| Literature DB >> 31048376 |
Kenneth Huang1, Suela Xhani1, Amanda V Albrecht1, Van L T Ha1, Shingo Esaki1, Gregory M K Poon2,3.
Abstract
Functional evidence increasingly implicates low-affinity DNA recognition by transcription factors as a general mechanism for the spatiotemporal control of developmental genes. Although the DNA sequence requirements for affinity are well-defined, the dynamic mechanisms that execute cognate recognition are much less resolved. To address this gap, here we examined ETS1, a paradigm developmental transcription factor, as a model for which cognate discrimination remains enigmatic. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we interrogated the DNA-binding domain of murine ETS1 alone and when bound to high-and low-affinity cognate sites or to nonspecific DNA. The results of our analyses revealed collective backbone and side-chain motions that distinguished cognate versus nonspecific as well as high- versus low-affinity cognate DNA binding. Combined with binding experiments with site-directed ETS1 mutants, the molecular dynamics data disclosed a triad of residues that respond specifically to low-affinity cognate DNA. We found that a DNA-contacting residue (Gln-336) specifically recognizes low-affinity DNA and triggers the loss of a distal salt bridge (Glu-343/Arg-378) via a large side-chain motion that compromises the hydrophobic packing of two core helices. As an intact Glu-343/Arg-378 bridge is the default state in unbound ETS1 and maintained in high-affinity and nonspecific complexes, the low-affinity complex represents a unique conformational adaptation to the suboptimization of developmental enhancers.Entities:
Keywords: DNA binding protein; DNA sequence motif; DNA-binding domain; ETS proto-oncogene 1 transcription factor (ETS1); ETS transcription factor family; allosteric regulation; developmental factor; low-affinity DNA binding; molecular dynamics; suboptimization; transcription enhancer; transcription factor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31048376 PMCID: PMC6597803 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007866
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Chem ISSN: 0021-9258 Impact factor: 5.157