Literature DB >> 31053038

Does Self-Determination Theory help explain the impact of social prescribing? A qualitative analysis of patients' experiences of the Glasgow 'Deep-End' Community Links Worker Intervention.

Peter Hanlon1, Cindy M Gray1, Nai Rui Chng1, Stewart W Mercer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Links Worker Programme is a primary care-based social prescribing initiative in Glasgow, Scotland, targeting patients with complex needs in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation. The programme aims to improve wellbeing by connecting patients to appropriate community resources. This study explored the utility of Self-Determination Theory in understanding the reported impacts of the intervention.
METHODS: Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 12 patients (34-64 years, six female) referred to Community Links Practitioners using Self-Determination Theory as a framework. Impact was assessed from participants' description of their personal circumstances before and after interaction with the Community Links Practitioner.
RESULTS: Four patients described no overall change in daily life, two described slight improvement and six described moderate or major improvement. Improvers described satisfaction of the three psychological needs identified in Self-Determination Theory: relatedness, competence and autonomy. This often related to greater participation in community activities and sense of competence in social interaction. Patients who benefitted most described a change towards more intrinsic regulation of behaviour following the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the impact of this social prescribing initiative was facilitated by analysis using Self-Determination Theory. Self-Determination Theory may therefore be a useful theoretical framework for the development and evaluation of new interventions in this setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Self-Determination Theory; Social prescribing; primary care; socioeconomic deprivation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31053038     DOI: 10.1177/1742395319845427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronic Illn        ISSN: 1742-3953


  5 in total

1.  Do people perceive benefits in the use of social prescribing to address loneliness and/or social isolation? A qualitative meta-synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  M Liebmann; A Pitman; Yung-Chia Hsueh; M Bertotti; E Pearce
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Social prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of service providers' and clients' experiences.

Authors:  Stephanie L Morris; Kate Gibson; Josephine M Wildman; Bethan Griffith; Suzanne Moffatt; Tessa M Pollard
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Exploring how and why social prescribing evaluations work: a realist review.

Authors:  Megan Elliott; Mark Davies; Julie Davies; Carolyn Wallace
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  What does the literature mean by social prescribing? A critical review using discourse analysis.

Authors:  Sara Calderón-Larrañaga; Trish Greenhalgh; Sarah Finer; Megan Clinch
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2022-04-11

Review 5.  Can Social Prescribing Foster Individual and Community Well-Being? A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Dragana Vidovic; Gina Yannitell Reinhardt; Clare Hammerton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.