Literature DB >> 31050105

Understanding variants of uncertain significance in the era of multigene panels: Through the eyes of the patient.

Chloe Reuter1,2, Nicolette Chun3, Mitchel Pariani1, Andrea Hanson-Kahn4,5.   

Abstract

Variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) are often disclosed to patients despite ambiguous association with disease risk and lack of clinical actionability. It is important to understand how patients understand a VUS result, but few studies have assessed this. Our qualitative study explored patient recall, reaction to, and interpretation of a VUS in the context of multigene panels. We conducted 11 semi-structured phone interviews with adults who had a VUS identified on multigene panel testing in a hereditary oncology clinic, with questions focusing on the VUS result, personal and family history, and motivations for and expectations of genetic testing. Transcripts were coded iteratively, using both deductive and inductive codes. Overall, participants usually recalled that they had a VUS, despite variation in the vocabulary used. Participants responded both emotionally and intellectually to receiving information about having a VUS, which was often a result of their expectations and motivations prior to testing. Overall, participants understood the lack of clinical significance of a VUS, yet often interpreted the etiologic significance of a VUS within the context of the personal and family history. Our study provides insight into a process by which patients translate uncertain genetic testing results into a construct that fits within their current belief framework and which may be facilitated by a genetic counselor.
© 2019 National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer genetics; genetic counseling; genetic testing; oncology; qualitative research; uncertainty; variant of uncertain significance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31050105     DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  8 in total

Review 1.  Multidisciplinary approaches for elucidating genetics and molecular pathogenesis of urinary tract malformations.

Authors:  Kamal Khan; Dina F Ahram; Yangfan P Liu; Rik Westland; Rosemary V Sampogna; Nicholas Katsanis; Erica E Davis; Simone Sanna-Cherchi
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 2.  Experiences of individuals with a variant of uncertain significance on genetic testing for hereditary cancer risks: a mixed method systematic review.

Authors:  Danielle Gould; Rachel Walker; Grace Makari-Judson; Memnun Seven
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-07-12

3.  A Further Case of Larsen's Syndrome: Clinical and Genotypic Challenges in Diagnosis.

Authors:  Veronica Arora; Swasti Pal; Samarth Kulshreshtha; Ishwar C Verma
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2020-10-19

4.  Cancer patients' understandings of genetic variants of uncertain significance in clinical care.

Authors:  Yael Amano; Aviad Raz; Stefan Timmermans; Shiri Shkedi-Rafid
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-05-26

5.  Male Infertility Diagnosis: Improvement of Genetic Analysis Performance by the Introduction of Pre-Diagnostic Genes in a Next-Generation Sequencing Custom-Made Panel.

Authors:  Vincenza Precone; Rossella Cannarella; Stefano Paolacci; Gian Maria Busetto; Tommaso Beccari; Liborio Stuppia; Gerolamo Tonini; Alessandra Zulian; Giuseppe Marceddu; Aldo E Calogero; Matteo Bertelli
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  "Is that something that should concern me?": a qualitative exploration of parent understanding of their child's genomic test results.

Authors:  Dana Watnick; Jacqueline A Odgis; Sabrina A Suckiel; Katie M Gallagher; Nehama Teitelman; Katherine E Donohue; Bruce D Gelb; Eimear E Kenny; Melissa P Wasserstein; Carol R Horowitz; Siobhan M Dolan; Laurie J Bauman
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2021-02-03

Review 7.  Receiving results of uncertain clinical relevance from population genetic screening: systematic review & meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Faye Johnson; Fiona Ulph; Rhona MacLeod; Kevin W Southern
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.351

8.  Fragmented responsibility: views of Israeli HCPs regarding patient recontact following variant reclassification.

Authors:  Alma Levin Fridman; Aviad Raz; Stefan Timmermans; Shiri Shkedi-Rafid
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-10-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.