| Literature DB >> 31052248 |
Jiajia Guo1, Dan Zhang2, Chao Yu3, Ling Yao4, Zhuo Chen5, Yanduo Tao6, Weiguo Cao7.
Abstract
Incarvillea compacta Maxim is a traditional Tibetan plant widely used to treat rheumatic pain and bruises. We conducted qualitative analyses by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and quantitative analyses of the total phenols, flavonoids, and alkaloids content of different extracts of I. compacta Maxim. Antioxidant and analgesic activity were analyzed. The results showed that the methanol extract had the highest content of the various ingredients. A total of 25 constituents were identified, of which compounds 1-23 were found for the first time in this plant. The water extract had the highest capacity to clear free radicals in the antioxidant test. The water extract had dose-dependent analgesic effects in the first and second phase in a formalin test. The latency of pain from a hot-plate test was augmented by the water extract when the dose was greater than or equal to 30 g/kg. The water extract significantly decreased the amount of writhing in a dose-dependent manner compared with the control group in the acetic acid-induced writhing test. These results showed that I. compacta Maxim is a new antioxidant and analgesic agent, and this study provides information on its ingredients for further study.Entities:
Keywords: LC-MS; Tibetan plant; analgesia; anti-oxidation; formalin test
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31052248 PMCID: PMC6539126 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24091692
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
TPs, TFs, TAs content of ICM extracted with different solvents.
| Solvents | Total Phenols | Total Flavonoids | Total Alkaloids |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water | 22.00 ± 0.80c | 29.24 ± 0.09c | 1.05 ± 0.02c |
| Methanol | 29.24 ± 0.04b | 49.07 ± 0.25b | 5.01 ± 0.07b |
| Acetone | 11.28 ± 0.05a | 9.11 ± 0.08a | 2.43 ± 0.02a |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation; different superscript lowercase letters denote statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Identification of the compounds in the mICM by LC-ESI-QTOF-MS-MS.
| Peak | Rt (min) | Molecular | [M + H]+ | [M − H]− | Error (ppm) | MS/MS Fragments | Proposed Compound | Reference | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.88 | C9H10O5 | 197.04555 | −2.1 | 182.024,167.0005 | Syringic acid | [ | Phenolic acids | |
| 2 | 5.58 | C7H6O3 | 137.02442 | 0.4 | 108.0002, 92.0266 | [ | Phenolic acids | ||
| 3 | 2.02 | C7H12O6 | 191.05611 | −1.1 | 173.0461,127.0410 | Quinic acid | [ | Phenolic acids | |
| 4 | 2.13 | C13H16O9 | 315.0721 | 0.7 | 153.0568, 59.0159 | Protocatechuic acid hexoside | [ | Phenolic acids | |
| 5 | 12.54 | C27H30O16 | 609.14611 | −0.5 | 301.0347 (47.96) | Rutin | [ | Flavonoid | |
| 6 | 18.12 | C27H30O15 | 593.15119 | −0.1 | 285.0395 | Kaempferol-3- | [ | Flavonoid | |
| 7 | 14.7 | C21H20O12 | 463.0882 | −2 | 301.0345 | Quercetin-3- | [ | Flavonoid | |
| 8 | 20.43 | C21H20O11 | 447.09329 | −2.4 | 285.0384 | Kaempferol-3- | [ | Flavonoid | |
| 9 | 21.87 | C21H20O10 | 431.09837 | −5 | 269.0424 | Apigenin-7- | [ | Flavonoid | |
| 10 | 2 | C27H30O16 | 609.1461 | −0.5 | 301.0347 | Quercetin-3-glucoside-7- | [ | Flavonoid | |
| 11 | 8.31 | C20H19NO5 | 354.1336 | −1 | 206.0804,188.0694 | Protopine | [ | Alkaloid | |
| 12 | 12.54 | C27H30O16 | 609.1458 | −0.5 | 301.0347,271.0235 | Quercetin-3- | [ | Flavonoid | |
| 13 | 19.34 | C16H12O7 | 317.9656 | −0.4 | 317.0645,302.0421 | Isorhamnetin | [ | Flavonoid | |
| 14 | 12.59 | C15H10O7 | 303.0497 | −0.7 | 303.0484,285.0411 | Quercetin | [ | Flavonoid | |
| 15 | 14.73 | C21H20O12 | 465.1028 | −1.2 | 303.0485 | Quercetin-3-glucoside | [ | Flavonoid | |
| 16 | 2.37 | C4H6O5 | 133.01425 | 1.2 | 115.0038,71.0155, 51.0191 | Malic Acid | [ | Organic acid | |
| 17 | 2.61 | C6H8O7 | 303.04993 | 191.01973 | −2 | 111.0088,87.0089, 59.0154 | Citric acid | [ | Organic acid |
| 18 | 6.36 | C9H6O4 | 177.01933 | −0.7 | 149.0281, 133.0274, 105.0337, 89.0396 | Esculetin | [ | Coumarins | |
| 19 | 1.69 | C11H21NO | 184.16959 | 0.6 | 184.1691,166.1585,107.0851 | Incarvilline | [ | Alkaloid | |
| 20 | 2.56 | C10H11NO2 | 178.0863 | 0.7 | 162.0543,132.0797,118.0643,117.0568 | Plantagonine | [ | Alkaloid | |
| 21 | 10.17 | C16H24O9 | 359.1348 | −0.7 | 197.0810,153.0922 | 8-Epideoxyloganic acid | [ | Iridoids | |
| 22 | 11.5 | C9H8O3 | 163.04007 | 0.3 | 135.0455, 89.0397 | Coumaric acid | [ | Phenolic acids | |
| 23 | 3.6 | C7H6O4 | 153.01933 | 0.3 | 109.0295,81.0366, 53.0414 | Protocatechuic acid | [ | Phenolic acids | |
| 24 | 6.59 | C9H8O4 | 179.03498 | 0.9 | 136.0514 | Caffeic acid | [ | Phenolic acids | |
| 25 | 38.26 | C15H10O5 | 269.04555 | −3.4 | 117.0351, 151.0046 | Apigenin | [ | Flavonoid |
Figure 1MS/MS spectra in positive mode of protopine (a) and quercetin (b).
Figure 2Antioxidant activity assays of ICM extract. (a) DPPH radical scavenging activity, (b) ABTS radical scavenging activity, (c) reducing power, (d) β-carotene/linoleic acid cooxidation activity.
Figure 3Analgesic effects of wICM in formalin test. Data are expressed as the means ± SD. * shows p < 0.05 compared with the control group; ** shows p < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 4Antinociceptive effects of wICM in hot-plate test. Data are expressed as the means ± SD. * shows p < 0.05 compared with the control group; ** shows p < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 5The effects of wICM on mice in acetic acid writhing test. Data are expressed as the means ± SD. * shows p < 0.05 compared with the control group; ** shows p < 0.01 compared with the control group.
The analgesic rate of wICM in the acetic acid test.
| Groups | Analgesic Rate (%) |
|---|---|
| Low-dose | 25.05% |
| Mid-dose | 32.79% |
| High-dose | 58.20% |