Literature DB >> 31048981

Globally distributed occurrences utilised in 200 spider species conservation profiles (Arachnida, Araneae).

Pedro Cardoso1,2, Vaughn Shirey1,3, Sini Seppälä1,2, Sergio Henriques1,4,2, Michael L Draney5,2, Stefan Foord6,2, Alastair T Gibbons7,2, Luz A Gomez8,2, Sarah Kariko9,2, Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte1,2,10, Marc Milne11,2, Cor J Vink12,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on 200 species of spiders were collected to assess the global threat status of the group worldwide. To supplement existing digital occurrence records from GBIF, a dataset of new occurrence records was compiled for all species using published literature or online sources, from which geographic coordinates were extracted or interpreted from locality description data. NEW INFORMATION: A total of 5,104 occurrence records were obtained, of which 2,378 were from literature or online sources other than GBIF. Of these, 2,308 had coordinate data. Reporting years ranged from 1834 to 2017. Most records were from North America and Europe, with Brazil, China, India and Australia also well represented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthropoda ; IUCN; bibliography search; threat status

Year:  2019        PMID: 31048981      PMCID: PMC6477866          DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e33264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodivers Data J        ISSN: 1314-2828


Introduction

Spiders (, ) are a largely under-represented group amongst reported biodiversity occurrence records in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF; Troudet et al. 2017). As such, aggregating new information regarding their distribution through time and space is crucial towards remedying shortfalls associated with the lack of data on species distributions – the Wallacean Shortfall (Lomolino 2004). These knowledge gaps can confound conservation efforts, particularly of invertebrates, a group that is already largely understudied (Cardoso et al. 2011). A sample of 200 species of spiders were randomly selected from the World Spider Catalog (2018) as required by IUCN for the Sampled Red List Index. The World Spider Catalogue is an updated global database containing all recognised species names for the group and the best source of information for this type of analysis. Species data were collected from all taxonomic bibliography available at the World Spider Catalog 2018 and complemented by data in other publications found through Google Scholar or other sources (https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org; https://login.webofknowledge.com; http://srs.britishspiders.org.uk; http://symbiota4.acis.ufl.edu/scan/portal; https://lepus.unine.ch; http://www.tuite.nl/iwg/Araneae/SpiBenelux/?species; https://atlas.arages.de; https://arachnology.cz/rad/araneae-1.html; http://biodiversityresearch.org/research/biogeography/iberia). These data were used previously in assessing the global threat status of spider species worldwide (Seppälä et al. 2018a, Seppälä et al. 2018b, Seppälä et al. 2018c, Seppälä et al. 2018d). This will serve as the basis for a future Sampled Red List Index (SRLI) for spiders. SRLI are typically employed to assess the conservation priorities and trends of large organismal groups and are thus suited for assessing the conservation trends of large taxa as a whole. The present paper compiles all data used in these assessments beyond those already present in GBIF and makes accessible all geographical information currently available on these 200 species.

Geographic coverage

Description

Global.

Temporal coverage

Data range: 1834-1-01 – 2017-12-31.

Usage rights

Use license

Creative Commons Public Domain Waiver (CC-Zero)

Data resources

Data package title

Global Spider Red List Index

Resource link

http://ipt.pensoft.net/resource?r=srli_global_araneae

Number of data sets

1

Data set 1.

Data set name

SRLI_Global_Araneae

Number of columns

21

Description

The goal of this project is to serve as the basis for a future Sampled Red List Index (SRLI) for spiders.

Additional information

A total of 5,104 occurrence records were obtained, of which 2,378 were from literature or online sources other than GBIF and are included in this dataset. Of these, 2,308 had coordinate data. We should note that, following the IUCN guidelines, records outside the native range of a species are not included in analyses, here or in the conservation profiles. Reporting years ranged from 1834 to 2017. Most records of the 200 species that we selected randomly from all those known at the global level were from a few better-known regions (Fig. 1). Higher numbers of records were found in the USA, Canada, Brazil and Australia (Fig. 2) and higher numbers of species in the USA, China, India and Australia (Fig. 3). Yet, when corrected by area, higher densities of both records and species were found in several European countries (Figs 4, 5).
Figure 1.

Map of distribution of records.

Figure 2.

Map of records per country.

Figure 3.

Map of species per country.

Figure 4.

Number of records per country, standardised by country area.

Figure 5.

Number of species per country, standardised by country area.

We also assessed temporal trends within the data. As is common for multiple taxa and regions, the number of records increased with time, with most being published during the last few decades (Fig. 6). The number of unique species recorded per decade is also increasing, although in a less dramatic way (Fig. 7).
Figure 6.

Number of records published per decade (bars) and respective accumulation curve (line).

Figure 7.

Number of species published per decade (bars) and respective accumulation curve (line).

Finally, the species (record) abundance distribution (Fig. 8) shows that most species have very few records, with more than one third of the species having a single record and more than half with three or less.
Figure 8.

Abundance distribution of all species records.

Although we have only looked at a sample of 200 species, given the random nature of their selection, the trends we found should be representative of spiders as a whole. There is a clear geographical bias of available data towards some regions, an increase in the number of studies reporting useful locality data during the latter decades and yet, most species at a global level are still almost entirely unknown beyond a name and an often old and incomplete taxonomic description.
RankScientific NameCommon Name
order Araneae Spiders
Data set 1.
Column labelColumn description
occurrenceIDAn identifier for the Occurrence (as opposed to a particular digital record of the occurrence).
basisOfRecordThe specific nature of the data record.
taxonRankThe taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the scientificName.
phylumThe full scientific name of the phylum or division in which the taxon is classified.
classThe full scientific name of the class in which the taxon is classified.
orderThe full scientific name of the order in which the taxon is classified.
familyThe full scientific name of the family in which the taxon is classified.
genusThe full scientific name of the genus in which the taxon is classified.
specificEpithetThe name of the first or species epithet of the scientificName.
scientificNameThe full scientific name, with authorship and date information if known.
scientificNameAuthorshipThe authorship information for the scientificName formatted according to the conventions of the applicable nomenclaturalCode.
verbatimLocalityThe original textual description of the place.
countryThe name of the country or major administrative unit in which the Location occurs.
decimalLatitudeThe geographic latitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location.
decimalLongitudeThe geographic longitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location.
geodeticDatumThe ellipsoid, geodetic datum or spatial reference system (SRS) upon which the geographic coordinates given in decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude as based.
georeferencedByA list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations who determined the georeference (spatial representation) for the Location.
georeferenceProtocolA description or reference to the methods used to determine the spatial footprint, coordinates and uncertainties.
verbatimEventDateThe verbatim original representation of the date and time information for an Event. The nature of the event is dependent on the source, including individual samples or entire sampling seasons in single sites or regions.
eventDateThe date-time or interval during which an Event occurred.
associatedReferencesA list (concatenated and separated) of identifiers (publication, bibliographic reference, global unique identifier, URI) of literature associated with the Occurrence.
  5 in total

1.  Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders IV: Scytodidae to Zoropsidae.

Authors:  Sini Seppälä; Sérgio Henriques; Michael L Draney; Stefan Foord; Alastair T Gibbons; Luz A Gomez; Sarah Kariko; Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte; Marc Milne; Cor J Vink; Pedro Cardoso
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2018-12-14

2.  Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences.

Authors:  Julien Troudet; Philippe Grandcolas; Amandine Blin; Régine Vignes-Lebbe; Frédéric Legendre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders II: Gnaphosidae to Nemesiidae.

Authors:  Sini Seppälä; Sérgio Henriques; Michael L Draney; Stefan Foord; Alastair T Gibbons; Luz A Gomez; Sarah Kariko; Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte; Marc Milne; Cor J Vink; Pedro Cardoso
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2018-06-29

4.  Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders I: Agelenidae to Filistatidae.

Authors:  Sini Seppälä; Sérgio Henriques; Michael L Draney; Stefan Foord; Alastair T Gibbons; Luz A Gomez; Sarah Kariko; Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte; Marc Milne; Cor J Vink; Pedro Cardoso
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2018-04-25

5.  Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders III: Oecobiidae to Salticidae.

Authors:  Sini Seppälä; Sérgio Henriques; Michael L Draney; Stefan Foord; Alastair T Gibbons; Luz A Gomez; Sarah Kariko; Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte; Marc Milne; Cor J Vink; Pedro Cardoso
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2018-08-02
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Current GBIF occurrence data demonstrates both promise and limitations for potential red listing of spiders.

Authors:  Vaughn Shirey; Sini Seppälä; Vasco Veiga Branco; Pedro Cardoso
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2019-12-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.