| Literature DB >> 31049008 |
Mingsan Miao1, Mengfan Peng1, Baosong Liu1, Ming Bai1.
Abstract
AIMS: Explore the effect of compound lobelia oral liquid on acute pharyngitis rabbits model caused by ammonium hydroxide, evaluate its curative effect.Entities:
Keywords: Acute pharyngitis; Blood routine examination; Pathological changes
Year: 2019 PMID: 31049008 PMCID: PMC6486538 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.02.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Comparison of visual observation of pharyngeal tissue of rabbits in each group.
| Group | Dose | − | + | ++ | +++ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank group | – | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Model group | – | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Yinhuang group | 6 ml/kg | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
| Compound lobelia | 18 g/kg | 10 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 0 |
| 9 g/kg | 10 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 0 | |
| 4.5 g/kg | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
Effects of compound lobelia oral liquid on TNF-α level of acute pharyngitis rabbit model.
| Group | Dose | TNF-α (pg/ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blank group | – | 10 | 156.06 ± 9.42 |
| Model group | – | 10 | 196.34 ± 23.28## |
| Yinhuang group | 6 ml/kg | 10 | 168.94 ± 13.33** |
| Compound lobelia group | 18 g/kg | 10 | 169.23 ± 11.14** |
| 9 g/kg | 10 | 178.73 ± 10.11** | |
| 4. 5 g/kg | 10 | 192.46 ± 18.92 |
Note: Compared with the model group, **represent P < 0.01, *represent P < 0. 05. Compared with the blank group, ##represent P < 0. 01, #represent P < 0. 05.
Effects of compound lobelia oral liquid on blood routine of acute pharyngitis rabbit model.
| Group | Dose | WBC (109/L) | Percentage of neutral cells (%) | Lymphocyte number (109/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank group | – | 11.25 ± 0.54** | 44.70 ± 2.93 | 4.52 ± 0.32 |
| Model group | – | 12.78 ± 0.41 | 38.18 ± 1.81## | 5.82 ± 0.33## |
| Yinhuang group | 6 ml/kg | 11.07 ± 0.30** | 43.90 ± 3.19** | 4.52 ± 0.20** |
| Compound lobelia | 18 g/kg | 11.44 ± 0.40** | 41.91 ± 2.02** | 4.84 ± 0.16** |
| 9 g/kg | 11.62 ± 0.72** | 41.15 ± 2.61** | 4.99 ± 0.27** | |
| 4.5 g/kg | 11.73 ± 0.48** | 39.44 ± 2.21 | 5.22 ± 0.26** |
Note: Compared with the model group, **represent P < 0.01, *represent P < 0. 05. Compared with the blank group, ##represent P < 0. 01, #represent P < 0. 05.
Fig. 1Pathological changes of pharyngeal tissues in each group (HEx100).
Histopathological grading table of pharyngeal tissue of rabbits in each group.
| Group | Dose | Pharyngeal histopathologic classification | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| − | + | ++ | +++ | |||
| Blank group | – | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Model group | – | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Yinhuang group | 6 ml/kg | 10 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
| Compound lobelia group | 18 g/kg | 10 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 g/kg | 10 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 0 | |
| 4.5 g/kg | 10 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 0 | |
“−” means that the pharyngeal tissue was normal and no lesion was observed; “+” indicates that the squamous epithelium of pharyngeal mucosa showed mild hyperplasia and a small amount of inflammatory cells infiltrated under the mucosa. “++” means the mucosal squamous epithelium of the pharynx was obviously hyperplasia with inflammatory cells infiltrating into the lower layer. “+++” means the pharyngeal mucosal squamous epithelium shows moderate or severe hyperplasia with submucosal inflammatory cells.