Kathy L Rush1, Lindsay Burton2, Kira Schaab3, Alexandra Lukey2. 1. Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, Canada. 2. School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Canada. 3. University of Medicine and Health Sciences, St Kitts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation, the most common arrhythmia worldwide, continues to increase as the population ages. Patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly those newly diagnosed or who have multiple comorbidities, have high healthcare utilisation rates. Nurse-led atrial fibrillation clinics have developed to improve care and guidance for atrial fibrillation patients, with the potential to reduce hospital presentations and healthcare utilisation. Atrial fibrillation clinics that provide specialised and patient-centred care have improved patient symptom management, quality of life and reduced healthcare utilisation and costs. AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide the first synthesis of evidence for the impact of nurse-led atrial fibrillation clinics on patient, healthcare utilisation, and quality of care outcomes. METHODS: This systematic mixed studies review examined citations from three databases: Medline, CINAHL and Embase, using the search terms 'atrial fibrillation' and 'clinic', and related concepts. Seventeen moderate to high quality articles were selected. RESULTS: Overall, atrial fibrillation clinics were more cost effective, had shorter wait times and reduced hospitalisation and emergency department visits. Symptoms and sinus rhythm restoration were comparable in the nurse-led compared to physician-led cardioversion clinics. Findings related to patient knowledge and patient satisfaction were mixed, while mortality rates were lower, and patient medication adherence was higher in nurse-led atrial fibrillation compared to usual care. Quality of life and guideline adherence was increased in patients receiving nurse-led atrial fibrillation care compared to usual care. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led clinics improved healthcare, patient and quality care outcomes. Future research might examine the role of technology in delivery of nurse-led clinics in rural/remote areas as well as patient experiences with nurse-led clinics.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation, the most common arrhythmia worldwide, continues to increase as the population ages. Patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly those newly diagnosed or who have multiple comorbidities, have high healthcare utilisation rates. Nurse-led atrial fibrillation clinics have developed to improve care and guidance for atrial fibrillation patients, with the potential to reduce hospital presentations and healthcare utilisation. Atrial fibrillation clinics that provide specialised and patient-centred care have improved patient symptom management, quality of life and reduced healthcare utilisation and costs. AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide the first synthesis of evidence for the impact of nurse-led atrial fibrillation clinics on patient, healthcare utilisation, and quality of care outcomes. METHODS: This systematic mixed studies review examined citations from three databases: Medline, CINAHL and Embase, using the search terms 'atrial fibrillation' and 'clinic', and related concepts. Seventeen moderate to high quality articles were selected. RESULTS: Overall, atrial fibrillation clinics were more cost effective, had shorter wait times and reduced hospitalisation and emergency department visits. Symptoms and sinus rhythm restoration were comparable in the nurse-led compared to physician-led cardioversion clinics. Findings related to patient knowledge and patient satisfaction were mixed, while mortality rates were lower, and patient medication adherence was higher in nurse-led atrial fibrillation compared to usual care. Quality of life and guideline adherence was increased in patients receiving nurse-led atrial fibrillation care compared to usual care. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led clinics improved healthcare, patient and quality care outcomes. Future research might examine the role of technology in delivery of nurse-led clinics in rural/remote areas as well as patient experiences with nurse-led clinics.
Authors: Mina K Chung; Angela Fagerlin; Paul J Wang; Tinuola B Ajayi; Larry A Allen; Tina Baykaner; Emelia J Benjamin; Megan Branda; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Lin Y Chen; George H Crossley; Rebecca K Delaney; Lee L Eckhardt; Kathleen L Grady; Ian G Hargraves; Mellanie True Hills; Matthew M Kalscheur; Daniel B Kramer; Marleen Kunneman; Rachel Lampert; Aisha T Langford; Krystina B Lewis; Ying Lu; John M Mandrola; Kathryn Martinez; Daniel D Matlock; Sarah R McCarthy; Victor M Montori; Peter A Noseworthy; Kate M Orland; Elissa Ozanne; Rod Passman; Krishna Pundi; Dan M Roden; Elizabeth V Saarel; Monika M Schmidt; Samuel F Sears; Dawn Stacey; Randall S Stafford; Benjamin A Steinberg; Sojin Youn Wass; Jennifer M Wright Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2021-12-06
Authors: F R Piersma; J Neefs; W R Berger; N W E van den Berg; R Wesselink; S P J Krul; J R de Groot Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 2.854
Authors: Kathryn Lauren Hong; Corinne Babiolakis; Brigita Zile; Milena Bullen; Sohaib Haseeb; Frank Halperin; Corinne M Hohl; Kirk Magee; Roopinder K Sandhu; Simon Yu Tian; Ashley Kennedy; Trudie Lobban; Zana Mariano; Paul Dorian; Paul Angaran; Marilyn Evans; Peter Leong-Sit; Benedict M Glover Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 2.692