L L Snyder1, J M Stafford2, D Dabelea3, J Divers2, G Imperatore4, J Law5, J M Lawrence6, C Pihoker7, E J Mayer-Davis8. 1. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Nemours Children's Health System, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. 3. Lifecourse Epidemiology of Adiposity and Diabetes (LEAD) Center, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. 4. Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 6. Department of Research and Evaluation, Division of Epidemiologic Research, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA. 7. Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Seattle's Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA. 8. Gillings School of Global Public Health, Departments of Nutrition and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
AIM: To examine the distribution and association of sociodemographic, adherence, and barriers-to-care factors in relation to glycaemic control within insulin regimens in US children with Type 1 diabetes in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. METHODS: Self- or parent-reported data from 1095 children with Type 1 diabetes aged 10-17 years were collected on insulin regimen, sociodemographics, diabetes self-management, diabetes-related family conflict and barriers to care. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified poor glycaemic control correlates within each insulin regimen. RESULTS: Participants included 694 children on insulin pump therapy, 188 receiving basal-bolus injections, and 213 on a mixed insulin regimen. Of these, 28.5%, 45.2% and 51.2%, respectively, had poor glycaemic control [HbA1c ≥ 80 mmol/mol (9.5%)]. Family conflict between parent and child regarding diabetes management was the only factor significantly associated with poor glycaemic control in all insulin regimens (insulin pump, P≤ 0.0001; basal-bolus injections, P=0.0002; mixed insulin regimen, P=0.0103). For children on insulin pump, poor control was significantly associated with non-white race (P=0.0008), living in multiple households (P=0.0331), having Medicaid insurance (P=0.0090), and decreased insulin adherence (P<0.0001). For children on a mixed insulin regimen, living in multiple households (P=0.0256) and not spending enough time with healthcare provider (P=0.0058) correlated with poor control. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of US children with Type 1 diabetes had poor glycaemic control, especially those not using an insulin pump. Early identification of children with risk factors associated with poor glycaemic control within insulin regimens and addressing diabetes-related family conflict may allow interventions to improve diabetes management.
AIM: To examine the distribution and association of sociodemographic, adherence, and barriers-to-care factors in relation to glycaemic control within insulin regimens in US children with Type 1 diabetes in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. METHODS: Self- or parent-reported data from 1095 children with Type 1 diabetes aged 10-17 years were collected on insulin regimen, sociodemographics, diabetes self-management, diabetes-related family conflict and barriers to care. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified poor glycaemic control correlates within each insulin regimen. RESULTS: Participants included 694 children on insulin pump therapy, 188 receiving basal-bolus injections, and 213 on a mixed insulin regimen. Of these, 28.5%, 45.2% and 51.2%, respectively, had poor glycaemic control [HbA1c ≥ 80 mmol/mol (9.5%)]. Family conflict between parent and child regarding diabetes management was the only factor significantly associated with poor glycaemic control in all insulin regimens (insulin pump, P≤ 0.0001; basal-bolus injections, P=0.0002; mixed insulin regimen, P=0.0103). For children on insulin pump, poor control was significantly associated with non-white race (P=0.0008), living in multiple households (P=0.0331), having Medicaid insurance (P=0.0090), and decreased insulin adherence (P<0.0001). For children on a mixed insulin regimen, living in multiple households (P=0.0256) and not spending enough time with healthcare provider (P=0.0058) correlated with poor control. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of US children with Type 1 diabetes had poor glycaemic control, especially those not using an insulin pump. Early identification of children with risk factors associated with poor glycaemic control within insulin regimens and addressing diabetes-related family conflict may allow interventions to improve diabetes management.
Authors: Kellee M Miller; Nicole C Foster; Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Stephanie N DuBose; Linda A DiMeglio; David M Maahs; William V Tamborlane Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Maria J Redondo; Crystal G Connor; Katrina J Ruedy; Roy W Beck; Craig Kollman; Jamie R Wood; Bruce Buckingham; Georgeanna J Klingensmith; Janet Silverstein; William V Tamborlane Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: F J Cameron; T C Skinner; C E de Beaufort; H Hoey; P G F Swift; H Aanstoot; J Aman; P Martul; F Chiarelli; D Daneman; T Danne; H Dorchy; E A Kaprio; F Kaufman; M Kocova; H B Mortensen; P R Njølstad; M Phillip; K J Robertson; E J Schoenle; T Urakami; M Vanelli; R W Ackermann; S E Skovlund Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2008-02-19 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Richard F Hamman; Ronny A Bell; Dana Dabelea; Ralph B D'Agostino; Lawrence Dolan; Giuseppina Imperatore; Jean M Lawrence; Barbara Linder; Santica M Marcovina; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Catherine Pihoker; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Sharon Saydah Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jessica T Markowitz; Deborah A Butler; Lisa K Volkening; Jeanne E Antisdel; Barbara J Anderson; Lori M B Laffel Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-12-23 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Dana Dabelea; Katherine A Sauder; Elizabeth T Jensen; Amy K Mottl; Alyssa Huang; Catherine Pihoker; Richard F Hamman; Jean Lawrence; Lawrence M Dolan; Ralph D' Agostino; Lynne Wagenknecht; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Santica M Marcovina Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 6.499
Authors: Kara R Mizokami-Stout; Zoey Li; Nicole C Foster; Viral Shah; Grazia Aleppo; Janet B McGill; Richard Pratley; Elena Toschi; Lynn Ang; Rodica Pop-Busui Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Daria Igudesman; Beth A Reboussin; Katherine J Souris; Catherine Pihoker; Lawrence Dolan; Jean M Lawrence; Sharon Saydah; Dana Dabelea; Santica Marcovina; Noémie Clouet-Foraison; Faisal S Malik; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2022-07-22 Impact factor: 4.061
Authors: Katherine A Sauder; Jeanette M Stafford; Natalie S The; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Joan Thomas; Jean M Lawrence; Grace Kim; Karen R Siegel; Elizabeth T Jensen; Amy S Shah; Ralph B D'Agostino; Dana Dabelea Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2020-08-23 Impact factor: 3.409