Literature DB >> 31045600

Partnered Educational Governance: Rethinking Student Agency in Undergraduate Medical Education.

Philippe Antoine Bilodeau1, Xin Mei Liu, Beth-Ann Cummings.   

Abstract

Historically, students have been "consumers" of undergraduate medical education (UME) rather than stakeholders in its design and implementation. Student input has been retrospective, and although UME leaders have been open to feedback, matters most important to students have often been overlooked, leaving students feeling largely unheard. Student representation has also lacked structure and unity of feedback.A vision for effective student representation drove the creation of a partnered educational governance (PEG) model at McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, where sharing of expertise between student representatives and UME leadership has improved the UME program and the educational experience of students.The PEG model is grounded in the literature on student government, the student-as-partner framework, and theories of accountability. As part of the model, the student Medical Education Committee, an organized structure for discussion and reporting to student constituents, was established. This structure allows student representatives, entrusted by their peers and faculty, to proactively provide input to UME committees in the development of policies and curricula. The partnership between students and faculty facilitates a shared understanding of educational challenges and potential solutions.Within the first year, meaningful changes associated with the PEG model included increased student engagement in key program decisions, such as the redesign of a research course and an update to the absences and leaves policy. The PEG model enables unified student representation that is accountable and representative-and has a significant impact on outcomes-while maintaining the UME program's ownership of and responsibility for the curriculum and policies.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31045600     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  3 in total

1.  Student curriculum review team, 8 years later: Where we stand and opportunities for growth.

Authors:  Priyanka Kumar; Christina M Pickering; Lyla Atta; Austin G Burns; Robert F Chu; Thomas Gracie; Caroline X Qin; Katherine A Whang; Harry R Goldberg
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  What is it like to organize a large-scale educational event for fellow students? A qualitative exploration of student participation in curriculum design.

Authors:  Gert Olthuis; Florieke Eggermont; Bas Schouwenberg; Anke Oerlemans; Esther Tanck
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 3.  The Role of Medical Student Government in Responding to COVID-19.

Authors:  Sam Schuiteman; Nadine I Ibrahim; Ali Hammoud; Laura Kruger; Rajesh S Mangrulkar; Michelle Daniel
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 7.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.