Literature DB >> 31053521

Neuromodulation techniques for status epilepticus: A review.

Daniel San-Juan1, Daniel Oswaldo Dávila-Rodríguez2, Christian Ramos Jiménez3, Manuel Sánchez González4, Sergio Mayorquín Carranza5, Jesús Ricardo Hernández Mendoza6, David J Anschel7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), Vagal Nerve Stimulation (VNS), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) are neuromodulation therapies that have been used to treat Status Epilepticus (SE).
OBJECTIVE: Review the literature about the efficacy and safety of neuromodulation therapies in SE in humans.
METHODS: We searched studies in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Science Direct (inception to June 2018). Four review authors independently selected the studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, PRISMA guidelines, Oxford and GRADE scales, and Murad et al., 2018 methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports.
RESULTS: We analyzed 27 articles (45 patients) with 4 different neuromodulation therapies. In ECT we found 80% rate of disruption of SE and 5% of adverse events was reported. Using iVNS 15/16 (93.7%) patients resolved the SE. All patients who underwent TMS and DBS aborted SE, however, 50% of patients with DBS had severe adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Case series and case reports suggest that neuromodulation therapies can abort SE in 80-100% of patients (Oxford scale and GRADE were level 4 and D) with a wide range of adverse effects, which claims for prospective studies on the relationship be-tween efficacy and safety.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep brain stimulation; Electroconvulsive therapy; Refractory status epilepticus; Status epilepticus; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Vagal nerve stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31053521     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  5 in total

Review 1.  Status epilepticus - time is brain and treatment considerations.

Authors:  Caroline Der-Nigoghossian; Clio Rubinos; Ayham Alkhachroum; Jan Claassen
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.687

2.  Responsive neurostimulation for focal motor status epilepticus.

Authors:  Jimmy C Yang; Nitish M Harid; Fábio A Nascimento; Vasileios Kokkinos; Abigail Shaughnessy; Alice D Lam; M Brandon Westover; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Leigh R Hochberg; Eric S Rosenthal; Andrew J Cole; Robert M Richardson; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.511

3.  Refractory Status Epilepticus in Genetic Epilepsy-Is Vagus Nerve Stimulation an Option?

Authors:  Nicola Specchio; Alessandro Ferretti; Nicola Pietrafusa; Marina Trivisano; Costanza Calabrese; Giusy Carfì Pavia; Alessandro De Benedictis; Carlo Efisio Marras; Luca de Palma; Federico Vigevano
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Preliminary analysis of the effect of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of children with intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  Tie Fang; Zi-Hang Xie; Ting-Hong Liu; Jie Deng; Shuai Chen; Feng Chen; Li-Li Zheng
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Neurostimulation stabilizes spiking neural networks by disrupting seizure-like oscillatory transitions.

Authors:  Scott Rich; Axel Hutt; Frances K Skinner; Taufik A Valiante; Jérémie Lefebvre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.