Literature DB >> 31050144

Comparison of the ecology and evolution of plants with a generalist bird pollination system between continents and islands worldwide.

Stefan Abrahamczyk1.   

Abstract

Thousands of plant species worldwide are dependent on birds for pollination. While the ecology and evolution of interactions between specialist nectarivorous birds and the plants they pollinate is relatively well understood, very little is known on pollination by generalist birds. The flower characters of this pollination syndrome are clearly defined but the geographical distribution patterns, habitat preferences and ecological factors driving the evolution of generalist-bird-pollinated plant species have never been analysed. Herein I provide an overview, compare the distribution of character states for plants growing on continents with those occurring on oceanic islands and discuss the environmental factors driving the evolution of both groups. The ecological niches of generalist-bird-pollinated plant species differ: on continents these plants mainly occur in habitats with pronounced climatic seasonality whereas on islands generalist-bird-pollinated plant species mainly occur in evergreen forests. Further, on continents generalist-bird-pollinated plant species are mostly shrubs and other large woody species producing numerous flowers with a self-incompatible reproductive system, while on islands they are mostly small shrubs producing fewer flowers and are self-compatible. This difference in character states indicates that diverging ecological factors are likely to have driven the evolution of these groups: on continents, plants that evolved generalist bird pollination escape from pollinator groups that tend to maintain self-pollination by installing feeding territories in single flowering trees or shrubs, such as social bees or specialist nectarivorous birds. This pattern is more pronounced in the New compared to the Old World. By contrast, on islands, plants evolved generalist bird pollination as an adaptation to birds as a reliable pollinator group, a pattern previously known from plants pollinated by specialist nectarivorous birds in tropical mountain ranges. Additionally, I discuss the evolutionary origins of bird pollination systems in comparison to systems involving specialist nectarivorous birds and reconstruct the bird pollination system of Hawaii, which may represent an intermediate between a specialist and generalist bird pollination system. I also discuss the interesting case of Australia, where it is difficult to distinguish between specialist and generalist bird pollination systems.
© 2019 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; Hawaiian honeycreepers; breeding system; climatic seasonality; elevation; flowering phenology; honeyeaters; hummingbird; sunbirds

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31050144     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  4 in total

1.  Generalist birds outperform specialist sunbirds as pollinators of an African Aloe.

Authors:  Carolina Diller; Miguel Castañeda-Zárate; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Ecological fitting is a sufficient driver of tight interactions between sunbirds and ornithophilous plants.

Authors:  Štěpán Janeček; Kryštof Chmel; Guillermo Uceda Gómez; Petra Janečková; Eliška Chmelová; Zuzana Sejfová; Francis Luma Ewome
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Influence of plant reproductive systems on the evolution of hummingbird pollination.

Authors:  Stefan Abrahamczyk; Maximilian Weigend; Katrin Becker; Lea Sophie Dannenberg; Judith Eberz; Nayara Atella-Hödtke; Bastian Steudel
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Plants are visited by more pollinator species than pollination syndromes predicted in an oceanic island community.

Authors:  Xiangping Wang; Meihong Wen; Xin Qian; Nancai Pei; Dianxiang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.