Helen M Faddy1,2, Jesse J Fryk1, Roy A Hall3, Paul R Young3, Stefan Reichenberg4, Frank Tolksdorf4, Chryslain Sumian5, Ute Gravemann6, Axel Seltsam6, Denese C Marks1. 1. Research and Development, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 2. School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 3. Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 4. Macopharma International GmbH, Langen, Germany. 5. Macopharma, Tourcoing, France. 6. German Red Cross Blood Service NSTOB, Springe, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Yellow fever virus (YFV) is endemic to tropical and subtropical areas in South America and Africa, and is currently a major public health threat in Brazil. Transfusion transmission of the yellow fever vaccine virus has been demonstrated, which is indicative of the potential for viral transfusion transmission. An approach to manage the potential YFV transfusion transmission risk is the use of pathogen inactivation (PI) technology systems, such as THERAFLEX MB-Plasma and THERAFLEX UV-Platelets (Macopharma). We aimed to investigate the efficacy of these PI technology systems to inactivate YFV in plasma or platelet concentrates (PCs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: YFV spiked plasma units were treated using THERAFLEX MB-Plasma system (visible light doses: 20, 40, 60, and 120 [standard] J/cm2 ) in the presence of methylene blue (approx. 0.8 μmol/L) and spiked PCs were treated using THERAFLEX UV-Platelets system (ultraviolet C doses: 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 [standard] J/cm2 ). Samples were taken before the first and after each illumination dose and tested for residual virus using a modified plaque assay. RESULTS: YFV infectivity was reduced by an average of 4.77 log or greater in plasma treated with the THERAFLEX MB-Plasma system and by 4.8 log or greater in PCs treated with THERAFLEX UV-Platelets system. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the THERAFLEX MB-Plasma and the THERAFLEX UV-Platelets systems can efficiently inactivate YFV in plasma or PCs to a similar degree as that for other arboviruses. Given the reduction levels observed in this study, these PI technology systems could be an effective option for managing YFV transfusion-transmission risk in plasma and PCs.
BACKGROUND:Yellow fever virus (YFV) is endemic to tropical and subtropical areas in South America and Africa, and is currently a major public health threat in Brazil. Transfusion transmission of the yellow fever vaccine virus has been demonstrated, which is indicative of the potential for viral transfusion transmission. An approach to manage the potential YFV transfusion transmission risk is the use of pathogen inactivation (PI) technology systems, such as THERAFLEX MB-Plasma and THERAFLEX UV-Platelets (Macopharma). We aimed to investigate the efficacy of these PI technology systems to inactivate YFV in plasma or platelet concentrates (PCs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: YFV spiked plasma units were treated using THERAFLEX MB-Plasma system (visible light doses: 20, 40, 60, and 120 [standard] J/cm2 ) in the presence of methylene blue (approx. 0.8 μmol/L) and spiked PCs were treated using THERAFLEX UV-Platelets system (ultraviolet C doses: 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 [standard] J/cm2 ). Samples were taken before the first and after each illumination dose and tested for residual virus using a modified plaque assay. RESULTS:YFV infectivity was reduced by an average of 4.77 log or greater in plasma treated with the THERAFLEX MB-Plasma system and by 4.8 log or greater in PCs treated with THERAFLEX UV-Platelets system. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the THERAFLEX MB-Plasma and the THERAFLEX UV-Platelets systems can efficiently inactivate YFV in plasma or PCs to a similar degree as that for other arboviruses. Given the reduction levels observed in this study, these PI technology systems could be an effective option for managing YFV transfusion-transmission risk in plasma and PCs.
Authors: Ángel Giménez-Richarte; Mabel Ortiz de Salazar; Cristina Arbona; María P Giménez-Richarte; Miriam Collado; Pedro L Fernández; Francisco Quiles; Carlos Clavijo; Pascual Marco; Jose-Manuel Ramos-Rincon Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 5.752
Authors: Layla Pires; Brian C Wilson; Rod Bremner; Amanda Lang; Jeremie Larouche; Ryan McDonald; Joel D Pearson; Daniel Trcka; Jeff Wrana; James Wu; Cari M Whyne Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Mathieu Gendrot; Julien Andreani; Isabelle Duflot; Manon Boxberger; Marion Le Bideau; Joel Mosnier; Priscilla Jardot; Isabelle Fonta; Clara Rolland; Hervé Bogreau; Sébastien Hutter; Bernard La Scola; Bruno Pradines Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 15.441