± 0.8 | 10.8 ± 0.6 | 0.280 |
| APTT(s) | 27.5 ± 2.6 | 26.3 ± 4.2 | 27.4 ± 2.5 | 0.524 |
| Fib(g/L) | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 2.2 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 0.143 |
| Duration of anesthesia (min) | 82.1 ± 19.4 | 92.2 ± 25.5 | 81.8 ± 20.4 | 0.242 |
| Duration of surgery (min) | 99.4 ± 20.7 | 111.4 ± 30.8 | 104.0 ± 24.1 | 0.333 |
| Intraoperative fluid input (mL) | 691.0 ± 155.9 | 638.0 ± 151.3 | 725..0 ± 170.6 | 0.229 |
| Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | 59.9 ± 12.2 | 61.9 ± 11.3 | 65.7 ± 12.3 | 0.368 |
| Intraoperative urine output (mL) | 447.5 ± 90.1 | 428.9 ± 98.5 | 423.8 ± 80.5 | 0.682 |
Categorical variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or numbers. LIDO group, iv. lidocaine; DEX group, iv. dexmedetomidine; CON group, iv. equal volume normal saline
Incidence and grade of cough
| Variables | LIDO group | DEX group | CON group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Incidence of cough, n (%) | 17 (28.3) * | 19 (31.7) * | 40 (66.7) | 0.000 |
| Grade 0 | 43 (71.7) * | 41 (68.3) * | 20 (33.3) | 0.000 |
| Grade 1 | 9 (15.0) | 11 (18.3) | 14 (23.3) | 0.502 |
| Grade 2 | 6 (10.0) ** | 5 (8.4) ** | 16 (26.7) | 0.008 |
| Grade 3 | 2 (3.3) ** | 3 (5.0) ** | 10 (16.7) | 0.016 |
Categorical variables were expressed as numbers (proportions). LIDO group, iv. lidocaine; DEX group, iv. dexmedetomidine; CON group, iv. equal volume normal saline. The severity of cough was evaluated during the recovery period from the time of awareness to 5 min after extubation: 0 = no cough, 1 = minimal (single) cough, 2 = moderate (≤5 s) cough and 3 = severe (> 5 s) cough (bucking)
*P = 0.000 vs the CON group; **P < 0.05 vs the CON group
MAP and HR change
| Variables | LIDO group | DEX group | CON group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| MAP (mmHg) | ||||
| Before induction | 86.9 ± 12.6 | 83.6 ± 10.4 | 87.6 ± 13.4 | 0.167 |
| During tracheal extubation | 84.8 ± 14.4 | 88.2 ± 14.5 | 101.4 ± 13.3* | 0.000 |
| 5 min after tracheal extubation | 91.7 ± 16.5 | 90.8 ± 13.1 | 104.7 ± 15.7* | 0.000 |
| HR (beat/min) | ||||
| Before induction | 79.8 ± 10.4 | 83.5 ± 13.4 | 83.6 ± 15.3 | 0.198 |
| During tracheal extubation | 80.7 ± 12.4 | 79.4 ± 8.1 | 95.3 ± 13.6* | 0.000 |
| 5 min after tracheal extubation | 86.6 ± 13.8 | 85.2 ± 11.6 | 101.1 ± 15.6* | 0.000 |
Categorical variables were presented as the mean ± standard deviation for all of the patients, with 60 cases in each group. LIDO group, iv. lidocaine; DEX group, iv. dexmedetomidine; CON group, iv. equal volume normal saline. MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate. Compared with the LIDO group and the DEX group, both MAP and HR were significantly increased in the CON group during tracheal extubation and 5 min after tracheal extubation (*P = 0.000)
Volume of drainage within 48 h after surgery
| Variables | LIDO group | DEX group | CON group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Volume of drainage (mL) | ||||
| within the first 24 h after surgery | 68.3 ± 10.5* | 71.0 ± 13.7* | 108.1 ± 18.9 | 0.000 |
| within the second 24 h after surgery | 23.9 ± 7.8* | 24.2 ± 6.4* | 51.0 ± 29.6 | 0.000 |
Categorical variables were presented as the mean ± standard deviation for all of the patients. LIDO group, iv. lidocaine; DEX group, iv. dexmedetomidine; CON group, iv. equal volume normal saline, with 60 cases in each group. Compared with the CON group, the volume of drainage was significantly reduced in the LIDO group and the DEX group (*P = 0.000)
Recovery profile after the surgery
| Variables | LIDO group | DEX group | CON group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Time to awareness (min) | 10.2 ± 1.7 | 19.1 ± 2.6* | 9.3 ± 2.2 | 0.000 |
| Postoperative length of hospital stay (d) | 3.4 ± 0.9 | 3.6 ± 0.9 | 5.0 ± 1.5* | 0.001 |
Categorical variables were presented as the mean ± standard deviation for all of the patients, with 60 cases in each group. LIDO group, iv. lidocaine; DEX group, iv. dexmedetomidine; CON group, iv. equal volume normal saline. Time to awareness = time from discontinuation of propofol and remifentanil to spontaneous eye opening by light stimulation. Compared with the LIDO group and the CON group, the time to awareness was longer in the DEX group (*P = 0.000). Compared with the LIDO group and the DEX group, the postoperative length of hospital stay was longer in the CON group (*P < 0.01)
VAS pain scores at any point time after the surgery
| Variables | LIDO group | DEX group | CON group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| VAS scores | ||||
| At 2 h | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.7* | 0.000 |
| At 4 h | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 3.9 ± 0.8* | 0.000 |
| At 8 h | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 5.4 ± 0.6* | 0.000 |
| At 12 h | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 5.7 ± 0.8* | 0.000 |
| At 24 h | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 4.1 ± 0.5* | 0.000 |
Categorical variables were presented as the mean ± standard deviation for all of the patients, with 60 cases in each group. LIDO group, iv. lidocaine; DEX group, iv. dexmedetomidine; CON group, iv. equal volume normal saline. Compared with the LIDO group and the DEX group, VAS pain scores were higher in the CON group (*P < 0.01)