| Literature DB >> 31052170 |
Agathe Chouët1, Sylvie Chevallier2, Romain Fleurisson3, Catherine Loisel4, Laurence Dubreil5.
Abstract
An innovative methodology based on non-destructive observation by using harmonic generation microscopy is proposed for detection and location of starch granules and oil in a fried starchy matrix and topography analysis of food products. Specific fluorescent probes were used to label the main biochemical components of the starchy fried matrix, namely starch and oil. Fluorescence of starch and oil respectively stained with Safranin O and Nile red was observed from non-linear microscopy. By using sequential scanning and specific emission filters, it was possible to merge fluorescence and harmonic generation signals. Second harmonic generation (SHG) generated by starch granules was superposed with safranin fluorescence, whereas third harmonic generation (THG), not restricted to the superposition with Nile red fluorescent signal, was used to investigate the topography of the fried product. By these experiments, starch granule mapping and topography of the starchy fried product were obtained without any destructive preparation of the sample. This label-free approach using harmonic generation microscopy is a very promising methodology for microstructure investigation of a large panel of starchy food products.Entities:
Keywords: SHG; THG; harmonic generation; multiphoton microscopy; starch granule; topography
Year: 2019 PMID: 31052170 PMCID: PMC6540293 DOI: 10.3390/s19092024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Stain fluorescence emission wavelengths.
| Stain | Emission Wavelength | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minima (nm) | Maxima (nm) | ||
| Safranin O | 530 | 550 | [ |
| Nile red | 638 | 768 | [ |
Multiphoton settings used in presented work, specifications of filters are provided in brackets with central wavelength and bandwidth.
| Constituent | Excitation (nm) | Detection Channel Emission (nm) | Depth (µm) | Number of Images (Step) | Nyquist in Depth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue | Green | Yellow | Red | |||||
|
| 820 | SHG | 26.5 | 53 | Yes | |||
| (49.68 mW) | (FF01-415/10-25) | |||||||
| 1040 | Safranin | |||||||
| (84 mW) | (FF03-525/50−25) | |||||||
|
| 820 | SHG | 112.5 | 225 | Yes | |||
| (86.4 mW) | (FF01-415/10−25) | |||||||
| 1040 | Auto fluo. | |||||||
| (135 mW) | (FF03-575/25−25) | |||||||
|
| 1240 | THG | 39 | 39 | No | |||
| (539.5 mW) | (FF01-415/10−25) | |||||||
| 1040 | Nile Red | |||||||
| (34.5mW) | (FF01-629/56−25) | |||||||
|
| 1240 | THG | 357 | 357 | No | |||
| (539.5 mW) | (FF01-415/10−25) | |||||||
| 1040 | Nile Red | |||||||
| (30 mW) | (FF01-629/56−25) | |||||||
|
| 1240 | THG | SHG | 224 | 224 | No | ||
| (380.14 mW) | (FF01-415/10−25) | (FF01-629/56−25) | ||||||
| 1040 | SHG | Auto fluo. | ||||||
| (150 mW) | (FF03-525/50−25) | (FF03-575/25−25) | ||||||
Figure 1(a–c) Observation of native starch granule stained with Safranin-O: (a) Safranin-O fluorescence signal (green); (b) second harmonic generation (SHG) signal (blue); (c) superposition of SHG and fluorescence signals; (d) comparison SHG/fluo starch granule detection; (e–g) Observation of gelatinized starch granule stained with Safranin-O: (e) Safranin-O fluorescence signal (green); (f) absence of SHG in gelatinized starch; (g) superposition of (d) and (e). Scale bar 25 µm. See Table 2 for acquisition parameters.
Figure 2Observation of starch granules embedded in a matrix: (a) matrix auto fluorescence signal (yellow); (b) SHG signal (blue); (c) superposition of SHG and auto fluorescence matrix signals (530 µm × 530 µm × 112 µm). See Table 2 for acquisition parameters.
Figure 3Observation of emulsion lipid droplets: (a) third harmonic generation (THG) signal (blue) from emulsion without previous staining; (b) endogenous fluorescence; (c) merge of (a) and (b); (d) THG signal (blue) from emulsion with previous staining with Nile red; (e) red fluorescence from oil stained by Nile red; (f) superposition of THG and fluorescence signals. Scale bar 25 µm. See Table 2 for acquisition parameters.
Figure 4Observation of oil in the fried matrix: (a) Nile red fluorescence (red); (b) THG signal (blue); (c) superposition of THG and fluorescence signals (530 µm × 530 µm × 357 µm). See Table 2 for acquisition parameters.
Figure 5Observation of the matrix: (a) THG signal; (b) matrix auto-fluorescence signal; (c) SHG signal; (d) superposition of THG, SHG and matrix auto fluorescence signals; (e) 3D imaging of THG topography (530 µm × 530 µm × 224 µm). See Table 2 for acquisition parameters.