Literature DB >> 31050311

Use of evidence in health professions education: Attitudes, practices, barriers and supports.

Aliki Thomas1, Larry D Gruppen2, Cees van der Vleuten3, Gevorg Chilingaryan4, Fatima Amari5, Yvonne Steinert6.   

Abstract

Introduction: Health professions educators are increasingly called upon to apply an evidence-informed approach to teaching and assessment practices. There is scant empirical research exploring educators' attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers and supports to using research evidence in educational practice.
Methods: We conducted a survey of AMEE members to explore three domains related to evidence-informed health professions education: (1) attitudes; (2) practices; and (3) supports and barriers. Analyses involved descriptive statistics to characterize participants' responses per domain, exploratory factor analysis, and multivariate regression analyses.
Results: Three hundred ninety-six (∼10%) participants representing health professions educators (HPEs) and non HPEs (e.g. PhDs) and different roles (e.g. teacher, administrator) completed the survey. Attitudes toward evidence-informed HPE were generally favorable. Several barriers preclude participants from engaging in evidence-informed approaches to health professions education (HPE). Discussion: This study provides preliminary evidence on the attitudes toward and perceived barriers and supports of research use in HPE from different groups of HP educators, clinicians, and administrators. The findings for each of the three domains require additional exploration using qualitative methodologies.
Conclusion: Targeted interventions designed to increase the uptake of research in HPE should consider different stakeholder groups' perceptions regarding these approaches, current vs. best practices, and factors that may impede evidence-informed approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31050311     DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1605161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  3 in total

1.  Utilization of evidence-based tools and medical education literature by Canadian postgraduate program directors in the teaching and assessment of the CanMEDS roles.

Authors:  Asif Doja; Kaylee Eady; Andrew Warren; Lorne Wiesenfeld; Hilary Writer
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-04-30

2.  Rethinking implementation science for health professions education: A manifesto for change.

Authors:  Aliki Thomas; Rachel H Ellaway
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2021-11-10

3.  Barriers and facilitators to program directors' use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Asif Doja; Carolina Lavin Venegas; Lindsay Cowley; Lorne Wiesenfeld; Hilary Writer; Chantalle Clarkin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.