| Literature DB >> 31052510 |
Sarah C Finch1, John S Munday2, Jan M Sprosen3, Sweta Bhattarai4.
Abstract
Epichloë endophytes have been used successfully in pastoral grasses providing protection against insect pests through the expression of secondary metabolites. This approach could be extended to other plant species, such as cereals, reducing reliance on pesticides. To be successful, the selected endophyte must express secondary metabolites that are active against cereal insect pests without any secondary metabolite, which is harmful to animals. Chanoclavine is of interest as it is commonly expressed by endophytes and has potential insecticidal activity. Investigation of possible mammalian toxicity is therefore required. An acute oral toxicity study showed the median lethal dose of chanoclavine to be >2000 mg/kg. This allows it to be classified as category 5 using the globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals, and category 6.1E using the New Zealand Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) hazard classes, the lowest hazard class under both systems of classification. A three-week feeding study was also performed, which showed chanoclavine, at a dose rate of 123.9 mg/kg/day, initially reduced food consumption but was resolved by day seven. No toxicologically significant effects on gross pathology, histology, hematology, or blood chemistry were observed. These experiments showed chanoclavine to be of low toxicity and raised no food safety concerns.Entities:
Keywords: Epichloë; acute toxicity; chanoclavine; endophyte; subchronic feeding study; toxicology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31052510 PMCID: PMC6563201 DOI: 10.3390/toxins11050249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Structure of chanoclavine.
Figure 2Food consumption of (a) male and (b) female mice fed control (■) and chanoclavine (□, 563 µg/g) diets.
Figure 3Bodyweights of (a) male and (b) female mice fed control (■) and chanoclavine (□, 563 µg/g) diets. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean but are too small to be visible in some cases.
Hematology data from mice fed treatment diets for 21 d.
| Item | Control 1 | Chanoclavine 1 | SED | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| HCT (L/L) | 0.46 ± 0.01 | 0.47 ± 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.620 |
| HB (g/L) | 140.8 ± 3.6 | 142.8 ± 4.9 | 2.72 | 0.483 |
| RBC (×1012/L) | 8.8 ± 0.30 | 8.9 ± 0.4 | 0.21 | 0.527 |
| MCV (fL) | 52.8 ± 1.5 | 53.2 ± 1.3 | 0.88 | 0.663 |
| MCH (pg) | 16.2 ± 0.4 | 16.2 ± 0.4 | 0.28 | 1.000 |
| MCHC (g/L) | 303.8 ± 2.6 | 303.6 ± 4.6 | 2.35 | 0.934 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 10.3 ± 1.6 | 10.4 ± 1.7 | 1.06 | 0.884 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 17.6 ± 1.5 | 19.4 ± 7.5 | 3.42 | 0.613 |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 75.8 ± 5.2 | 69.6 ± 8.9 | 4.62 | 0.216 |
| Monocyte (%) | 3.2 ± 1.6 | 4.8 ± 1.5 | 0.99 | 0.145 |
| Eosinophil (%) | 3.0 ± 2.0 | 3.0 ± 1.9 | 1.23 | 1.000 |
| Basophil (%) | 0.4 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 7.2 | 3.21 | 0.408 |
|
| ||||
| HCT (L/L) | 0.47 ± 0.01 | 0.49 ± 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.213 |
| HB (g/L) | 145.4 ± 1.3 | 151.0 ± 12.5 | 5.61 | 0.347 |
| RBC (×1012/L) | 8.9 ± 0.1 | 9.4 ± 0.8 | 0.35 | 0.149 |
| MCV (fL) | 52.8 ± 0.8 | 51.8 ± 1.3 | 0.69 | 0.187 |
| MCH (pg) | 16.4 ± 0.5 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 0.25 | 0.141 |
| MCHC (g/L) | 311.0 ± 3.7 | 308.6 ± 3.0 | 2.14 | 0.294 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 7.4 ± 2.1 | 8.5 ± 1.9 | 1.27 | 0.405 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 13.6 ± 3.1 a | 9.4 ± 1.7 b | 1.59 | 0.029 |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 78.0 ± 3.7 | 81.4 ± 2.4 | 1.97 | 0.122 |
| Monocyte (%) | 3.6 ± 1.1 | 4.0 ± 1.6 | 0.87 | 0.659 |
| Eosinophil (%) | 4.8 ± 1.3 | 4.6 ± 0.9 | 0.71 | 0.784 |
| Basophil (%) | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 1.3 | 0.60 | 0.347 |
1 Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 5). Fisher’s least significant difference was used to compare treatment means. Two means that have no letter in common are statistically different at the 5% level. If no letters are given, the overall p-value was not statistically significant at the 5% level. HCT, hematocrit value; HB, hemoglobin level; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration.
Serum biochemical data from mice fed treatment diets for 21 d.
| Item | Control 1 | Chanoclavine 1 | SED | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| CK (IU/L) | 294 ± 69 | 437 ± 206 | 91.6 | 0.164 |
| AST (IU/L) | 75 ± 15 | 75 ± 20 | 11.1 | 0.972 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 37 ± 12 | 35 ± 6 | 6.0 | 0.748 |
| T.Bil (µmol/L)2 | 1.8 ± 0.4 a | 0.9 ± 0.2 b | 0.2 | 0.004 |
| TP (g/L) | 54.0 ± 2.2 | 53.8 ± 2.0 | 1.4 | 0.886 |
| ALB (g/L) | 33.2 ± 0.8 | 33.0 ± 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.786 |
| Globulin (g/L) | 20.8 ± 2.9 | 20.0 ± 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.616 |
| A/G | 1.622 ± 0.230 | 1.660 ± 0.178 | 0.1 | 0.787 |
| CRN (µmol/L) | 14.0 ± 2.8 | 17.0 ± 5.8 | 2.9 | 0.328 |
| Na (mmol/L) | 146 ± 2 | 146 ± 1 | 0.9 | 0.829 |
| K (mmol/L) | 15.0 ± 1.4 | 15.3 ± 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.700 |
| Cl (mmol/L) | 103 ± 1 | 105 ± 1 | 0.6 | 0.101 |
|
| ||||
| CK (IU/L) | 569 ± 210 | 594 ± 209 | 132.6 | 0.851 |
| AST (IU/L) | 110 ± 20 | 121 ± 17 | 11.7 | 0.366 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 31 ± 5 | 39 ± 9 | 4.5 | 0.126 |
| T.Bil (µmol/L) 2 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.108 |
| TP (g/L) | 54.8 ± 1.1 b | 57.8 ± 2.3 a | 1.1 | 0.029 |
| ALB (g/L) | 36.6 ± 1.1 b | 38.8 ± 1.5 a | 0.8 | 0.030 |
| Globulin (g/L) | 18.2 ± 0.8 | 19.0 ± 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.347 |
| A/G | 2.015 ± 0.140 | 2.053 ± 0.181 | 0.1 | 0.721 |
| CRN (µmol/L) | 17.0 ± 0.7 | 16.8 ± 3.7 | 1.7 | 0.908 |
| Na (mmol/L) | 148 ± 1 | 148 ± 4 | 1.8 | 0.913 |
| K (mmol/L) | 12.4 ± 1.0 | 12.8 ± 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.682 |
| Cl (mmol/L) | 106 ± 1 | 106 ± 2 | 0.9 | 0.838 |
1 Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 5). Fisher’s least significant difference was used to compare treatment means. Two means that have no letter in common are statistically different at the 5% level. If no letters are given, the overall p-value was not statistically significant at the 5% level. 2 When total bilirubin (T. Bil) was below the detection limit it was assigned a value of half the detection limit (0.5 µmol/L). CK, creatine kinase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; CRN, creatinine.
Absolute organ weight data (g) from mice fed treatment diets for 21 d.
| Brain 1 | Heart 1 | Kidneys 1 | Liver 1 | Spleen 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Control | 0.467 ± 0.017 | 0.181 ± 0.011 | 0.512 ± 0.019 a | 1.832 ± 0.129 | 0.135 ± 0.029 |
| Chanoclavine | 0.453 ± 0.021 | 0.176 ± 0.019 | 0.441 ± 0.033 b | 1.656 ± 0.183 | 0.126 ± 0.017 |
| SED | 0.012 | 0.010 | 0.017 | 0.100 | 0.015 |
| 0.269 | 0.623 | 0.003 | 0.117 | 0.579 | |
|
| |||||
| Control | 0.457 ± 0.020 | 0.167 ± 0.012 | 0.355 ± 0.017 | 1.384 ± 0.203 | 0.146 ± 0.028 |
| Chanoclavine | 0.466 ± 0.010 | 0.155 ± 0.006 | 0.328 ± 0.029 | 1.280 ± 0.093 | 0.132 ± 0.020 |
| SED | 0.010 | 0.006 | 0.015 | 0.100 | 0.016 |
| 0.385 | 0.086 | 0.117 | 0.328 | 0.420 |
1 Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 5). Fisher’s least significant difference was used to compare treatment means. Two means that have no letter in common are statistically different at the 5% level. If no letters are given, the overall p-value was not statistically significant at the 5% level.
Relative organ weight data (% of bodyweight) from mice fed treatment diets for 21 d.
| Brain 1 | Heart 1 | Kidneys 1 | Liver 1 | Spleen 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Control | 1.439 ± 0.039 | 0.559 ± 0.041 | 1.578 ± 0.079 a | 5.638 ± 0.259 | 0.417 ± 0.097 |
| Chanoclavine | 1.500 ± 0.110 | 0.586 ± 0.090 | 1.456 ± 0.023 b | 5.458 ± 0.251 | 0.417 ± 0.046 |
| SED | 0.052 | 0.044 | 0.037 | 0.161 | 0.048 |
| 0.280 | 0.555 | 0.011 | 0.298 | 0.999 | |
|
| |||||
| Control | 1.671 ± 0.136 | 0.610 ± 0.037 | 1.296 ± 0.059 | 5.030 ± 0.510 | 0.530 ± 0.090 |
| Chanoclavine | 1.775 ± 0.049 | 0.592 ± 0.031 | 1.250 ± 0.101 | 4.873 ± 0.322 | 0.504 ± 0.074 |
| SED | 0.065 | 0.022 | 0.052 | 0.270 | 0.052 |
| 0.147 | 0.439 | 0.404 | 0.578 | 0.626 |
1 Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 5). Fisher’s least significant difference was used to compare treatment means. Two means that have no letter in common are statistically different at the 5% level. If no letters are given, the overall p-value was not statistically significant at the 5% level.