Literature DB >> 31045753

Relationship Between Velocity Loss and Repetitions in Reserve in the Bench Press and Back Squat Exercises.

David Rodríguez-Rosell1, Juan Manuel Yáñez-García1, Luis Sánchez-Medina2, Ricardo Mora-Custodio1, Juan José González-Badillo1.   

Abstract

Rodríguez-Rosell, D, Yáñez-García, JM, Sánchez-Medina, L, Mora-Custodio, R, and González-Badillo, JJ. Relationship between velocity loss and repetitions in reserve in the bench press and back squat exercises. J Strength Cond Res 34(9): 2537-2547, 2020-This study aimed to compare the pattern of repetition velocity decline during a single set to failure performed against 4 relative loads in the bench press (BP) and full back squat (SQ) exercises. After an initial test to determine 1 repetition maximum (1RM) strength and load-velocity relationships, 20 men performed one set of repetitions to failure (MNR test) against loads of 50, 60, 70, and 80% 1RM in BP and SQ, on 8 random order sessions performed every 6-7 days. Velocity against the load that elicited a ∼1.00 m·s (V1 m·s load) was measured before and immediately after each MNR test, and it was considered a measure of acute muscle fatigue. The number of repetitions completed against each relative load showed high interindividual variability in both BP (coefficient of variation [CV]: 15-22%) and SQ (CV: 26-34%). Strong relationships were found between the relative loss of velocity in the set and the percentage of performed repetitions in both exercises (R = 0.97 and 0.93 for BP and SQ, respectively). Equations to predict repetitions left in reserve from velocity loss are provided. For a given magnitude of velocity loss within the set (15-65%), the percentages of performed repetitions were lower for the BP compared with the SQ for all loads analyzed. Acute fatigue after each set to failure was found dependent on the magnitude of velocity loss (r = 0.97 and 0.99 for BP and SQ, respectively) but independent of the number of repetitions completed by each participant (p > 0.05) for both exercises. The percentage of velocity loss against the V1 m·s load decreased as relative load increased, being greater for BP than SQ. These findings indicate that monitoring repetition velocity can be used to provide a very good estimate of the number (or percentage) of repetitions actually performed and those left in reserve in each exercise set, and thus to more objectively quantify the level of effort incurred during resistance training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31045753     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  16 in total

1.  Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches.

Authors:  Hadar Schwartz; Aviv Emanuel; Isaac Isur Rozen Samukas; Israel Halperin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Ergogenic Effects of Acute Carbohydrate Feeding on Resistance Exercise Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew King; Eric Helms; Caryn Zinn; Ivan Jukic
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 11.928

3.  The Acute and Chronic Effects of Implementing Velocity Loss Thresholds During Resistance Training: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Critical Evaluation of the Literature.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Alejandro Pérez Castilla; Amador García Ramos; Bas Van Hooren; Michael R McGuigan; Eric R Helms
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 11.928

4.  Reproducibility and Applicability of Traditional Strength Training Prescription Recommendations.

Authors:  Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar; Juan Hernández-Lougedo; Luis Maicas-Pérez; Raúl Notario-Alonso; Manuel Vicente Garnacho-Castaño; Pablo García-Fernández; José Luis Maté-Muñoz
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 5.  Methods for Controlling and Reporting Resistance Training Proximity to Failure: Current Issues and Future Directions.

Authors:  Joshua C Pelland; Zac P Robinson; Jacob F Remmert; Rebecca M Cerminaro; Brian Benitez; Thomas A John; Eric R Helms; Michael C Zourdos
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 11.928

6.  Differences between adjusted vs. non-adjusted loads in velocity-based training: consequences for strength training control and programming.

Authors:  Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Adrian Castaño-Zambudio; Víctor Cuadrado-Peñafiel; Jorge M González-Hernández; Fernando Capelo-Ramírez; Luis M Martínez-Aranda; Juan J González-Badillo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  The Bench Press Grip Width Does Not Affect the Number of Repetitions Performed at Different Velocity Loss Thresholds.

Authors:  Alejandro Pérez-Castilla; Ivan Jukic; G Gregory Haff; Amador García-Ramos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The Effect of Load and Volume Autoregulation on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Landyn M Hickmott; Philip D Chilibeck; Keely A Shaw; Scotty J Butcher
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-15

Review 9.  Autoregulation in Resistance Training: Addressing the Inconsistencies.

Authors:  Leon Greig; Ben Hayden Stephens Hemingway; Rodrigo R Aspe; Kay Cooper; Paul Comfort; Paul A Swinton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Velocity-Based Resistance Training on 1-RM, Jump and Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Mateo Baena-Marín; Andrés Rojas-Jaramillo; Jhonatan González-Santamaría; David Rodríguez-Rosell; Jorge L Petro; Richard B Kreider; Diego A Bonilla
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.