Literature DB >> 31045387

Parallel lives: Intergroup contact, threat, and the segregation of everyday activity spaces.

John Dixon1, Colin Tredoux2, Gemma Davies3, Jonny Huck4, Bree Hocking5, Brendan Sturgeon6, Duncan Whyatt3, Neil Jarman6, Dominic Bryan7.   

Abstract

Although intergroup contact can reduce prejudice, opportunities to experience such contact are often constrained by systems of segregation. Work on this problem has focused on divisions entrenched within institutions of residence, education, and employment. Our research employed a complementary approach, which treated segregation as the outcome of individuals' movements over time within everyday life spaces. Taking as a case study Catholics' and Protestants' use of public environments in north Belfast, we used GPS tracking technology, combined with GIS analytics, to explore the time geography of residents' activity space use over a 2-week period (Study 1). We also conducted a field survey to explore how psychological factors shaped their willingness to use activity spaces beyond their own communities (Study 2). Analysis based on around 1,000 hr of raw movement data revealed that north Belfast is marked by high levels of segregation, expressed via residents' limited use of public spaces, facilities, and pathways located in outgroup areas. However, use of shared spaces is also common, with Catholics spending more time in such spaces than Protestants. Structural equation modeling suggested that residents' self-reported willingness to use activity spaces outside their own communities was associated with both negative and positive intergroup contact-relationships partially mediated by realistic threat, symbolic threat, and anxiety over interaction across sectarian lines. Both kinds of contact and realistic threat were also associated with the time residents actually spent in spaces beyond their own communities. Opportunities for integrating psychological and geographic research on contact and segregation are highlighted. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31045387     DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  5 in total

1.  Are You In or Are You Out? The Importance of Group Saliency in Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition.

Authors:  V Harrison; G Hole; Ruth Habibi
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  'Social Re-presentation for…': An Action-Oriented Formula for Intergroup Relations Research.

Authors:  Luke J Buhagiar; Gordon Sammut
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-03

3.  Variations in subjective definitions of everyday situations as intergroup contact.

Authors:  Tina F Keil; Miriam Koschate
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2020-02-24

4.  Contact Logger: Measuring everyday intergroup contact experiences in near-time.

Authors:  Tina F Keil; Miriam Koschate; Mark Levine
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-08

5.  Exploring factors affecting individual GPS-based activity space and how researcher-defined food environments represent activity space, exposure and use of food outlets.

Authors:  Windi Lameck Marwa; Duncan Radley; Samantha Davis; James McKenna; Claire Griffiths
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.918

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.