Literature DB >> 31048509

Multidisciplinary home-based rehabilitation in inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Lara Edbrooke1,2, Sanchia Aranda3,4, Catherine L Granger1,5, Christine F McDonald6,7, Mei Krishnasamy8,9, Linda Mileshkin10,11, Ross A Clark12, Ian Gordon13, Louis Irving14, Linda Denehy15,16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and high symptom burden. This trial aimed to assess the efficacy of home-based rehabilitation versus usual care in inoperable lung cancer.
METHODS: A parallel-group, assessor-blinded, allocation-concealed, randomised controlled trial. Eligible participants were allocated (1:1) to usual care (UC) plus 8 weeks of aerobic and resistance exercise with behaviour change strategies and symptom support (intervention group (IG)) or UC alone. Assessments occurred at baseline, 9 weeks and 6 months. The primary outcome, change in between-group 6 min walk distance (6MWD), was analysed using intention-to-treat (ITT). Subsequent analyses involved modified ITT (mITT) and included participants with at least one follow-up outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included HRQoL and symptoms.
RESULTS: Ninety-two participants were recruited. Characteristics of participants (UC=47, IG=45): mean (SD) age 64 (12) years; men 55%; disease stage n (%) III=35 (38) and IV=48 (52); radical treatment 46%. There were no significant between-group differences for the 6MWD (n=92) at 9 weeks (p=0.308) or 6 months (p=0.979). The mITT analyses of 6MWD between-group differences were again non-significant (mean difference (95% CI): 9 weeks: -25.4 m (-64.0 to 13.3), p=0.198 and 6 months: 41.3 m (-26.7 to 109.4), p=0.232). Significant 6-month differences, favouring the IG, were found for HRQoL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung: 13.0 (3.9 to 22.1), p=0.005) and symptom severity (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Lung Cancer: -2.2 (-3.6 to -0.9), p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Home-based rehabilitation did not improve functional exercise capacity but there were improvements in patient-reported exploratory secondary outcomes measures observed at 6 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614001268639). © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exercise; non-small cell lung cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31048509     DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  10 in total

1.  Association of Leisure-Time Physical Activity With Health-Related Quality of Life Among US Lung Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Duc M Ha; Allan V Prochazka; David B Bekelman; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Edward D Chan; Robert L Keith
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-01-23

2.  Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation is an Effective Way for Better Postoperative Outcomes in Surgical Lung Cancer Patients with Risk Factors: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kun Zhou; Yutian Lai; Yan Wang; Xin Sun; Chunmei Mo; Jiao Wang; Yanming Wu; Jue Li; Shuai Chang; Guowei Che
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Physical Activity Levels Are Low in Inoperable Lung Cancer: Exploratory Analyses from a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lara Edbrooke; Catherine L Granger; Ross A Clark; Linda Denehy
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  A randomized, feasibility trial of an exercise and nutrition-based rehabilitation programme (ENeRgy) in people with cancer.

Authors:  Charlie C Hall; Richard J E Skipworth; Honor Blackwood; Duncan Brown; Jane Cook; Katharina Diernberger; Elizabeth Dixon; Valerie Gibson; Catriona Graham; Peter Hall; Erna Haraldsdottir; Jane Hopkinson; Anna Lloyd; Matthew Maddocks; Lucy Norris; Sharon Tuck; Marie T Fallon; Barry J A Laird
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 12.910

5.  Effect of a postoperative home-based exercise and self-management programme on physical function in people with lung cancer (CAPACITY): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Catherine L Granger; Lara Edbrooke; Phillip Antippa; Gavin Wright; Christine F McDonald; Karen E Lamb; Louis Irving; Meinir Krishnasamy; Shaza Abo; Georgina A Whish-Wilson; Dominic Truong; Linda Denehy; Selina M Parry
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2022-01

6.  Lung Cancer and Self-Management Interventions: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Rachel Anne Rowntree; Hassan Hosseinzadeh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Jamie L Waterland; Hilmy Ismail; Catherine L Granger; Cameron Patrick; Linda Denehy; Bernhard Riedel
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-23

8.  Exercise experiences in patients with metastatic lung cancer: A qualitative approach.

Authors:  Pi-Hua Chang; Ching-Rong Lin; Yun-Hsiang Lee; Yi-Lin Liu; Gee-Chen Chang; Aasha I Hoogland; Yeur-Hur Lai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  LncRNA GMDS-AS1 inhibits lung adenocarcinoma development by regulating miR-96-5p/CYLD signaling.

Authors:  Ming Zhao; Xiao-Feng Xin; Jian-Ya Zhang; Wei Dai; Tang-Feng Lv; Yong Song
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Implications for post critical illness trial design: sub-phenotyping trajectories of functional recovery among sepsis survivors.

Authors:  Zudin A Puthucheary; Jochen S Gensichen; Aylin S Cakiroglu; Richard Cashmore; Lara Edbrooke; Christoph Heintze; Konrad Neumann; Tobias Wollersheim; Linda Denehy; Konrad F R Schmidt
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.