Xiaofei Li1, Hui Li2, Wentao Ma1, Xiaohui Ning1, Erpeng Liang1, Kunjing Pang2, Yan Yao1, Wei Hua1, Shu Zhang1, Xiaohan Fan3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Echocardiography, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Electronic address: fanxiaohan@fuwaihospital.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), a new pacing approach, lacks adequate evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, safety, and acute effect of permanent LBBAP in patients with atrioventricular block (AVB). METHODS: A total of 33 AVB patients with indications for ventricular pacing were recruited. Electrocardiograms, pacing parameters, echocardiographic measurements, and complications associated with LBBAP were evaluated perioperatively and at 3-month follow-up. Successful LBBAP was defined as a paced QRS morphology of right bundle branch block pattern in lead V1 and QRS duration (QRSd) less than 130 ms. RESULTS: LBBAP was successfully performed in 90.9% (30/33) of patients (mean age: 55.1 ± 18.5 years; 66.7% male). The mean capture threshold was similar during the procedure (0.76 ± 0.26 V at 0.4 ms) and at the 3-month follow-up (0.64 ± 0.20 V at 0.4 ms). The paced QRSd was 112.8 ± 10.9 ms during the procedure and 116.8 ± 10.4 ms at the 3-month follow-up. Baseline left or right bundle branch block was corrected (intrinsic QRSd 153.3 ± 27.8 ms vs paced QRSd 122.2 ± 9.9 ms) with a success rate of 68.7% (11/16). One ventricular septal lead perforation occurred soon after the procedure with characteristics of pacing failure, and lead revision was successful. Cardiac function and left ventricular synchronization by 2-dimensional echocardiographic strain imaging at the 3-month follow-up slightly improved compared with that at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent LBBAP yielded a stable threshold, a narrow QRSd, and preserved left ventricular synchrony with few complications. Our preliminary results indicate that LBBAP holds promise as an attractive physiological pacing strategy for AVB.
BACKGROUND:Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), a new pacing approach, lacks adequate evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, safety, and acute effect of permanent LBBAP in patients with atrioventricular block (AVB). METHODS: A total of 33 AVB patients with indications for ventricular pacing were recruited. Electrocardiograms, pacing parameters, echocardiographic measurements, and complications associated with LBBAP were evaluated perioperatively and at 3-month follow-up. Successful LBBAP was defined as a paced QRS morphology of right bundle branch block pattern in lead V1 and QRS duration (QRSd) less than 130 ms. RESULTS: LBBAP was successfully performed in 90.9% (30/33) of patients (mean age: 55.1 ± 18.5 years; 66.7% male). The mean capture threshold was similar during the procedure (0.76 ± 0.26 V at 0.4 ms) and at the 3-month follow-up (0.64 ± 0.20 V at 0.4 ms). The paced QRSd was 112.8 ± 10.9 ms during the procedure and 116.8 ± 10.4 ms at the 3-month follow-up. Baseline left or right bundle branch block was corrected (intrinsic QRSd 153.3 ± 27.8 ms vs paced QRSd 122.2 ± 9.9 ms) with a success rate of 68.7% (11/16). One ventricular septal lead perforation occurred soon after the procedure with characteristics of pacing failure, and lead revision was successful. Cardiac function and left ventricular synchronization by 2-dimensional echocardiographic strain imaging at the 3-month follow-up slightly improved compared with that at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent LBBAP yielded a stable threshold, a narrow QRSd, and preserved left ventricular synchrony with few complications. Our preliminary results indicate that LBBAP holds promise as an attractive physiological pacing strategy for AVB.