Literature DB >> 31048376

Mechanism of cognate sequence discrimination by the ETS-family transcription factor ETS-1.

Kenneth Huang1, Suela Xhani1, Amanda V Albrecht1, Van L T Ha1, Shingo Esaki1, Gregory M K Poon2,3.   

Abstract

Functional evidence increasingly implicates low-affinity DNA recognition by transcription factors as a general mechanism for the spatiotemporal control of developmental genes. Although the DNA sequence requirements for affinity are well-defined, the dynamic mechanisms that execute cognate recognition are much less resolved. To address this gap, here we examined ETS1, a paradigm developmental transcription factor, as a model for which cognate discrimination remains enigmatic. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we interrogated the DNA-binding domain of murine ETS1 alone and when bound to high-and low-affinity cognate sites or to nonspecific DNA. The results of our analyses revealed collective backbone and side-chain motions that distinguished cognate versus nonspecific as well as high- versus low-affinity cognate DNA binding. Combined with binding experiments with site-directed ETS1 mutants, the molecular dynamics data disclosed a triad of residues that respond specifically to low-affinity cognate DNA. We found that a DNA-contacting residue (Gln-336) specifically recognizes low-affinity DNA and triggers the loss of a distal salt bridge (Glu-343/Arg-378) via a large side-chain motion that compromises the hydrophobic packing of two core helices. As an intact Glu-343/Arg-378 bridge is the default state in unbound ETS1 and maintained in high-affinity and nonspecific complexes, the low-affinity complex represents a unique conformational adaptation to the suboptimization of developmental enhancers.
© 2019 Huang et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA binding protein; DNA sequence motif; DNA-binding domain; ETS proto-oncogene 1 transcription factor (ETS1); ETS transcription factor family; allosteric regulation; developmental factor; low-affinity DNA binding; molecular dynamics; suboptimization; transcription enhancer; transcription factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31048376      PMCID: PMC6597803          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  61 in total

Review 1.  Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  Remo Rohs; Xiangshu Jin; Sean M West; Rohit Joshi; Barry Honig; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Correlated motions and interactions at the onset of the DNA-induced partial unfolding of Ets-1.

Authors:  Hiqmet Kamberaj; Arjan van der Vaart
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Ets1 is required for proper migration and differentiation of the cardiac neural crest.

Authors:  Zhiguang Gao; Gene H Kim; Alexander C Mackinnon; Alleda E Flagg; Brett Bassett; Judy U Earley; Eric C Svensson
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Syntax compensates for poor binding sites to encode tissue specificity of developmental enhancers.

Authors:  Emma K Farley; Katrina M Olson; Wei Zhang; Daniel S Rokhsar; Michael S Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Distinct Roles for Interfacial Hydration in Site-Specific DNA Recognition by ETS-Family Transcription Factors.

Authors:  Suela Xhani; Shingo Esaki; Kenneth Huang; Noa Erlitzki; Gregory M K Poon
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Low affinity binding site clusters confer hox specificity and regulatory robustness.

Authors:  Justin Crocker; Namiko Abe; Lucrezia Rinaldi; Alistair P McGregor; Nicolás Frankel; Shu Wang; Ahmad Alsawadi; Philippe Valenti; Serge Plaza; François Payre; Richard S Mann; David L Stern
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Genomic and biochemical insights into the specificity of ETS transcription factors.

Authors:  Peter C Hollenhorst; Lawrence P McIntosh; Barbara J Graves
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 23.643

8.  The affinity of Ets-1 for DNA is modulated by phosphorylation through transient interactions of an unstructured region.

Authors:  Gregory M Lee; Miles A Pufall; Charles A Meeker; Hyun-Seo Kang; Barbara J Graves; Lawrence P McIntosh
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  High constitutive activity of a broad panel of housekeeping and tissue-specific cis-regulatory elements depends on a subset of ETS proteins.

Authors:  Alessia Curina; Alberto Termanini; Iros Barozzi; Elena Prosperini; Marta Simonatto; Sara Polletti; Alessio Silvola; Monica Soldi; Liv Austenaa; Tiziana Bonaldi; Serena Ghisletti; Gioacchino Natoli
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Structural basis of Ets1 activation by Runx1.

Authors:  T Shrivastava; K Mino; N D Babayeva; O I Baranovskaya; A Rizzino; T H Tahirov
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  2 in total

1.  Salt bridge dynamics in protein/DNA recognition: a comparative analysis of Elk1 and ETV6.

Authors:  Tam D Vo; Amelia L Schneider; W David Wilson; Gregory M K Poon
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.676

2.  The Non-continuum Nature of Eukaryotic Transcriptional Regulation.

Authors:  Gregory M K Poon
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.