Borek Foldyna1,2, Parastou Eslami3, Jan-Erik Scholtz3,4, Kristin Baltrusaitis5, Michael T Lu3, Joseph M Massaro5, Ralph B D'Agostino5, Maros Ferencik3,6, Hugo J W L Aerts7,8, Christopher J O'Donnell9,10, Udo Hoffmann3. 1. Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. bfoldyna@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands. bfoldyna@mgh.harvard.edu. 3. Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. 4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. 5. Department of Mathematics, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 7. Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands. 8. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 9. The Framingham Heart Study of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Framingham, MA, USA. 10. Cardiology Section, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between directly measured density and morphology of coronary artery calcium (CAC) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, using computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Framingham Heart Study (FHS) participants with CAC in noncontrast cardiac CT (2002-2005) were included and followed until 2016. Participants with known CVD or uninterpretable CT scans were excluded. We assessed and correlated (Spearman) CAC density, CAC volume, and the number of calcified segments. Moreover, we counted morphology features including shape (cylindrical, spherical, semi-tubular, and spotty), location (bifurcation, facing pericardium, or facing myocardium), and boundary regularity. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, we associated all CAC characteristics with CVD events (CVD-death, myocardial infarction, stroke). RESULTS: Among 1330 included participants (57.8 ± 11.7 years; 63% male), 73 (5.5%) experienced CVD events in a median follow-up of 9.1 (7.8-10.1) years. CAC density correlated strongly with CAC volume (Spearman's ρ = 0.75; p < 0.001) and lower number of calcified segments (ρ = - 0.86; p < 0.001; controlled for CAC volume). In the survival analysis, CAC density was associated with CVD events independent of Framingham risk score (HR (per SD) = 2.09; 95%CI, 1.30-3.34; p = 0.002) but not after adjustment for CAC volume (p = 0.648). The extent of spherically shaped and pericardially sided calcifications was associated with fewer CVD events accounting for the number of calcified segments (HR (per count) = 0.55; 95%CI, 0.31-0.98; p = 0.042 and HR = 0.66; 95%CI, 0.45-0.98; p = 0.039, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Directly measured CAC density does not predict CVD events due to the strong correlation with CAC volume. The spherical shape and pericardial-sided location of CAC are associated with fewer CVD events and may represent morphological features related to stable coronary plaques. KEY POINTS: • Coronary calcium density may not be independently associated with cardiovascular events. • Coronary calcium density correlates strongly with calcium volume. • Spherical shape and pericardial-sided location of CAC are associated with fewer CVD events.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between directly measured density and morphology of coronary artery calcium (CAC) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, using computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Framingham Heart Study (FHS) participants with CAC in noncontrast cardiac CT (2002-2005) were included and followed until 2016. Participants with known CVD or uninterpretable CT scans were excluded. We assessed and correlated (Spearman) CAC density, CAC volume, and the number of calcified segments. Moreover, we counted morphology features including shape (cylindrical, spherical, semi-tubular, and spotty), location (bifurcation, facing pericardium, or facing myocardium), and boundary regularity. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, we associated all CAC characteristics with CVD events (CVD-death, myocardial infarction, stroke). RESULTS: Among 1330 included participants (57.8 ± 11.7 years; 63% male), 73 (5.5%) experienced CVD events in a median follow-up of 9.1 (7.8-10.1) years. CAC density correlated strongly with CAC volume (Spearman's ρ = 0.75; p < 0.001) and lower number of calcified segments (ρ = - 0.86; p < 0.001; controlled for CAC volume). In the survival analysis, CAC density was associated with CVD events independent of Framingham risk score (HR (per SD) = 2.09; 95%CI, 1.30-3.34; p = 0.002) but not after adjustment for CAC volume (p = 0.648). The extent of spherically shaped and pericardially sided calcifications was associated with fewer CVD events accounting for the number of calcified segments (HR (per count) = 0.55; 95%CI, 0.31-0.98; p = 0.042 and HR = 0.66; 95%CI, 0.45-0.98; p = 0.039, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Directly measured CAC density does not predict CVD events due to the strong correlation with CAC volume. The spherical shape and pericardial-sided location of CAC are associated with fewer CVD events and may represent morphological features related to stable coronary plaques. KEY POINTS: • Coronary calcium density may not be independently associated with cardiovascular events. • Coronary calcium density correlates strongly with calcium volume. • Spherical shape and pericardial-sided location of CAC are associated with fewer CVD events.
Authors: Yu Kataoka; Kathy Wolski; Kiyoko Uno; Rishi Puri; E Murat Tuzcu; Steven E Nissen; Stephen J Nicholls Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; James K Min; Khurram Nasir; Joe X Xie; Daniel S Berman; Michael D Miedema; Seamus P Whelton; Zeina A Dardari; Alan Rozanski; John Rumberger; C Noel Bairey Merz; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Matthew J Budoff; Michael J Blaha Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Maros Ferencik; Karol M Pencina; Ting Liu; Khristine Ghemigian; Kristin Baltrusaitis; Joseph M Massaro; Ralph B D'Agostino; Christopher J O'Donnell; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: David C Goff; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Glen Bennett; Sean Coady; Ralph B D'Agostino; Raymond Gibbons; Philip Greenland; Daniel T Lackland; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer G Robinson; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Paul Sorlie; Neil J Stone; Peter W F Wilson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert Detrano; Alan D Guerci; J Jeffrey Carr; Diane E Bild; Gregory Burke; Aaron R Folsom; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; David A Bluemke; Daniel H O'Leary; Russell Tracy; Karol Watson; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Takehiro Nakahara; Marc R Dweck; Navneet Narula; David Pisapia; Jagat Narula; H William Strauss Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05