| Literature DB >> 31052432 |
Fei Sun1,2,3, Ting-Ting Li4,5,6, Haitao Ren7, Qian Jiang8,9, Hao-Kai Peng10,11, Qi Lin12, Ching-Wen Lou13,14,15,16, Jia-Horng Lin17,18,19,20,21,22.
Abstract
This study aims to produce polypropylene (PP)/titanium dioxide (TiO2) melt-blown membranes for oil/water separation and photocatalysis. PP and different contents of TiO2 are melt-blended to prepare master batches using a single screw extruder. The master batches are then fabricated into PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes. The thermal properties of the master batches are analyzed using differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis, and their particle dispersion and melt-blown membrane morphology are evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. TiO2 loaded on melt-blown membranes is confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The oil/water separation ability of the melt-blown membranes is evaluated to examine the influence of TiO2 content. Results show that the thermal stability and photocatalytic effect of the membranes increase with TiO2 content. TiO2 shows a good dispersion in the PP membranes. After 3 wt.% TiO2 addition, crystallinity increases by 6.4%, thermal decomposition temperature increases by 25 °C compared with pure PP membranes. The resultant PP/TiO2 melt-blown membrane has a good morphology, and better hydrophobicity even in acetone solution or 6 h ultraviolet irradiation, and a high oil flux of about 15,000 L·m-2·h-1. Moreover, the membranes have stabilized oil/water separation efficiency after being repeatedly used. The proposed melt-blown membranes are suitable for mass production for separating oil from water in massively industrial dyeing wastewater.Entities:
Keywords: melt-blowing process; membranes; oil/water separation; photocatalysis; polypropylene
Year: 2019 PMID: 31052432 PMCID: PMC6572468 DOI: 10.3390/polym11050775
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
The Processing parameters of melt-blending.
| Parameter | Screw 1 Temperature (°C) | Screw 2 Temperature (°C) | Screw 3 Temperature (°C) | Nozzle Temperature (°C) | Screw Speed (r/min) | Pelletized Speed (r/min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 180 | 200 | 190 | 170 | 21 | 32 |
Figure 1The melt-blowing process of polypropylene/titanium dioxide (PP/TiO2) melt-blown membranes.
Figure 2Thermal properties of PP/TiO2 master batch. (a) DSC thermograms of first cooling processes; (b) DSC thermograms of second heating; (c) TG curves of PP/TiO2; (d) DTG curves of PP/TiO2.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results of melt-blown membranes.
| Sample | Tmc (°C) | Tg (°C) | Tm (°C) | Xc (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP/TiO2-0 | 113.60 | 41.50 | 164.90 | 36.29 |
| PP/TiO2-1 | 115.00 | 42.40 | 162.50 | 37.68 |
| PP/TiO2-3 | 115.80 | 42.20 | 163.30 | 42.69 |
| PP/TiO2-5 | 116.00 | 42.10 | 161.90 | 40.81 |
TGA and DTG results of PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes.
| Sample Type | T0.05 (°C) | T0.5 (°C) | Tmax (°C) | Remnant Mass (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP/TiO2-0 | 349.80 | 418.13 | 438.60 | 0.02 |
| PP/TiO2-1 | 350.70 | 421.30 | 440.40 | 0.84 |
| PP/TiO2-3 | 385.50 | 450.40 | 462.60 | 2.95 |
| PP/TiO2-5 | 399.30 | 456.60 | 466.60 | 5.11 |
Figure 3The fracture surfaces of PP/TiO2 hot-press film (a) F-PP/TiO2-0, (b) F-PP/TiO2-1, (c) F-PP/TiO2-3, (d) F-PP/TiO2-5; the SEM images of PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes (e) M-PP/TiO2-0, (f) M-PP/TiO2-1, (g) M-PP/TiO2-3 (h) M-PP/TiO2-5, and the fiber diameter of PP/TiO2 nonwovens (i) M-PP/TiO2-0, (j) M-PP/TiO2-1, (k) M-PP/TiO2-3, and (l) M-PP/TiO2-5.
Diameter distribution of melt-blown membranes as related to the content of TiO2.
| Sample | N Total | Mean | Standard Deviation | Sum (μm) | Minimum (μm) | Median (μm) | Maximum (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M-PP/TiO2-0 | 88 | 1.99 | 0.54 | 175.37 | 0.94 | 1.86 | 3.56 |
| M-PP/TiO2-1 | 104 | 4.93 | 1.93 | 512.80 | 2.46 | 4.43 | 9.72 |
| M-PP/TiO2-3 | 99 | 5.34 | 2.26 | 529.08 | 1.74 | 5.22 | 9.91 |
| M-PP/TiO2-5 | 93 | 5.78 | 1.95 | 537.76 | 1.74 | 6.09 | 9.84 |
Figure 4X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) TiO2; (b) M-PP/TiO2-0; (c) M-PP/TiO2-3; and (d) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of M-PP/TiO2 membranes.
Figure 5(a) Contact angle of M-PP/TiO2 (m:n represent acetone/water (v/v)); (b) the oil and water drip on the melt-blown membrane (the red circle is kerosene, blue drop is water), and (c) the surface tension of different acetone solution.
The contact angle of acetone solution at PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes.
| Acetone:Water ( | M-PP/TiO2-0 | M-PP/TiO2-1 | M-PP/TiO2-3 | M-PP/TiO2-5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0:5 | 140 | 138 | 134 | 132 |
| 1:4 | 116 | 130 | 132 | 132 |
| 2:3 | 109 | 116 | 120 | 124 |
| 3:2 | 20 | 59 | 76 | 98 |
Figure 6The oil-water separation process of M-PP/TiO2.
Figure 7(a) Oil/water separation efficiency (ηs) of melt-blown membranes as related to TiO2 content, (b) oil/water separation efficiency of M-PP/TiO2-3 as related to recycle numbers, and (c) gravity-driven kerosene flux of melt-blown membranes as related to TiO2 content.
Figure 8(a) The absorbance of rhodamine B along with time and (b) FTIR spectrum of kerosene photocatalysis PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes.