| Literature DB >> 31053074 |
Jiajia Li1,2, Leiyu Shi3, Hailun Liang3, Chao Ma4, Lingzhong Xu1,2, Wen Qin5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2009, China unveiled an ambitious national health care reform program, with the goal of providing equitable and affordable basic health care for everyone. This study was intended to partially fill the knowledge gap in understanding of the demand-side impact on health care utilization and affordability among older people in Zhejiang and Gansu provinces of China.Entities:
Keywords: China’s health reform; Inpatient; Out-of-pocket; Outpatient; Pharmaceutical spending
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31053074 PMCID: PMC6500029 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-019-0969-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Equity Health ISSN: 1475-9276
Respondents characteristics
| Variables | All | 2008 | 2012 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 60.89 (0.15) | 59.86 (0.35) | 63.18 (0.31) | 0.000 |
| Female | 49.85 | 49.92 | 49.76 | 0.536 |
| Single | 17.60 | 17.54 | 17.67 | 0.794 |
| Education level | 0.751 | |||
| Illiterate (reference) | 40.16 | 40.40 | 39.90 | |
| Below primary but can read/write | 20.71 | 20.18 | 21.29 | |
| Primary school | 17.64 | 17.33 | 17.99 | |
| Junior high school and above | 21.48 | 22.08 | 20.83 | |
| Log (Household expenditure per capita) (RMB in 2012 value) | 8.62 (0.06) | 8.65 (0.06) | 8.57 (0.07) | 0.316 |
| With at least one ADL difficulty | 11.86 | 9.56 | 14.37 | 0.000 |
| Self-reported health status | 0.054 | |||
| Excellent/good health | 32.36 | 33.40 | 31.22 | |
| Fair health | 45.85 | 43.55 | 48.36 | |
| Poor/very poor health | 21.80 | 23.05 | 20.43 | |
| Types of medical insurance | 0.000 | |||
| None (reference) | 6.49 | 8.03 | 4.81 | |
| NCMS | 72.12 | 74.86 | 69.11 | |
| URBMI | 4.22 | 3.24 | 5.29 | |
| UEBMI | 12.25 | 11.37 | 13.22 | |
| IBMI | 2.90 | 0 | 3.34 | |
| Others | 2.02 | 2.50 | 4.23 | |
| Get reimbursement immediately | 43.12 | 31.04 | 56.34 | 0.000 |
| observations | 4369 | 2248 | 2121 |
The proportions reported in the table are weighted proportions. The means reported in the table are weighted means, and robust standard errors (Ses) are in parentheses, all stratified by county level and clustered at PSU. χ2 tests for dichotomous variables and t-tests for continuous variables
Healthcare utilization, Health burden, and PS proportion before and after 2009 health reform
| Variables | All | 2008 | 2012 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Outpatient | ||||
| % of outpatient visit, % | 22.72 | 21.72 | 23.86 | 0.500 |
| Frequency of outpatient visits, mean(SD) | 2.46 (0.12) | 2.64 (0.19) | 2.26 (0.16) | 0.133 |
| OOP-to-THEs %, mean(SD) | 86.95 (1.44) | 90.74 (1.97) | 82.51 (2.56) | 0.004 |
| PS-to-THEs %, mean(SD) | 81.89 (1.89) | 86.86 (2.03) | 76.30 (2.84) | 0.000 |
| Inpatient | ||||
| % of being hospitalized, % | 11.86 | 8.40 | 15.85 | 0.000 |
| Frequency of hospitalization, mean(SD) | 1.34 (0.05) | 1.27 (0.06) | 1.38 (0.07) | 0.306 |
| OOP-to-THEs%, mean(SD) | 61.02 (2.51) | 61.24 (3.97) | 60.88 (3.17) | 0.552 |
| PS-to-THEs%, mean(SD) | 55.68 (3.66) | 54.19 (6.44) | 56.74 (3.99) | 0.910 |
|
| ||||
| Outpatient | ||||
| % of outpatient visit, % | 20.11 | 17.93 | 22.43 | 0.011 |
| Frequency of outpatient visits, mean(SD) | 2.16 (0.11) | 2.09 (0.16) | 2.22 (0.14) | 0.537 |
| OOP-to-THEs%, mean(SD) | 74.76 (5.00) | 77.89 (5.66) | 71.83 (5.11) | 0.226 |
| PS-to-THEs%, mean(SD) | 69.25 (2.52) | 79.25 (2.93) | 61.20 (3.83) | 0.004 |
| Inpatient | ||||
| % of being hospitalized, % | 6.91 | 6.63 | 7.22 | 0.104 |
| Frequency of hospitalization, mean(SD) | 1.24 (0.08) | 1.13 (0.40) | 1.33 (0.13) | 0.203 |
| OOP-to-THEs%, mean(SD) | 61.41 (4.77) | 61.78 (6.80) | 60.99 (5.05) | 0.624 |
| PS-to-THEs%, mean(SD) | 41.68 (4.48) | 41.51 (4.28) | 41.88 (7.17) | 0.806 |
The proportions reported in the table are weighted proportions. The means reported in the table are weighted means, and robust standard errors (Ses) are in parentheses, all stratified by county level and clustered at PSU. χ2 tests for dichotomous variables and t-tests for continuous variables
Two-part model: utilization and affordability
| VARIABLES | Selection equation: utilization > 0 | Outpatient | Inpatient | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome equation: conditional OOP% | Outcome equation: conditional PS% | Selection equation: utilization > 0 | Outcome equation: conditional OOP% | Outcome equation: conditional PS% | ||
| Health Reform:2012 | 1.021 | −0.998* | −2.324*** | 1.068 | −0.217 | 1.539 |
| (0.025) | (0.583) | (0.831) | (0.0458) | (0.908) | (0.994) | |
| Province: Zhejiang | 1.383** | 7.288** | 7.817** | 1.583*** | −3.427 | −1.197 |
| (0.188) | (3.058) | (3.432) | (0.235) | (4.435) | (6.736) | |
| Age | 1.007 | −0.00543 | 0.405** | 1.034*** | − 0.382** | 0.181 |
| (0.006) | (0.134) | (0.188) | (0.00774) | (0.189) | (0.326) | |
| Gender: Female | 1.697*** | −0.288 | 5.164* | 0.821 | −5.350* | 2.439 |
| (0.214) | (1.791) | (2.769) | (0.121) | (3.209) | (5.811) | |
| Marital status: Others | 1.027 | 3.227 | −0.597 | 0.775 | 9.122** | 11.83** |
| (0.128) | (2.702) | (4.563) | (0.141) | (3.724) | (5.803) | |
| Education level: | 1.644*** | −0.363 | 1.728 | 0.954 | −3.507 | 0.349 |
| Can read/writing | (0.253) | (2.718) | (4.277) | (0.202) | (4.254) | (6.402) |
| Education level: | 1.538** | −0.655 | 0.377 | 0.981 | −8.724* | −8.845 |
| Primary school | (0.275) | (2.501) | (4.424) | (0.163) | (4.557) | (8.851) |
| Education level: | 1.282* | −1.596 | −1.835 | 0.966 | −10.43** | 6.469 |
| Junior high and above | (0.174) | (2.572) | (4.076) | (0.190) | (4.207) | (6.483) |
| Expenditure | 1.117** | 1.291* | −1.778* | 1.142* | 1.868 | −2.593 |
| (RMB in 2012 value) | (0.0503) | (0.710) | (0.914) | (0.0820) | (1.697) | (3.091) |
| ADL: | 1.291* | −0.968 | −0.736 | 1.583** | 8.296** | 10.52* |
| With any ADL | (0.181) | (2.445) | (3.056) | (0.298) | (4.114) | (6.147) |
| Self-reported health: | 2.147*** | −2.540 | −4.277 | 1.691*** | −7.541 | −14.13** |
| Fair health | (0.237) | (2.916) | (4.178) | (0.325) | (5.629) | (6.455) |
| Self-reported health: | 3.952*** | −1.679 | −6.893 | 3.734*** | −10.34* | − 12.59* |
| Poor/very poor health | (0.572) | (2.676) | (4.490) | (0.637) | (5.585) | (6.582) |
| Types of insurance: | 0.912 | −4.532** | 8.784* | 1.321 | −24.31*** | 0.721 |
| NCMS | (0.177) | (1.782) | (5.114) | (0.489) | (3.039) | (4.061) |
| Types of insurance: | 1.275 | −16.33** | 3.388 | 1.831 | −34.41*** | −5.620 |
| URBMI | (0.351) | (6.671) | (8.567) | (0.862) | (2.859) | (15.98) |
| Types of insurance: | 1.651 | − 39.65*** | 12.10* | 1.767 | −48.90*** | −2.760 |
| UEBMI | (0.507) | (8.006) | (6.987) | (0.726) | (7.024) | (6.012) |
| Types of insurance: | 1.262 | −14.33** | 8.904 | 1.312 | −51.00*** | −1.348 |
| Others | (0.324) | (6.590) | (7.966) | (0.621) | (8.751) | (7.997) |
| Types of insurance: | 1.469 | 0.975 | 20.08** | 1.049 | −17.65*** | 51.99*** |
| IBMI | (0.450) | (2.371) | (8.945) | (0.550) | (3.990) | (7.373) |
| Get reimbursement | 1.440*** | −4.581* | −2.543 | 0.991 | −0.590 | −13.78** |
| Immediately | (0.152) | (2.411) | (3.524) | (0.167) | (4.137) | (6.080) |
| Constant | 678.1*** | 2092* | 4732*** | −96.12 | 550.2 | − 3017 |
| (192.0) | (1171) | (1672) | (95.55) | (1817) | (1989) | |
Robust standard errors are reported in parenthesis.
***p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1